Reputation and the Accountability Gap
In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2019-01-01
|
Series: | AJIL Unbound |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811157376276889600 |
---|---|
author | Kristen Boon |
author_facet | Kristen Boon |
author_sort | Kristen Boon |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases against IOs. In particular, it argues that member states and IOs have independent and overlapping concerns that have contributed to devaluing the relevance of a “good reputation,” particularly when it comes to providing compensation for wrongful conduct. IOs, it seems, do not want to develop a reputation for deep pockets. Nonetheless, this essay also demonstrates that when compensation is not at issue, there are instances in which reputation matters to IOs. It concludes by discussing recent cases related to responsibility and organizational immunities and suggests that the trend of narrowing immunities may change the reputational calculus for IOs and member states significantly. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:06:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cb884e120b8c49599ff806619c18ffdf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2398-7723 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:06:28Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | AJIL Unbound |
spelling | doaj.art-cb884e120b8c49599ff806619c18ffdf2023-03-09T12:27:08ZengCambridge University PressAJIL Unbound2398-77232019-01-0111323323710.1017/aju.2019.53Reputation and the Accountability GapKristen Boon0Miriam T. Rooney Professor of Law & Associate Dean for Faculty Research and Development, Seton Hall Law School.In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases against IOs. In particular, it argues that member states and IOs have independent and overlapping concerns that have contributed to devaluing the relevance of a “good reputation,” particularly when it comes to providing compensation for wrongful conduct. IOs, it seems, do not want to develop a reputation for deep pockets. Nonetheless, this essay also demonstrates that when compensation is not at issue, there are instances in which reputation matters to IOs. It concludes by discussing recent cases related to responsibility and organizational immunities and suggests that the trend of narrowing immunities may change the reputational calculus for IOs and member states significantly.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article |
spellingShingle | Kristen Boon Reputation and the Accountability Gap AJIL Unbound |
title | Reputation and the Accountability Gap |
title_full | Reputation and the Accountability Gap |
title_fullStr | Reputation and the Accountability Gap |
title_full_unstemmed | Reputation and the Accountability Gap |
title_short | Reputation and the Accountability Gap |
title_sort | reputation and the accountability gap |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kristenboon reputationandtheaccountabilitygap |