Reputation and the Accountability Gap

In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristen Boon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-01-01
Series:AJIL Unbound
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811157376276889600
author Kristen Boon
author_facet Kristen Boon
author_sort Kristen Boon
collection DOAJ
description In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases against IOs. In particular, it argues that member states and IOs have independent and overlapping concerns that have contributed to devaluing the relevance of a “good reputation,” particularly when it comes to providing compensation for wrongful conduct. IOs, it seems, do not want to develop a reputation for deep pockets. Nonetheless, this essay also demonstrates that when compensation is not at issue, there are instances in which reputation matters to IOs. It concludes by discussing recent cases related to responsibility and organizational immunities and suggests that the trend of narrowing immunities may change the reputational calculus for IOs and member states significantly.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:06:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb884e120b8c49599ff806619c18ffdf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-7723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:06:28Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series AJIL Unbound
spelling doaj.art-cb884e120b8c49599ff806619c18ffdf2023-03-09T12:27:08ZengCambridge University PressAJIL Unbound2398-77232019-01-0111323323710.1017/aju.2019.53Reputation and the Accountability GapKristen Boon0Miriam T. Rooney Professor of Law & Associate Dean for Faculty Research and Development, Seton Hall Law School.In her recent article on the reputation of international organizations (IOs), Kristina Daugirdas concludes that reputation's constraining effect has some serious shortcomings in the context of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). This essay extends those conclusions to recent mass torts cases against IOs. In particular, it argues that member states and IOs have independent and overlapping concerns that have contributed to devaluing the relevance of a “good reputation,” particularly when it comes to providing compensation for wrongful conduct. IOs, it seems, do not want to develop a reputation for deep pockets. Nonetheless, this essay also demonstrates that when compensation is not at issue, there are instances in which reputation matters to IOs. It concludes by discussing recent cases related to responsibility and organizational immunities and suggests that the trend of narrowing immunities may change the reputational calculus for IOs and member states significantly.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Kristen Boon
Reputation and the Accountability Gap
AJIL Unbound
title Reputation and the Accountability Gap
title_full Reputation and the Accountability Gap
title_fullStr Reputation and the Accountability Gap
title_full_unstemmed Reputation and the Accountability Gap
title_short Reputation and the Accountability Gap
title_sort reputation and the accountability gap
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772319000539/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT kristenboon reputationandtheaccountabilitygap