Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives
Model predictive current control (MPCC) and model predictive torque control (MPTC) are two derivatives of model predictive control. These two control methods have demonstrated their strengths in the fault-tolerant control of multiphase motor drives. To explore the inherent link, the pros and cons of...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
China Electrotechnical Society
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9666801 |
| _version_ | 1797755844917460992 |
|---|---|
| author | Wentao Huang Wei Hua Qigao Fan |
| author_facet | Wentao Huang Wei Hua Qigao Fan |
| author_sort | Wentao Huang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Model predictive current control (MPCC) and model predictive torque control (MPTC) are two derivatives of model predictive control. These two control methods have demonstrated their strengths in the fault-tolerant control of multiphase motor drives. To explore the inherent link, the pros and cons of two strategies, the performance analysis and comparative investigation of MPCC and MPTC are conducted through a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor with open-phase fault. In MPCC, the currents of fundamental and harmonic subspaces are simultaneously employed and constrained for a combined regulation of the open-circuit fault drive. In MPTC, apart from the torque and the stator flux related to fundamental subspace, the x-y currents are also considered and predicted to achieve the control of harmonic subspace. The principles of two methods are demonstrated in detail and the link is explored in terms of the cost function. Besides, the performance by two methods is experimentally assessed in terms of steady-state, transition, and dynamic tests. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are concluded. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:52:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cb9509eb3fdf4456a82c2897db4c73e2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2096-3564 2837-0325 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:52:58Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | China Electrotechnical Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems |
| spelling | doaj.art-cb9509eb3fdf4456a82c2897db4c73e22023-08-03T02:43:14ZengChina Electrotechnical SocietyCES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems2096-35642837-03252021-12-015431132010.30941/CESTEMS.2021.00036Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drivesWentao Huang0Wei Hua1Qigao Fan2School of Internet of Things Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, ChinaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, ChinaSchool of Internet of Things Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, ChinaModel predictive current control (MPCC) and model predictive torque control (MPTC) are two derivatives of model predictive control. These two control methods have demonstrated their strengths in the fault-tolerant control of multiphase motor drives. To explore the inherent link, the pros and cons of two strategies, the performance analysis and comparative investigation of MPCC and MPTC are conducted through a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor with open-phase fault. In MPCC, the currents of fundamental and harmonic subspaces are simultaneously employed and constrained for a combined regulation of the open-circuit fault drive. In MPTC, apart from the torque and the stator flux related to fundamental subspace, the x-y currents are also considered and predicted to achieve the control of harmonic subspace. The principles of two methods are demonstrated in detail and the link is explored in terms of the cost function. Besides, the performance by two methods is experimentally assessed in terms of steady-state, transition, and dynamic tests. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are concluded.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9666801permanent magnet motorfive-phasefault-tolerant controlmodel predictive control |
| spellingShingle | Wentao Huang Wei Hua Qigao Fan Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems permanent magnet motor five-phase fault-tolerant control model predictive control |
| title | Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives |
| title_full | Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives |
| title_fullStr | Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives |
| title_short | Performance analysis and comparison of two fault-tolerant model predictive control methods for five-phase PMSM drives |
| title_sort | performance analysis and comparison of two fault tolerant model predictive control methods for five phase pmsm drives |
| topic | permanent magnet motor five-phase fault-tolerant control model predictive control |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9666801 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wentaohuang performanceanalysisandcomparisonoftwofaulttolerantmodelpredictivecontrolmethodsforfivephasepmsmdrives AT weihua performanceanalysisandcomparisonoftwofaulttolerantmodelpredictivecontrolmethodsforfivephasepmsmdrives AT qigaofan performanceanalysisandcomparisonoftwofaulttolerantmodelpredictivecontrolmethodsforfivephasepmsmdrives |