Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
Risk attitudes implied by valuations of risk-increasing assets depart markedly from those implied by valuations of risk-reducing assets. For instance, many are unwilling to pay the expected value for a risky asset or for its perfect hedge. Although nearly every theory of risk preference (and logic)...
Main Authors: | Shane Frederick, Amanda Levis, Steven Malliaris, Andrew Meyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500006549/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Valuing bets and
hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by: Shane Frederick, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Valuing bets and hedges
by: Subimal Chatterjee, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Valuing bets and
hedges
by: Subimal Chatterjee, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Hedging on Betting Markets
by: Gustav Axén, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”
by: Philip W. S. Newall, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)