More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?

Abstract Automated extraction of quantitative linguistic features has the potential to predict objectively the onset and progression of psychosis. These linguistic variables are often considered to be biomarkers, with a large emphasis placed on the pathological aberrations in the biological processe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lena Palaniyappan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-08-01
Series:npj Schizophrenia
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00172-1
_version_ 1797421353181118464
author Lena Palaniyappan
author_facet Lena Palaniyappan
author_sort Lena Palaniyappan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Automated extraction of quantitative linguistic features has the potential to predict objectively the onset and progression of psychosis. These linguistic variables are often considered to be biomarkers, with a large emphasis placed on the pathological aberrations in the biological processes that underwrite the faculty of language in psychosis. This perspective offers a reminder that human language is primarily a social device that is biologically implemented. As such, linguistic aberrations in patients with psychosis reflect both social and biological processes affecting an individual. Failure to consider the sociolinguistic aspects of NLP measures will limit their usefulness as digital tools in clinical settings. In the context of psychosis, considering language as a biosocial marker could lead to less biased and more accessible tools for patient-specific predictions in the clinic.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:15:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb9dd0865a8a450b996366cc3f0dff63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2334-265X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:15:56Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Schizophrenia
spelling doaj.art-cb9dd0865a8a450b996366cc3f0dff632023-12-03T08:35:50ZengNature Portfolionpj Schizophrenia2334-265X2021-08-01711510.1038/s41537-021-00172-1More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?Lena Palaniyappan0Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western OntarioAbstract Automated extraction of quantitative linguistic features has the potential to predict objectively the onset and progression of psychosis. These linguistic variables are often considered to be biomarkers, with a large emphasis placed on the pathological aberrations in the biological processes that underwrite the faculty of language in psychosis. This perspective offers a reminder that human language is primarily a social device that is biologically implemented. As such, linguistic aberrations in patients with psychosis reflect both social and biological processes affecting an individual. Failure to consider the sociolinguistic aspects of NLP measures will limit their usefulness as digital tools in clinical settings. In the context of psychosis, considering language as a biosocial marker could lead to less biased and more accessible tools for patient-specific predictions in the clinic.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00172-1
spellingShingle Lena Palaniyappan
More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
npj Schizophrenia
title More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
title_full More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
title_fullStr More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
title_full_unstemmed More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
title_short More than a biomarker: could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis?
title_sort more than a biomarker could language be a biosocial marker of psychosis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00172-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lenapalaniyappan morethanabiomarkercouldlanguagebeabiosocialmarkerofpsychosis