Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study

Background: Diagnosis of external root resorption (ERR) cavities may be challenging, especially when no clinical signs are seen. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional intraoral film radiography, charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, photostimulable phosphor pla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbas Shokri, Hamed Mortazavi, Fatemeh Salemi, Adineh Javadian, Hamidreza Bakhtiari, Hooman Matlabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-02-01
Series:Biomedical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=1;spage=18;epage=22;aulast=Shokri
_version_ 1817997740212224000
author Abbas Shokri
Hamed Mortazavi
Fatemeh Salemi
Adineh Javadian
Hamidreza Bakhtiari
Hooman Matlabi
author_facet Abbas Shokri
Hamed Mortazavi
Fatemeh Salemi
Adineh Javadian
Hamidreza Bakhtiari
Hooman Matlabi
author_sort Abbas Shokri
collection DOAJ
description Background: Diagnosis of external root resorption (ERR) cavities may be challenging, especially when no clinical signs are seen. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional intraoral film radiography, charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) detector, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the detection of ERR. Methods: The study sample comprised 54 maxillary first premolars. Cavities were created by using a low-speed handpiece with round diamond burs of 1 mm in diameter. Digital and conventional radiographs were taken from each tooth. Three observers examined all images for the presence of resorption cavities. Data were statistically analyzed with the χ2 test. The reliability and degrees of agreement were also determined by the mean of Cohen's Kappa analysis. Results: The differences between the imaging methods in correct detection of root resorption for all sizes were not significant. For locations of root resorption, significant differences were found between CBCT and other methods in the apical regions. Conclusions: CBCT was only useful for detection of cavities located in the apical one-third of the root, compared to other digital or conventional methods.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:41:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cba8a5144c4c4aa2be424161ae90b80c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2319-4170
2320-2890
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:41:44Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Biomedical Journal
spelling doaj.art-cba8a5144c4c4aa2be424161ae90b80c2022-12-22T02:16:54ZengElsevierBiomedical Journal2319-41702320-28902013-02-01361182210.4103/2319-4170.107156Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison StudyAbbas Shokri0Hamed Mortazavi1Fatemeh Salemi2 Adineh Javadian3Hamidreza Bakhtiari4Hooman Matlabi5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranDepartment of Oral Medicine, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranEmergency Unit, Eliad Clinic, Tehran, IranBackground: Diagnosis of external root resorption (ERR) cavities may be challenging, especially when no clinical signs are seen. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional intraoral film radiography, charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) detector, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the detection of ERR. Methods: The study sample comprised 54 maxillary first premolars. Cavities were created by using a low-speed handpiece with round diamond burs of 1 mm in diameter. Digital and conventional radiographs were taken from each tooth. Three observers examined all images for the presence of resorption cavities. Data were statistically analyzed with the χ2 test. The reliability and degrees of agreement were also determined by the mean of Cohen's Kappa analysis. Results: The differences between the imaging methods in correct detection of root resorption for all sizes were not significant. For locations of root resorption, significant differences were found between CBCT and other methods in the apical regions. Conclusions: CBCT was only useful for detection of cavities located in the apical one-third of the root, compared to other digital or conventional methods.http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=1;spage=18;epage=22;aulast=Shokriconventional radiographydiagnosisdigital radiography
spellingShingle Abbas Shokri
Hamed Mortazavi
Fatemeh Salemi
Adineh Javadian
Hamidreza Bakhtiari
Hooman Matlabi
Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
Biomedical Journal
conventional radiography
diagnosis
digital radiography
title Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
title_full Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
title_short Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption Using Conventional Intraoral Film Radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: A Comparison Study
title_sort diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography ccd psp and cbct a comparison study
topic conventional radiography
diagnosis
digital radiography
url http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=1;spage=18;epage=22;aulast=Shokri
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasshokri diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy
AT hamedmortazavi diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy
AT fatemehsalemi diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy
AT adinehjavadian diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy
AT hamidrezabakhtiari diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy
AT hoomanmatlabi diagnosisofsimulatedexternalrootresorptionusingconventionalintraoralfilmradiographyccdpspandcbctacomparisonstudy