ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ

World practice shows that the number of the most widespread knowledge-intensive territorial entities (KITE) includes: clusters, technopolis, technology parks, innovative business incubators of technological orientation.It is revealed that the formation of KITE is a long, complex, contradictory and n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. N. Dauranov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Economics under the Science Committee of Ministry of Education and Science RK 2018-09-01
Series:Экономика: стратегия и практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/41
_version_ 1797879335050280960
author I. N. Dauranov
author_facet I. N. Dauranov
author_sort I. N. Dauranov
collection DOAJ
description World practice shows that the number of the most widespread knowledge-intensive territorial entities (KITE) includes: clusters, technopolis, technology parks, innovative business incubators of technological orientation.It is revealed that the formation of KITE is a long, complex, contradictory and not always successful process. This is evidenced by world and national experience. The organizational and legal status of the KITE, its research and production and organizational structure, as well as the initiator and source of funding for KITE (state or private organizations) have an impact on the specific content of institutional management methods for this process.It is established that for the steadily developing regions, which have received the name “locomotives of growth”, the most effective is the use of the American and Chinese models of the technopark. In the American model, the main goal is to grow startups in highly technological sectors of the economy, and in China - to attract foreign investment and stimulate the development of high- tech industries.For regions rich in natural resources and depressive regions, the most suitable is the Japanese model of the technopark, the main objective of which is to increase industrial potential and equalize the level of economic development of the territories. It is characterized by direct state funding and management of the activities of the technopark.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:47:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbc128b3ca5e4a6eb2a70ee41119e9a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1997-9967
2663-550X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:47:08Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Institute of Economics under the Science Committee of Ministry of Education and Science RK
record_format Article
series Экономика: стратегия и практика
spelling doaj.art-cbc128b3ca5e4a6eb2a70ee41119e9a42023-03-13T07:45:28ZengInstitute of Economics under the Science Committee of Ministry of Education and Science RKЭкономика: стратегия и практика1997-99672663-550X2018-09-01039910939ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙI. N. Dauranov0ИНСТИТУТ ЭКОНОМИКИ КОМИТЕТА НАУКИ МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РКWorld practice shows that the number of the most widespread knowledge-intensive territorial entities (KITE) includes: clusters, technopolis, technology parks, innovative business incubators of technological orientation.It is revealed that the formation of KITE is a long, complex, contradictory and not always successful process. This is evidenced by world and national experience. The organizational and legal status of the KITE, its research and production and organizational structure, as well as the initiator and source of funding for KITE (state or private organizations) have an impact on the specific content of institutional management methods for this process.It is established that for the steadily developing regions, which have received the name “locomotives of growth”, the most effective is the use of the American and Chinese models of the technopark. In the American model, the main goal is to grow startups in highly technological sectors of the economy, and in China - to attract foreign investment and stimulate the development of high- tech industries.For regions rich in natural resources and depressive regions, the most suitable is the Japanese model of the technopark, the main objective of which is to increase industrial potential and equalize the level of economic development of the territories. It is characterized by direct state funding and management of the activities of the technopark.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/41институционалдық әдістерді басқаруғылыми сыйымды аумақтық құрылымдарды қалыптастыру үрдісікластерлертехнопарктербизнес- инкубаторлар
spellingShingle I. N. Dauranov
ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
Экономика: стратегия и практика
институционалдық әдістерді басқару
ғылыми сыйымды аумақтық құрылымдарды қалыптастыру үрдісі
кластерлер
технопарктер
бизнес- инкубаторлар
title ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
title_full ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
title_fullStr ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
title_full_unstemmed ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
title_short ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ МЕТОДЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ
title_sort институциональные методы управления процессом формирования наукоемких территориальных образований
topic институционалдық әдістерді басқару
ғылыми сыйымды аумақтық құрылымдарды қалыптастыру үрдісі
кластерлер
технопарктер
бизнес- инкубаторлар
url https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/41
work_keys_str_mv AT indauranov institucionalʹnyemetodyupravleniâprocessomformirovaniânaukoemkihterritorialʹnyhobrazovanij