Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background Up to 30% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) experience minimal symptomatic benefit or die within 1 year, indicating an urgent need for enhanced patient selection. Previous analyses of baseline NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide) and TAV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher J. Allen, Jubin Joseph, Tiffany Patterson, Matthew Hammond‐Haley, Hannah Z. R. McConkey, Bernard D. Prendergast, Michael Marber, Simon R. Redwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017574
_version_ 1818327970828255232
author Christopher J. Allen
Jubin Joseph
Tiffany Patterson
Matthew Hammond‐Haley
Hannah Z. R. McConkey
Bernard D. Prendergast
Michael Marber
Simon R. Redwood
author_facet Christopher J. Allen
Jubin Joseph
Tiffany Patterson
Matthew Hammond‐Haley
Hannah Z. R. McConkey
Bernard D. Prendergast
Michael Marber
Simon R. Redwood
author_sort Christopher J. Allen
collection DOAJ
description Background Up to 30% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) experience minimal symptomatic benefit or die within 1 year, indicating an urgent need for enhanced patient selection. Previous analyses of baseline NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide) and TAVI outcomes have assumed a linear relationship, yielding conflicting results. We reexamined the relationship between baseline NT‐proBNP and symptomatic improvement after TAVI. Methods and Results Symptom status, clinical and echocardiographic data, and baseline NT‐proBNP were reviewed from 144 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The primary end point was change in New York Heart Association functional class at 1 year. There was a nonlinear, inverted‐U relationship between log‐baseline NT‐proBNP and post‐TAVI change in NYHA class (R2=0.4559). NT‐proBNP thresholds of <800 and >10 000 ng/L accurately predicted no symptomatic improvement at 1 year (sensitivity 88%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 72%, negative predictive value 93%). In adjusted analyses, baseline NT‐proBNP outside this “sweet‐spot” range was the only factor independently associated with poor functional outcome (high: NT‐proBNP >10 000 ng/L, odds ratio [OR], 65; 95% CI, 6–664; low: NT‐proBNP <800 ng/L, OR, 73; 95% CI, 7–738). Conclusions Baseline NT‐proBNP is a useful prognostic marker to predict poor symptom relief after TAVI and may indicate when intervention is likely to be futile. Both low (<800 ng/L) and very high (>10 000 ng/L) levels are strongly associated with poor functional outcome, suggesting an alternative cause for symptoms in the former scenario and an irrevocably diseased left ventricle in the latter. Further evaluation of this relationship is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:24:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbcae2c91793479cba8b4afc232d73f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:24:44Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-cbcae2c91793479cba8b4afc232d73f02022-12-21T23:46:24ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-12-0192310.1161/JAHA.120.017574Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationChristopher J. Allen0Jubin Joseph1Tiffany Patterson2Matthew Hammond‐Haley3Hannah Z. R. McConkey4Bernard D. Prendergast5Michael Marber6Simon R. Redwood7Cardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomCardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomCardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology Guys’ and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust London United KingdomCardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology Guys’ and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust London United KingdomCardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomCardiovascular Division St. Thomas HospitalKing's College London London United KingdomBackground Up to 30% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) experience minimal symptomatic benefit or die within 1 year, indicating an urgent need for enhanced patient selection. Previous analyses of baseline NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide) and TAVI outcomes have assumed a linear relationship, yielding conflicting results. We reexamined the relationship between baseline NT‐proBNP and symptomatic improvement after TAVI. Methods and Results Symptom status, clinical and echocardiographic data, and baseline NT‐proBNP were reviewed from 144 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The primary end point was change in New York Heart Association functional class at 1 year. There was a nonlinear, inverted‐U relationship between log‐baseline NT‐proBNP and post‐TAVI change in NYHA class (R2=0.4559). NT‐proBNP thresholds of <800 and >10 000 ng/L accurately predicted no symptomatic improvement at 1 year (sensitivity 88%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 72%, negative predictive value 93%). In adjusted analyses, baseline NT‐proBNP outside this “sweet‐spot” range was the only factor independently associated with poor functional outcome (high: NT‐proBNP >10 000 ng/L, odds ratio [OR], 65; 95% CI, 6–664; low: NT‐proBNP <800 ng/L, OR, 73; 95% CI, 7–738). Conclusions Baseline NT‐proBNP is a useful prognostic marker to predict poor symptom relief after TAVI and may indicate when intervention is likely to be futile. Both low (<800 ng/L) and very high (>10 000 ng/L) levels are strongly associated with poor functional outcome, suggesting an alternative cause for symptoms in the former scenario and an irrevocably diseased left ventricle in the latter. Further evaluation of this relationship is warranted.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017574aortic stenosisNT‐proBNPtranscutaneous aortic valve implantationtransfemoral aortic valve implantation
spellingShingle Christopher J. Allen
Jubin Joseph
Tiffany Patterson
Matthew Hammond‐Haley
Hannah Z. R. McConkey
Bernard D. Prendergast
Michael Marber
Simon R. Redwood
Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
aortic stenosis
NT‐proBNP
transcutaneous aortic valve implantation
transfemoral aortic valve implantation
title Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_fullStr Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_short Baseline NT‐proBNP Accurately Predicts Symptom Response to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_sort baseline nt probnp accurately predicts symptom response to transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic aortic stenosis
NT‐proBNP
transcutaneous aortic valve implantation
transfemoral aortic valve implantation
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017574
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjallen baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT jubinjoseph baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT tiffanypatterson baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT matthewhammondhaley baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT hannahzrmcconkey baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT bernarddprendergast baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT michaelmarber baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT simonrredwood baselinentprobnpaccuratelypredictssymptomresponsetotranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation