Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) lists 1571 as the year of the first recorded use of the English word ‘masculinity’; the Ancient Greek <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent=&q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ognjen Arandjelović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Sexes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5118/4/4/29
_version_ 1797379383548182528
author Ognjen Arandjelović
author_facet Ognjen Arandjelović
author_sort Ognjen Arandjelović
collection DOAJ
description The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) lists 1571 as the year of the first recorded use of the English word ‘masculinity’; the Ancient Greek <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="true"><mi>α</mi><mo>˘</mo></mover><mi>ν</mi><mi>δ</mi><mi>ρ</mi><mi>ϵ</mi><mover accent="true"><mi>ι</mi><mo>´</mo></mover><mover accent="true"><mi>α</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (<i>andreia</i>), usually translated as ‘courage’, was also used to refer to manliness. The notion of manliness or masculinity is undoubtedly older still. Yet, despite this seeming familiarity, not only is the notion proving to be highly elusive, its understanding by the society being in a constant flux, but is also one which is at the root of bitter division and confrontation, and which has tangible and far-reaching real-world effects. At the same time, while masculinity has been attracting an increasing amount of attention in academia, the large body of published work seldom goes to the very foundations of the issue, failing to explicitly and with clarity reach a consensus as to how masculinity <i>ought</i> to be understood. Herein, I critique the leading contemporary thought, showing it to be poorly conceived and confounded, and often lacking in substance which would raise it to the level of the actionable and constructive. Hence, I propose an alternative view which is void of the observed deficiencies, and discuss how its adoption would facilitate a conciliation between the currently warring factions, focusing everybody’s efforts on addressing the actual ethical, deconfounded of specious distractions.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:22:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbd872a009154f938114adef52fca8dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-5118
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:22:27Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sexes
spelling doaj.art-cbd872a009154f938114adef52fca8dd2023-12-22T14:42:12ZengMDPI AGSexes2411-51182023-09-014444846110.3390/sexes4040029Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity ItselfOgnjen Arandjelović0School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9SX, UKThe Oxford English Dictionary (OED) lists 1571 as the year of the first recorded use of the English word ‘masculinity’; the Ancient Greek <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mover accent="true"><mi>α</mi><mo>˘</mo></mover><mi>ν</mi><mi>δ</mi><mi>ρ</mi><mi>ϵ</mi><mover accent="true"><mi>ι</mi><mo>´</mo></mover><mover accent="true"><mi>α</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (<i>andreia</i>), usually translated as ‘courage’, was also used to refer to manliness. The notion of manliness or masculinity is undoubtedly older still. Yet, despite this seeming familiarity, not only is the notion proving to be highly elusive, its understanding by the society being in a constant flux, but is also one which is at the root of bitter division and confrontation, and which has tangible and far-reaching real-world effects. At the same time, while masculinity has been attracting an increasing amount of attention in academia, the large body of published work seldom goes to the very foundations of the issue, failing to explicitly and with clarity reach a consensus as to how masculinity <i>ought</i> to be understood. Herein, I critique the leading contemporary thought, showing it to be poorly conceived and confounded, and often lacking in substance which would raise it to the level of the actionable and constructive. Hence, I propose an alternative view which is void of the observed deficiencies, and discuss how its adoption would facilitate a conciliation between the currently warring factions, focusing everybody’s efforts on addressing the actual ethical, deconfounded of specious distractions.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5118/4/4/29gendersexfemininitytoxicgentler
spellingShingle Ognjen Arandjelović
Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
Sexes
gender
sex
femininity
toxic
gentler
title Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
title_full Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
title_fullStr Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
title_full_unstemmed Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
title_short Masculinity and the Questions of “Is” and “Ought”: Revisiting the Definition of the Notion of Masculinity Itself
title_sort masculinity and the questions of is and ought revisiting the definition of the notion of masculinity itself
topic gender
sex
femininity
toxic
gentler
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5118/4/4/29
work_keys_str_mv AT ognjenarandjelovic masculinityandthequestionsofisandoughtrevisitingthedefinitionofthenotionofmasculinityitself