Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementing new practices, such as health information technology (HIT), is often difficult due to the disruption of the highly coordinated, interdependent processes (<it>e.g.</it>, information exchange, communication, re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McDaniel Reuben R, Anderson Ruth A, Kitzmiller Rebecca R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/95
_version_ 1818791573942435840
author McDaniel Reuben R
Anderson Ruth A
Kitzmiller Rebecca R
author_facet McDaniel Reuben R
Anderson Ruth A
Kitzmiller Rebecca R
author_sort McDaniel Reuben R
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementing new practices, such as health information technology (HIT), is often difficult due to the disruption of the highly coordinated, interdependent processes (<it>e.g.</it>, information exchange, communication, relationships) of providing care in hospitals. Thus, HIT implementation may occur slowly as staff members observe and make sense of unexpected disruptions in care. As a critical organizational function, sensemaking, defined as the social process of searching for answers and meaning which drive action, leads to unified understanding, learning, and effective problem solving -- strategies that studies have linked to successful change. Project teamwork is a change strategy increasingly used by hospitals that facilitates sensemaking by providing a formal mechanism for team members to share ideas, construct the meaning of events, and take next actions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this longitudinal case study, we aim to examine project teams' sensemaking and action as the team prepares to implement new information technology in a tiertiary care hospital. Based on management and healthcare literature on HIT implementation and project teamwork, we chose sensemaking as an alternative to traditional models for understanding organizational change and teamwork. Our methods choices are derived from this conceptual framework. Data on project team interactions will be prospectively collected through direct observation and organizational document review. Through qualitative methods, we will identify sensemaking patterns and explore variation in sensemaking across teams. Participant demographics will be used to explore variation in sensemaking patterns.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Outcomes of this research will be new knowledge about sensemaking patterns of project teams, such as: the antecedents and consequences of the ongoing, evolutionary, social process of implementing HIT; the internal and external factors that influence the project team, including team composition, team member interaction, and interaction between the project team and the larger organization; the ways in which internal and external factors influence project team processes; and the ways in which project team processes facilitate team task accomplishment. These findings will lead to new methods of implementing HIT in hospitals.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T15:13:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbdd7c77003948b3be85d538e74409d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-5908
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T15:13:30Z
publishDate 2010-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science
spelling doaj.art-cbdd7c77003948b3be85d538e74409d52022-12-21T21:03:35ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082010-11-01519510.1186/1748-5908-5-95Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocolMcDaniel Reuben RAnderson Ruth AKitzmiller Rebecca R<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementing new practices, such as health information technology (HIT), is often difficult due to the disruption of the highly coordinated, interdependent processes (<it>e.g.</it>, information exchange, communication, relationships) of providing care in hospitals. Thus, HIT implementation may occur slowly as staff members observe and make sense of unexpected disruptions in care. As a critical organizational function, sensemaking, defined as the social process of searching for answers and meaning which drive action, leads to unified understanding, learning, and effective problem solving -- strategies that studies have linked to successful change. Project teamwork is a change strategy increasingly used by hospitals that facilitates sensemaking by providing a formal mechanism for team members to share ideas, construct the meaning of events, and take next actions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this longitudinal case study, we aim to examine project teams' sensemaking and action as the team prepares to implement new information technology in a tiertiary care hospital. Based on management and healthcare literature on HIT implementation and project teamwork, we chose sensemaking as an alternative to traditional models for understanding organizational change and teamwork. Our methods choices are derived from this conceptual framework. Data on project team interactions will be prospectively collected through direct observation and organizational document review. Through qualitative methods, we will identify sensemaking patterns and explore variation in sensemaking across teams. Participant demographics will be used to explore variation in sensemaking patterns.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Outcomes of this research will be new knowledge about sensemaking patterns of project teams, such as: the antecedents and consequences of the ongoing, evolutionary, social process of implementing HIT; the internal and external factors that influence the project team, including team composition, team member interaction, and interaction between the project team and the larger organization; the ways in which internal and external factors influence project team processes; and the ways in which project team processes facilitate team task accomplishment. These findings will lead to new methods of implementing HIT in hospitals.</p>http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/95
spellingShingle McDaniel Reuben R
Anderson Ruth A
Kitzmiller Rebecca R
Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
Implementation Science
title Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
title_full Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
title_fullStr Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
title_short Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol
title_sort making sense of health information technology implementation a qualitative study protocol
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/95
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdanielreubenr makingsenseofhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT andersonrutha makingsenseofhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT kitzmillerrebeccar makingsenseofhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationaqualitativestudyprotocol