The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability

The present article investigates how the EU climate and energy governance framework launched by the European Green Deal has been affected by the exogenous shock of the Russian war of aggression on Ukraine. Harnessing punctuated equilibrium theory, the theoretical approach applies its conceptual tria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frank Wendler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2023-12-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7343
_version_ 1797372746817077248
author Frank Wendler
author_facet Frank Wendler
author_sort Frank Wendler
collection DOAJ
description The present article investigates how the EU climate and energy governance framework launched by the European Green Deal has been affected by the exogenous shock of the Russian war of aggression on Ukraine. Harnessing punctuated equilibrium theory, the theoretical approach applies its conceptual triad of policy images, venues, and feedback to the adoption of the current REPowerEU program as a critical test case of highly stable policy-making encountering a situation of exogenous shock. In the empirical part, a mixed-method content analysis of policy documents issued by the European Council and Commission from the adoption of the European Green Deal in 2019 to the current stage is presented to gauge the impact of the Russian attack on agenda-setting at the macro and meso-political levels of the EU. A second step evaluates how the expanded and more geopolitical policy image of the REPowerEU agenda is applied to extant governance processes. In this regard, the analysis identifies three factors limiting the impact of exogenous shock: the availability of three separate policy subsystems for the parallel processing of policy components, institutional safeguards for maintaining policy stability through supranational rules and provisions, and the critical function of the Commission in limiting revisions to a few targeted proposals. In conclusion, policy stability outweighs aspects of disruption and change, while the more diverse set of policy processes creates new challenges for the coherence of efforts to achieve decarbonization.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:40:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbe97e19ecf34fe4be748cb72e22bb87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-2463
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:40:17Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Politics and Governance
spelling doaj.art-cbe97e19ecf34fe4be748cb72e22bb872023-12-29T09:44:17ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632023-12-0111435236410.17645/pag.v11i4.73433374The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making StabilityFrank Wendler0Center for Sustainable Society Research, University of Hamburg, GermanyThe present article investigates how the EU climate and energy governance framework launched by the European Green Deal has been affected by the exogenous shock of the Russian war of aggression on Ukraine. Harnessing punctuated equilibrium theory, the theoretical approach applies its conceptual triad of policy images, venues, and feedback to the adoption of the current REPowerEU program as a critical test case of highly stable policy-making encountering a situation of exogenous shock. In the empirical part, a mixed-method content analysis of policy documents issued by the European Council and Commission from the adoption of the European Green Deal in 2019 to the current stage is presented to gauge the impact of the Russian attack on agenda-setting at the macro and meso-political levels of the EU. A second step evaluates how the expanded and more geopolitical policy image of the REPowerEU agenda is applied to extant governance processes. In this regard, the analysis identifies three factors limiting the impact of exogenous shock: the availability of three separate policy subsystems for the parallel processing of policy components, institutional safeguards for maintaining policy stability through supranational rules and provisions, and the critical function of the Commission in limiting revisions to a few targeted proposals. In conclusion, policy stability outweighs aspects of disruption and change, while the more diverse set of policy processes creates new challenges for the coherence of efforts to achieve decarbonization.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7343agenda‐settingclimate changeeuropean green dealpunctuated equilibrium theoryrepowereu
spellingShingle Frank Wendler
The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
Politics and Governance
agenda‐setting
climate change
european green deal
punctuated equilibrium theory
repowereu
title The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
title_full The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
title_fullStr The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
title_full_unstemmed The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
title_short The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability
title_sort european green deal agenda after the attack on ukraine exogenous shock meets policy making stability
topic agenda‐setting
climate change
european green deal
punctuated equilibrium theory
repowereu
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7343
work_keys_str_mv AT frankwendler theeuropeangreendealagendaaftertheattackonukraineexogenousshockmeetspolicymakingstability
AT frankwendler europeangreendealagendaaftertheattackonukraineexogenousshockmeetspolicymakingstability