Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol

2.64% is the largest defect percentage of aerosol can product of PT Multi Makmur Indah Industri. To improve the product quality, the study focused on the goal of reducing the percentage of defects using the Statistical Quality Control. After gaining control of the company, we can calculate the proce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rida Zuraida, Bima Rantautama, Notri Sutrisnohadi, Chondro Dewo Adi Pratomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bina Nusantara University 2012-06-01
Series:ComTech
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/comtech/article/view/2457
_version_ 1797710189905838080
author Rida Zuraida
Bima Rantautama
Notri Sutrisnohadi
Chondro Dewo Adi Pratomo
author_facet Rida Zuraida
Bima Rantautama
Notri Sutrisnohadi
Chondro Dewo Adi Pratomo
author_sort Rida Zuraida
collection DOAJ
description 2.64% is the largest defect percentage of aerosol can product of PT Multi Makmur Indah Industri. To improve the product quality, the study focused on the goal of reducing the percentage of defects using the Statistical Quality Control. After gaining control of the company, we can calculate the process capability in the aerosol can manufacture. The next step is identification of the defects causes that arise using the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method to measure the defect causes risks and as an input in determining control recommendations. From the observations and data processing, it is recognized that the overall phase of the process has a process capability value above 99%. 80% of defects in the aerosol cans product occur during the process of can making, component making and printing. While the most risking defect cause is the destruction of machine B coating on the printing process (RPN = 245) and the quality of the welding wire on can manufacturing process (RPN = 160). Therefore, the solution to reduce the defect percentage is replacing the damaged coating machine B as well as upgrading the quality of the welding wire. Thus, it can reduce the loss sale as much as 1.06% (Rp110,716,000) per month.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:48:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cbef38c12f0644019e858f3d4e8e061f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2087-1244
2476-907X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:48:36Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Bina Nusantara University
record_format Article
series ComTech
spelling doaj.art-cbef38c12f0644019e858f3d4e8e061f2023-09-03T00:27:13ZengBina Nusantara UniversityComTech2087-12442476-907X2012-06-013158459410.21512/comtech.v3i1.24571869Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng AeorosolRida Zuraida0Bima Rantautama1Notri Sutrisnohadi2Chondro Dewo Adi Pratomo3Bina Nusantara UniversityBina Nusantara UniversityBina Nusantara UniversityBina Nusantara University2.64% is the largest defect percentage of aerosol can product of PT Multi Makmur Indah Industri. To improve the product quality, the study focused on the goal of reducing the percentage of defects using the Statistical Quality Control. After gaining control of the company, we can calculate the process capability in the aerosol can manufacture. The next step is identification of the defects causes that arise using the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method to measure the defect causes risks and as an input in determining control recommendations. From the observations and data processing, it is recognized that the overall phase of the process has a process capability value above 99%. 80% of defects in the aerosol cans product occur during the process of can making, component making and printing. While the most risking defect cause is the destruction of machine B coating on the printing process (RPN = 245) and the quality of the welding wire on can manufacturing process (RPN = 160). Therefore, the solution to reduce the defect percentage is replacing the damaged coating machine B as well as upgrading the quality of the welding wire. Thus, it can reduce the loss sale as much as 1.06% (Rp110,716,000) per month.https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/comtech/article/view/2457statistical quality control (SQC), failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), aeorosol can
spellingShingle Rida Zuraida
Bima Rantautama
Notri Sutrisnohadi
Chondro Dewo Adi Pratomo
Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
ComTech
statistical quality control (SQC), failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), aeorosol can
title Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
title_full Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
title_fullStr Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
title_full_unstemmed Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
title_short Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Meminimalkan Jumlah Cacat pada Produk Kaleng Aeorosol
title_sort pengendalian kualitas untuk meminimalkan jumlah cacat pada produk kaleng aeorosol
topic statistical quality control (SQC), failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), aeorosol can
url https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/comtech/article/view/2457
work_keys_str_mv AT ridazuraida pengendaliankualitasuntukmeminimalkanjumlahcacatpadaprodukkalengaeorosol
AT bimarantautama pengendaliankualitasuntukmeminimalkanjumlahcacatpadaprodukkalengaeorosol
AT notrisutrisnohadi pengendaliankualitasuntukmeminimalkanjumlahcacatpadaprodukkalengaeorosol
AT chondrodewoadipratomo pengendaliankualitasuntukmeminimalkanjumlahcacatpadaprodukkalengaeorosol