Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators

Abstract Within a population of apex predators, differences among individuals can influence both their ecological impact and their vulnerability to threatening processes. Our field studies on a large monitor lizard (Varanus panoptes) in the Australian wet–dry tropics show that diets shift seasonally...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Ward‐Fear, R. Shine, G. P. Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3136
_version_ 1818550296848105472
author G. Ward‐Fear
R. Shine
G. P. Brown
author_facet G. Ward‐Fear
R. Shine
G. P. Brown
author_sort G. Ward‐Fear
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Within a population of apex predators, differences among individuals can influence both their ecological impact and their vulnerability to threatening processes. Our field studies on a large monitor lizard (Varanus panoptes) in the Australian wet–dry tropics show that diets shift seasonally and depend upon a lizard’s sex and body size. Individuals that had previously been recorded to consume frogs were most at risk following biological invasion by toxic cane toads (Rhinella marina), as were individuals with broad diets during the wet season. As a result, mortality of those individual predators likely reduced predation pressure on other taxa (invertebrates and reptiles) that were frequently consumed by the same lizards that ate frogs, but with less benefit for taxa (e.g., rodents) that were consumed by non‐anuran‐eating individuals within the predator population. In particular, individuals killed by cane toads often had consumed agamid lizards, a group whose abundance has been reported to increase due to toad‐induced mortality of V. panoptes. To understand the vulnerability of apex predators, or the ecological consequences of their extirpation, we need to incorporate the role of variation among individuals in critical ecological traits.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:44:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc2326d53dd243e682edefc9c46420f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:44:34Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-cc2326d53dd243e682edefc9c46420f02022-12-22T00:30:38ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252020-10-011110n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3136Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predatorsG. Ward‐Fear0R. Shine1G. P. Brown2School of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales 2006 AustraliaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales 2006 AustraliaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales 2006 AustraliaAbstract Within a population of apex predators, differences among individuals can influence both their ecological impact and their vulnerability to threatening processes. Our field studies on a large monitor lizard (Varanus panoptes) in the Australian wet–dry tropics show that diets shift seasonally and depend upon a lizard’s sex and body size. Individuals that had previously been recorded to consume frogs were most at risk following biological invasion by toxic cane toads (Rhinella marina), as were individuals with broad diets during the wet season. As a result, mortality of those individual predators likely reduced predation pressure on other taxa (invertebrates and reptiles) that were frequently consumed by the same lizards that ate frogs, but with less benefit for taxa (e.g., rodents) that were consumed by non‐anuran‐eating individuals within the predator population. In particular, individuals killed by cane toads often had consumed agamid lizards, a group whose abundance has been reported to increase due to toad‐induced mortality of V. panoptes. To understand the vulnerability of apex predators, or the ecological consequences of their extirpation, we need to incorporate the role of variation among individuals in critical ecological traits.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3136biological invasiondietectothermynichereptiletrophic cascade
spellingShingle G. Ward‐Fear
R. Shine
G. P. Brown
Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
Ecosphere
biological invasion
diet
ectothermy
niche
reptile
trophic cascade
title Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
title_full Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
title_fullStr Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
title_full_unstemmed Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
title_short Within‐population variation in dietary traits: implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
title_sort within population variation in dietary traits implications for vulnerability and impact of imperiled keystone predators
topic biological invasion
diet
ectothermy
niche
reptile
trophic cascade
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3136
work_keys_str_mv AT gwardfear withinpopulationvariationindietarytraitsimplicationsforvulnerabilityandimpactofimperiledkeystonepredators
AT rshine withinpopulationvariationindietarytraitsimplicationsforvulnerabilityandimpactofimperiledkeystonepredators
AT gpbrown withinpopulationvariationindietarytraitsimplicationsforvulnerabilityandimpactofimperiledkeystonepredators