Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity
This paper discusses alignment patterns in three-participant constructions in Blackfoot (Western Algonquian; Canada, USA). We demonstrate the effects of referential hierarchies relating to animacy, person and specificity. Blackfoot verbs stem are subcategorized for transitivity and the animacy of S...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dartmouth College Library
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | Linguistic Discovery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.416 |
| _version_ | 1818932317129801728 |
|---|---|
| author | Lena Russell Inge Genee Eva van Lier Fernando Zúñiga |
| author_facet | Lena Russell Inge Genee Eva van Lier Fernando Zúñiga |
| author_sort | Lena Russell |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper discusses alignment patterns in three-participant constructions in Blackfoot (Western Algonquian; Canada, USA). We demonstrate the effects of referential hierarchies relating to animacy, person and specificity. Blackfoot verbs stem are subcategorized for transitivity and the animacy of S (for intransitives) and P(atient), R(ecipient), T(heme), or B(eneficiary) (for (di)transitives), showing crossreference with at most two participants. Nonspecific participants are never crossreferenced, resulting in the possibility of constructions with three or even four participants, only one of which is crossreferenced on the verb. Even when all participants in a three-participant construction are specific, only two can be crossreferenced on the verb: the A and what is generally called the ‘primary object’ in Algonquian studies (T, R or B depending on the specific stem in question). Any remaining participants are not crossreferenced on the verb, irrespective of their specificity status. Whether T, R or B is chosen to be the primary object is lexically determined by the verbal stem, and more in particular by the so-called ‘final’, a derivational morpheme which closes every verb stem in Blackfoot. While Algonquian languages are often thought to display only secundative alignment, in line with the overwhelming importance of animacy in their grammars, we show that some stems require indirective alignment, while others allow for both configurations. Cross-referencing of A and B occurs as a result of applicativization with a benefactive final, which downgrades any potentially present T and/or R participants to noncrossreferenced objects. Finally, Blackfoot allows for a form of marking additional participants by a preverbal element called a ‘relative root’, which licenses a participant without influencing crossreferencing patterns and without indicating the specificity or animacy of the licensed participant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:30:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cc23d28f77b74b7da0add8fcdc7de708 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1537-0852 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:30:34Z |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Dartmouth College Library |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Linguistic Discovery |
| spelling | doaj.art-cc23d28f77b74b7da0add8fcdc7de7082022-12-21T19:53:23ZengDartmouth College LibraryLinguistic Discovery1537-08522012-01-0110310.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.416416Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and SpecificityLena RussellInge GeneeEva van LierFernando ZúñigaThis paper discusses alignment patterns in three-participant constructions in Blackfoot (Western Algonquian; Canada, USA). We demonstrate the effects of referential hierarchies relating to animacy, person and specificity. Blackfoot verbs stem are subcategorized for transitivity and the animacy of S (for intransitives) and P(atient), R(ecipient), T(heme), or B(eneficiary) (for (di)transitives), showing crossreference with at most two participants. Nonspecific participants are never crossreferenced, resulting in the possibility of constructions with three or even four participants, only one of which is crossreferenced on the verb. Even when all participants in a three-participant construction are specific, only two can be crossreferenced on the verb: the A and what is generally called the ‘primary object’ in Algonquian studies (T, R or B depending on the specific stem in question). Any remaining participants are not crossreferenced on the verb, irrespective of their specificity status. Whether T, R or B is chosen to be the primary object is lexically determined by the verbal stem, and more in particular by the so-called ‘final’, a derivational morpheme which closes every verb stem in Blackfoot. While Algonquian languages are often thought to display only secundative alignment, in line with the overwhelming importance of animacy in their grammars, we show that some stems require indirective alignment, while others allow for both configurations. Cross-referencing of A and B occurs as a result of applicativization with a benefactive final, which downgrades any potentially present T and/or R participants to noncrossreferenced objects. Finally, Blackfoot allows for a form of marking additional participants by a preverbal element called a ‘relative root’, which licenses a participant without influencing crossreferencing patterns and without indicating the specificity or animacy of the licensed participant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.416alignmentAlgonquianbenefactivereferential hierarchyapplicative |
| spellingShingle | Lena Russell Inge Genee Eva van Lier Fernando Zúñiga Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity Linguistic Discovery alignment Algonquian benefactive referential hierarchy applicative |
| title | Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity |
| title_full | Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity |
| title_fullStr | Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity |
| title_short | Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Blackfoot: The Effects of Animacy, Person, and Specificity |
| title_sort | referential hierarchies in three participant constructions in blackfoot the effects of animacy person and specificity |
| topic | alignment Algonquian benefactive referential hierarchy applicative |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.416 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lenarussell referentialhierarchiesinthreeparticipantconstructionsinblackfoottheeffectsofanimacypersonandspecificity AT ingegenee referentialhierarchiesinthreeparticipantconstructionsinblackfoottheeffectsofanimacypersonandspecificity AT evavanlier referentialhierarchiesinthreeparticipantconstructionsinblackfoottheeffectsofanimacypersonandspecificity AT fernandozuniga referentialhierarchiesinthreeparticipantconstructionsinblackfoottheeffectsofanimacypersonandspecificity |