Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is the common clinical entity, often caused by “wear and tear” changes that occur in the spine. In the younger population, cervical radiculopathy is a result of a disc herniation or an acute injury causing foraminal impingement of an exiting nerve, whereas in the o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amresh S Bhaganagare, S A Nagesh, B G Shrihari, Vikas Naik, M N Nagarjun, Balaji S Pai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=132;epage=135;aulast=Bhaganagare
_version_ 1818542754039332864
author Amresh S Bhaganagare
S A Nagesh
B G Shrihari
Vikas Naik
M N Nagarjun
Balaji S Pai
author_facet Amresh S Bhaganagare
S A Nagesh
B G Shrihari
Vikas Naik
M N Nagarjun
Balaji S Pai
author_sort Amresh S Bhaganagare
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cervical radiculopathy is the common clinical entity, often caused by “wear and tear” changes that occur in the spine. In the younger population, cervical radiculopathy is a result of a disc herniation or an acute injury causing foraminal impingement of an exiting nerve, whereas in the older individuals, it is due to foraminal narrowing from osteophyte formation, decreased disc height, and degenerative changes of the uncovertebral joints anteriorly and of the facet joints posteriorly. In most (75%–90%), cervical radiculopathy responds well to conservative treatment, whereas the remaining patients, who fail to achieve acceptable recovery with conservative modalities, alone need surgical decompression of the nerve root. Surgical interventions can be categorized into anterior and posterior approaches to the spine. Our study is focused on the surgical outcome of anterior discectomy with fusion versus posterior cervical discectomy with foraminotomy for cervical monoradiculopathy. Materials and Methods: Ours is a retrospective study including patients of one level unilateral posterolateral cervical disc prolapse with radiculopathy operated in Department of Neurosurgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute between 2012 and June 2016. The hospital records, imagings, operation notes, and follow-up records were reviewed and analyzed. One hundred and fourteen patients of cervical monoradiculopathy were investigated and operated, 76 operated by anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), and 38 operated by posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (PCL). Results: The average operation time in 76 patients of ACDF group was 178 min and in 38 patients of PCL group was 72 min. Sixty-nine (91%) patients of ACDF and 38 (100%) patients of PCL had symptomatic relief but statistically (P > 0.5) was not significant. Three patients in ACDF group had hoarseness of voice due to recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and there were no fresh permanent neurological deficits in any patients of PCL group over a follow-up period of 36 months. The average postoperative hospital stay was 5 days in ACDF group and 3 days in PCL group. The average intraoperative blood loss was <50 ml in ACDF group and 650 ml in PCL group. The need of analgesic for pain arising from bone graft site in ACDF group was comparable with operative site pain in PCL group. Conclusions: PCL is a simple approach, yields gratifying results, and is a promising alternative in selected cases of cervical monoradiculopathy due to disc prolapse.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T22:26:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc2779966c054fa0894eecd06c83e4df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-8237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T22:26:17Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
spelling doaj.art-cc2779966c054fa0894eecd06c83e4df2022-12-22T00:48:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372017-01-018213213510.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_2_17Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experienceAmresh S BhaganagareS A NageshB G ShrihariVikas NaikM N NagarjunBalaji S PaiBackground: Cervical radiculopathy is the common clinical entity, often caused by “wear and tear” changes that occur in the spine. In the younger population, cervical radiculopathy is a result of a disc herniation or an acute injury causing foraminal impingement of an exiting nerve, whereas in the older individuals, it is due to foraminal narrowing from osteophyte formation, decreased disc height, and degenerative changes of the uncovertebral joints anteriorly and of the facet joints posteriorly. In most (75%–90%), cervical radiculopathy responds well to conservative treatment, whereas the remaining patients, who fail to achieve acceptable recovery with conservative modalities, alone need surgical decompression of the nerve root. Surgical interventions can be categorized into anterior and posterior approaches to the spine. Our study is focused on the surgical outcome of anterior discectomy with fusion versus posterior cervical discectomy with foraminotomy for cervical monoradiculopathy. Materials and Methods: Ours is a retrospective study including patients of one level unilateral posterolateral cervical disc prolapse with radiculopathy operated in Department of Neurosurgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute between 2012 and June 2016. The hospital records, imagings, operation notes, and follow-up records were reviewed and analyzed. One hundred and fourteen patients of cervical monoradiculopathy were investigated and operated, 76 operated by anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), and 38 operated by posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (PCL). Results: The average operation time in 76 patients of ACDF group was 178 min and in 38 patients of PCL group was 72 min. Sixty-nine (91%) patients of ACDF and 38 (100%) patients of PCL had symptomatic relief but statistically (P > 0.5) was not significant. Three patients in ACDF group had hoarseness of voice due to recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and there were no fresh permanent neurological deficits in any patients of PCL group over a follow-up period of 36 months. The average postoperative hospital stay was 5 days in ACDF group and 3 days in PCL group. The average intraoperative blood loss was <50 ml in ACDF group and 650 ml in PCL group. The need of analgesic for pain arising from bone graft site in ACDF group was comparable with operative site pain in PCL group. Conclusions: PCL is a simple approach, yields gratifying results, and is a promising alternative in selected cases of cervical monoradiculopathy due to disc prolapse.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=132;epage=135;aulast=BhaganagareAnterior cervical discectomy and fusioncervical monoradiculopathyposterior cervical laminoforaminotomy
spellingShingle Amresh S Bhaganagare
S A Nagesh
B G Shrihari
Vikas Naik
M N Nagarjun
Balaji S Pai
Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
cervical monoradiculopathy
posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy
title Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
title_full Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
title_fullStr Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
title_short Management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, an institutional experience
title_sort management of cervical monoradiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc an institutional experience
topic Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
cervical monoradiculopathy
posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=132;epage=135;aulast=Bhaganagare
work_keys_str_mv AT amreshsbhaganagare managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience
AT sanagesh managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience
AT bgshrihari managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience
AT vikasnaik managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience
AT mnnagarjun managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience
AT balajispai managementofcervicalmonoradiculopathyduetoprolapsedintervertebraldiscaninstitutionalexperience