A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions

The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chalitha Liyanage, Inam Nutkani, Lasantha Meegahapola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2024-01-01
Series:IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/
_version_ 1797206070342451200
author Chalitha Liyanage
Inam Nutkani
Lasantha Meegahapola
author_facet Chalitha Liyanage
Inam Nutkani
Lasantha Meegahapola
author_sort Chalitha Liyanage
collection DOAJ
description The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:01:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc3176a8f830463aaa7f4f2e09dce2e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2687-7910
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:01:10Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy
spelling doaj.art-cc3176a8f830463aaa7f4f2e09dce2e52024-04-15T23:01:18ZengIEEEIEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy2687-79102024-01-011117819510.1109/OAJPE.2024.338435410488377A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network ConditionsChalitha Liyanage0https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2656-0553Inam Nutkani1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-6649Lasantha Meegahapola2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-8471Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/Dynamic loadsfrequency stabilitygrid forming inverter (GFMI)system strengthvirtual synchronous generator (VSG)virtual inertia
spellingShingle Chalitha Liyanage
Inam Nutkani
Lasantha Meegahapola
A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy
Dynamic loads
frequency stability
grid forming inverter (GFMI)
system strength
virtual synchronous generator (VSG)
virtual inertia
title A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
title_sort comparative analysis of prominent virtual synchronous generator strategies under different network conditions
topic Dynamic loads
frequency stability
grid forming inverter (GFMI)
system strength
virtual synchronous generator (VSG)
virtual inertia
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/
work_keys_str_mv AT chalithaliyanage acomparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions
AT inamnutkani acomparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions
AT lasanthameegahapola acomparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions
AT chalithaliyanage comparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions
AT inamnutkani comparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions
AT lasanthameegahapola comparativeanalysisofprominentvirtualsynchronousgeneratorstrategiesunderdifferentnetworkconditions