Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners

Abstract To assess the value of electrocardiogram (ECG) RV5/V6 criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in marathons. A total of 112 marathon runners who met the requirements for “Class A1” events certified by the Chinese Athletics Association in Changzhou City were selected, and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pan Yang, Zhixiang Ge, Jinmei Gao, Xia Liu, Min Xu, Haiyan Ke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14692
_version_ 1797645190211567616
author Pan Yang
Zhixiang Ge
Jinmei Gao
Xia Liu
Min Xu
Haiyan Ke
author_facet Pan Yang
Zhixiang Ge
Jinmei Gao
Xia Liu
Min Xu
Haiyan Ke
author_sort Pan Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To assess the value of electrocardiogram (ECG) RV5/V6 criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in marathons. A total of 112 marathon runners who met the requirements for “Class A1” events certified by the Chinese Athletics Association in Changzhou City were selected, and their general clinical information was collected. ECG examinations were performed using a Fukuda FX7402 Cardimax Comprehensive Electrocardiograph Automatic Analyser, whereas routine cardiac ultrasound examinations were performed using a Philips EPIQ 7C echocardiography system. Real‐time 3‐dimensional echocardiography (RT‐3DE) was performed to acquire 3‐dimensional images of the left ventricle and to calculate the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). According to the LVMI criteria of the American Society of Echocardiography for the diagnosis of LVH, the participants were divided into an LVMI normal group (n = 96) and an LVH group (n = 16). The correlation between the ECG RV5/V6 criteria and LVH in marathon runners was analysed using multiple linear regression stratified by sex and compared with the Cornell (SV3 + RaVL), modified Cornell (SD + RaVL), Sokolow–Lyon (SV1 + RV5/V6), Peguero–Lo Presti (SD + SV4), SV1, SV3, SV4, and SD criteria. In marathon runners, the ECG parameters SV3 + RaVL, SD + RaVL, SV1 + RV5/V6, SD + SV4, SV3, SD, and RV5/V6 were able to identify LVH (all p < .05). When stratified by sex, linear regression analysis revealed that a significantly higher number of ECG RV5/V6 criteria were evident in the LVH group than in the LVMI normal group (p < .05), both with no adjustment and after initial adjustment (including age and body mass index), as well as after full adjustment (including age, body mass index, interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, left ventricular posterior wall thickness, and history of hypertension). Additionally, curve fitting showed that the ECG RV5/V6 values increased with increasing LVMI in marathon runners, exhibiting a nearly linear positive correlation. In conclusions, the ECG RV5/V6 criteria were correlated with LVH in marathon runners.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:42:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc36d64dfc394e358746622dabc2ff56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1524-6175
1751-7176
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:42:44Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
spelling doaj.art-cc36d64dfc394e358746622dabc2ff562023-10-30T13:26:37ZengWileyThe Journal of Clinical Hypertension1524-61751751-71762023-07-0125763864610.1111/jch.14692Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runnersPan Yang0Zhixiang Ge1Jinmei Gao2Xia Liu3Min Xu4Haiyan Ke5Department of Echocardiography of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaDepartment of Echocardiography of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaDepartment of Echocardiography of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaDepartment of Echocardiography of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaDepartment of Echocardiography of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Division of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Chang Zhou NO.1 Hospital Chang Zhou City Jiangsu Province ChinaAbstract To assess the value of electrocardiogram (ECG) RV5/V6 criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in marathons. A total of 112 marathon runners who met the requirements for “Class A1” events certified by the Chinese Athletics Association in Changzhou City were selected, and their general clinical information was collected. ECG examinations were performed using a Fukuda FX7402 Cardimax Comprehensive Electrocardiograph Automatic Analyser, whereas routine cardiac ultrasound examinations were performed using a Philips EPIQ 7C echocardiography system. Real‐time 3‐dimensional echocardiography (RT‐3DE) was performed to acquire 3‐dimensional images of the left ventricle and to calculate the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). According to the LVMI criteria of the American Society of Echocardiography for the diagnosis of LVH, the participants were divided into an LVMI normal group (n = 96) and an LVH group (n = 16). The correlation between the ECG RV5/V6 criteria and LVH in marathon runners was analysed using multiple linear regression stratified by sex and compared with the Cornell (SV3 + RaVL), modified Cornell (SD + RaVL), Sokolow–Lyon (SV1 + RV5/V6), Peguero–Lo Presti (SD + SV4), SV1, SV3, SV4, and SD criteria. In marathon runners, the ECG parameters SV3 + RaVL, SD + RaVL, SV1 + RV5/V6, SD + SV4, SV3, SD, and RV5/V6 were able to identify LVH (all p < .05). When stratified by sex, linear regression analysis revealed that a significantly higher number of ECG RV5/V6 criteria were evident in the LVH group than in the LVMI normal group (p < .05), both with no adjustment and after initial adjustment (including age and body mass index), as well as after full adjustment (including age, body mass index, interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, left ventricular posterior wall thickness, and history of hypertension). Additionally, curve fitting showed that the ECG RV5/V6 values increased with increasing LVMI in marathon runners, exhibiting a nearly linear positive correlation. In conclusions, the ECG RV5/V6 criteria were correlated with LVH in marathon runners.https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14692electrocardiogramleft ventricular hypertrophymarathon runnersRV5/V6 criteria
spellingShingle Pan Yang
Zhixiang Ge
Jinmei Gao
Xia Liu
Min Xu
Haiyan Ke
Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
electrocardiogram
left ventricular hypertrophy
marathon runners
RV5/V6 criteria
title Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
title_full Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
title_fullStr Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
title_short Evaluation of the electrocardiogram RV5/V6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
title_sort evaluation of the electrocardiogram rv5 v6 criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in marathon runners
topic electrocardiogram
left ventricular hypertrophy
marathon runners
RV5/V6 criteria
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14692
work_keys_str_mv AT panyang evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners
AT zhixiangge evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners
AT jinmeigao evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners
AT xialiu evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners
AT minxu evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners
AT haiyanke evaluationoftheelectrocardiogramrv5v6criteriainthediagnosisofleftventricularhypertrophyinmarathonrunners