Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation

The baking quality in the sets of both commercial and variety wheat samples (80 and 18 items) and wheat composite flour (standard and 25 blends) was evaluated in terms of the Solvent retention capacity method (AACC 56-11). Composites were prepared from a commercial fine wheat flour and commercial bi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivan Švec, Marie Hrušková, Jan Karas, Taťána Hofmanová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2012-10-01
Series:Czech Journal of Food Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-201205-0005_solvent-retention-capacity-for-different-wheats-and-flours-evaluation.php
_version_ 1797899770701807616
author Ivan Švec
Marie Hrušková
Jan Karas
Taťána Hofmanová
author_facet Ivan Švec
Marie Hrušková
Jan Karas
Taťána Hofmanová
author_sort Ivan Švec
collection DOAJ
description The baking quality in the sets of both commercial and variety wheat samples (80 and 18 items) and wheat composite flour (standard and 25 blends) was evaluated in terms of the Solvent retention capacity method (AACC 56-11). Composites were prepared from a commercial fine wheat flour and commercial bio-wholemeal flour prepared by milling of common wheat, rye, oat, barleys and corn at substitution levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%. The commercial wheat quality testing ANOVA revealed the major effect of the sample tested form; the data measured for grain and flour proved to be correlated. Besides, the harvest year affected the baking quality to a greater degree than the growing locality. Within the variety wheat set, the harvest year factor dominated over that of the wheat cultivar one with the exception of the sodium carbonate retention capacity. In the case of the wheat flour substitution by bio-cereal flour types, the added amount of the alternative flour supported only the quantitative change caused by the incorporated cereal in all four retention capacities.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:34:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc384bd6aaa54938bf10599a70ed78e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1212-1800
1805-9317
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:34:12Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
series Czech Journal of Food Sciences
spelling doaj.art-cc384bd6aaa54938bf10599a70ed78e72023-02-23T03:27:52ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesCzech Journal of Food Sciences1212-18001805-93172012-10-0130542943710.17221/386/2011-CJFScjf-201205-0005Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluationIvan Švec0Marie Hrušková1Jan Karas2Taťána Hofmanová3Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicThe baking quality in the sets of both commercial and variety wheat samples (80 and 18 items) and wheat composite flour (standard and 25 blends) was evaluated in terms of the Solvent retention capacity method (AACC 56-11). Composites were prepared from a commercial fine wheat flour and commercial bio-wholemeal flour prepared by milling of common wheat, rye, oat, barleys and corn at substitution levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%. The commercial wheat quality testing ANOVA revealed the major effect of the sample tested form; the data measured for grain and flour proved to be correlated. Besides, the harvest year affected the baking quality to a greater degree than the growing locality. Within the variety wheat set, the harvest year factor dominated over that of the wheat cultivar one with the exception of the sodium carbonate retention capacity. In the case of the wheat flour substitution by bio-cereal flour types, the added amount of the alternative flour supported only the quantitative change caused by the incorporated cereal in all four retention capacities.https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-201205-0005_solvent-retention-capacity-for-different-wheats-and-flours-evaluation.phpcommercial wheatwheat varietycomposite floursrctukey's test
spellingShingle Ivan Švec
Marie Hrušková
Jan Karas
Taťána Hofmanová
Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
Czech Journal of Food Sciences
commercial wheat
wheat variety
composite flour
src
tukey's test
title Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
title_full Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
title_fullStr Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
title_short Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
title_sort solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation
topic commercial wheat
wheat variety
composite flour
src
tukey's test
url https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-201205-0005_solvent-retention-capacity-for-different-wheats-and-flours-evaluation.php
work_keys_str_mv AT ivansvec solventretentioncapacityfordifferentwheatsandfloursevaluation
AT mariehruskova solventretentioncapacityfordifferentwheatsandfloursevaluation
AT jankaras solventretentioncapacityfordifferentwheatsandfloursevaluation
AT tatanahofmanova solventretentioncapacityfordifferentwheatsandfloursevaluation