Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana

Background: Laparoscopic Appendectomy [LA] is widely practiced than Open Appendectomy [OA] for the management of acute appendicitis1. It is still unclear in rural settings which procedure is more preferable. Aims and Objectives: The current study was done to compare the safety and the advantage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences 2019-04-01
Series:Perspectives In Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pimr.org.in/files-vol7-issue1-19/shailaja-vol-7-issue-1-2019.PDF
_version_ 1797462408035303424
author Shailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2
author_facet Shailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2
author_sort Shailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2
collection DOAJ
description Background: Laparoscopic Appendectomy [LA] is widely practiced than Open Appendectomy [OA] for the management of acute appendicitis1. It is still unclear in rural settings which procedure is more preferable. Aims and Objectives: The current study was done to compare the safety and the advantages of both the procedures in rural settings of Telangana state. Material and methods: One hundred and eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups, OA [Open Appendectomy group] and LA [Laparoscopic Appendectomy] group. Socio demographic parameters, primary outcome measures of the patients such as post operative pain, wound infection, hospital stay, operative duration, cost of the procedure were collected and analyzed. Percentages were calculated for categorical data, numerical data was represented using mean ± S.D. Chi square test was used for comparing categorical and numerical variables. Results: After randomization, 90 patients were in group OA, 90 patients were in group LA. The mean duration of surgery was 32.67 ± 5.229 in OA and 47.25± in LA, pain scores were less in LA than OA. Cost of the surgery was more in LA [mean average Rupees 21,453] over OA [mean average Rupees 12,865]. Conclusion: LA is safe and superior to OA with respect to lesser pain in postoperative period, less wound infection, earlier return of bowel sounds, short hospital stay and better cosmetic look. The cost of the procedure has big impact over patient’s socioeconomic conditions in rural parts which should be addressed by health care providers.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:36:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc4ad8a9e1d64c14ac73da6441cf1a19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2348-1447
2348-229X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:36:04Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Perspectives In Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-cc4ad8a9e1d64c14ac73da6441cf1a192023-11-24T11:52:43ZengPrathima Institute of Medical SciencesPerspectives In Medical Research2348-14472348-229X2019-04-01714548Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of TelanganaShailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2Background: Laparoscopic Appendectomy [LA] is widely practiced than Open Appendectomy [OA] for the management of acute appendicitis1. It is still unclear in rural settings which procedure is more preferable. Aims and Objectives: The current study was done to compare the safety and the advantages of both the procedures in rural settings of Telangana state. Material and methods: One hundred and eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups, OA [Open Appendectomy group] and LA [Laparoscopic Appendectomy] group. Socio demographic parameters, primary outcome measures of the patients such as post operative pain, wound infection, hospital stay, operative duration, cost of the procedure were collected and analyzed. Percentages were calculated for categorical data, numerical data was represented using mean ± S.D. Chi square test was used for comparing categorical and numerical variables. Results: After randomization, 90 patients were in group OA, 90 patients were in group LA. The mean duration of surgery was 32.67 ± 5.229 in OA and 47.25± in LA, pain scores were less in LA than OA. Cost of the surgery was more in LA [mean average Rupees 21,453] over OA [mean average Rupees 12,865]. Conclusion: LA is safe and superior to OA with respect to lesser pain in postoperative period, less wound infection, earlier return of bowel sounds, short hospital stay and better cosmetic look. The cost of the procedure has big impact over patient’s socioeconomic conditions in rural parts which should be addressed by health care providers.http://www.pimr.org.in/files-vol7-issue1-19/shailaja-vol-7-issue-1-2019.PDFopen appendectomylaparoscopic appendectomycost of surgery
spellingShingle Shailaja Adepu1 , Jayaram Adepu2
Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
Perspectives In Medical Research
open appendectomy
laparoscopic appendectomy
cost of surgery
title Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
title_full Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
title_fullStr Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
title_full_unstemmed Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
title_short Comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of Telangana
title_sort comparision of laparascopic versus open appendectomy in rural teaching hospital of telangana
topic open appendectomy
laparoscopic appendectomy
cost of surgery
url http://www.pimr.org.in/files-vol7-issue1-19/shailaja-vol-7-issue-1-2019.PDF
work_keys_str_mv AT shailajaadepu1jayaramadepu2 comparisionoflaparascopicversusopenappendectomyinruralteachinghospitaloftelangana