Contemporary substitutes of the political economy

The subject of this paper is a critique of the selective theoretical modelings of economic realities, which are monistic (quasi-neoliberal) and mathematical-statistical in nature. In this sense, the theme named Contemporary Substitutes of the Political Economy is defined. The aim of this research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mimo Draskovic, Slobodan Lakic, Veselin Draskovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch 2016-03-01
Series:Экономика региона
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2016/58/2762/pdf/
_version_ 1797727809631682560
author Mimo Draskovic
Slobodan Lakic
Veselin Draskovic
author_facet Mimo Draskovic
Slobodan Lakic
Veselin Draskovic
author_sort Mimo Draskovic
collection DOAJ
description The subject of this paper is a critique of the selective theoretical modelings of economic realities, which are monistic (quasi-neoliberal) and mathematical-statistical in nature. In this sense, the theme named Contemporary Substitutes of the Political Economy is defined. The aim of this research is that the above-mentioned modeling of economic reality would be described as a deliberate motion from the analysis and explanation of fundamental economic problems towards secondary issues. Therefore, we characterize them as unfair and programmed ways of fogging the essence of economic problems and crisis. We start from the hypothesis that these modelings replaced and virtually eliminated the former synthesized and useful political-economic analysis. In this paper, we have used a descriptive, comparative methods, panel sample and a schematic logic modeling. The results of our research show that the substitution of political economy by neoclassical and neoliberal economics is performed over a longer period, and through prioritizing the mathematical and statistical econometric analysis. As a proof, we present our selective research panel using a sample of 39 issues from five international journals, which can be found in databases SSCI and Scopus. This research is limited by the unavailability of most journals on the Internet and in printed publications. The application area of the research results is an economic theory. In conclusion, we ascertain the need for greater affirmation of political economy, which in combination with new institutional theory, enables a more realistic view of social and economic reality.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:04:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc596ba5c49e4fa9b05e0e7476e74099
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6414
2411-1406
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:04:46Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch
record_format Article
series Экономика региона
spelling doaj.art-cc596ba5c49e4fa9b05e0e7476e740992023-09-02T04:14:25ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural BranchЭкономика региона2072-64142411-14062016-03-01121374510.17059/2016-1-3Contemporary substitutes of the political economyMimo Draskovic0Slobodan Lakic1Veselin Draskovic2 University of MontenegroUniversity of MontenegroUniversity of Montenegro The subject of this paper is a critique of the selective theoretical modelings of economic realities, which are monistic (quasi-neoliberal) and mathematical-statistical in nature. In this sense, the theme named Contemporary Substitutes of the Political Economy is defined. The aim of this research is that the above-mentioned modeling of economic reality would be described as a deliberate motion from the analysis and explanation of fundamental economic problems towards secondary issues. Therefore, we characterize them as unfair and programmed ways of fogging the essence of economic problems and crisis. We start from the hypothesis that these modelings replaced and virtually eliminated the former synthesized and useful political-economic analysis. In this paper, we have used a descriptive, comparative methods, panel sample and a schematic logic modeling. The results of our research show that the substitution of political economy by neoclassical and neoliberal economics is performed over a longer period, and through prioritizing the mathematical and statistical econometric analysis. As a proof, we present our selective research panel using a sample of 39 issues from five international journals, which can be found in databases SSCI and Scopus. This research is limited by the unavailability of most journals on the Internet and in printed publications. The application area of the research results is an economic theory. In conclusion, we ascertain the need for greater affirmation of political economy, which in combination with new institutional theory, enables a more realistic view of social and economic reality.http://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2016/58/2762/pdf/political economyneoliberalismquasi-neoliberalismmodeling of economic realityinstitutional pluralism
spellingShingle Mimo Draskovic
Slobodan Lakic
Veselin Draskovic
Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
Экономика региона
political economy
neoliberalism
quasi-neoliberalism
modeling of economic reality
institutional pluralism
title Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
title_full Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
title_fullStr Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
title_short Contemporary substitutes of the political economy
title_sort contemporary substitutes of the political economy
topic political economy
neoliberalism
quasi-neoliberalism
modeling of economic reality
institutional pluralism
url http://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2016/58/2762/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT mimodraskovic contemporarysubstitutesofthepoliticaleconomy
AT slobodanlakic contemporarysubstitutesofthepoliticaleconomy
AT veselindraskovic contemporarysubstitutesofthepoliticaleconomy