The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale

Objective: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonca Oğuz, Gülçin Şenel, Nesteren Koçak, Şerife Karaca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.apjon.org/article.asp?issn=2347-5625;year=2021;volume=8;issue=4;spage=413;epage=418;aulast=Oğuz
_version_ 1797763520116293632
author Gonca Oğuz
Gülçin Şenel
Nesteren Koçak
Şerife Karaca
author_facet Gonca Oğuz
Gülçin Şenel
Nesteren Koçak
Şerife Karaca
author_sort Gonca Oğuz
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients receiving palliative care. Methods: The translation of PPSv2 into Turkish was implemented using a forward–back forward procedure. The patients were allocated from inpatient palliative care unit, consultations from oncology services, palliative care polyclinic, and consultations from emergency unit. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study with 51 patients. The cross-sectional study consisted of 280 patients. The relationship between PPS-TR, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was also measured. Construct validity was assessed by observing the test capacity across patient groups based on the place of care. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) at Time 1 and Time 2 were 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.972–0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI: 0.986–0.995). ICCs of intra-rater agreements were at least 0.956 (95% CI: 0.909–0.977) for three raters. KPS, Katz ADL, and PPS-TR scores of outpatients were significantly higher than those of inpatients and emergency. There was a perfect correlation between PPS-TR and KPS, while the correlation of PPS-TR with Katz ADL was almost perfect. Conclusions: The PPS-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of performance status of cancer patients receiving palliative care.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:43:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc6289e2b5ff459196ae06ee230b281f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2347-5625
2349-6673
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:43:37Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
spelling doaj.art-cc6289e2b5ff459196ae06ee230b281f2023-08-02T03:42:21ZengElsevierAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing2347-56252349-66732021-01-018441341810.4103/apjon.apjon-2111The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance ScaleGonca OğuzGülçin ŞenelNesteren KoçakŞerife KaracaObjective: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients receiving palliative care. Methods: The translation of PPSv2 into Turkish was implemented using a forward–back forward procedure. The patients were allocated from inpatient palliative care unit, consultations from oncology services, palliative care polyclinic, and consultations from emergency unit. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study with 51 patients. The cross-sectional study consisted of 280 patients. The relationship between PPS-TR, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was also measured. Construct validity was assessed by observing the test capacity across patient groups based on the place of care. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) at Time 1 and Time 2 were 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.972–0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI: 0.986–0.995). ICCs of intra-rater agreements were at least 0.956 (95% CI: 0.909–0.977) for three raters. KPS, Katz ADL, and PPS-TR scores of outpatients were significantly higher than those of inpatients and emergency. There was a perfect correlation between PPS-TR and KPS, while the correlation of PPS-TR with Katz ADL was almost perfect. Conclusions: The PPS-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of performance status of cancer patients receiving palliative care.http://www.apjon.org/article.asp?issn=2347-5625;year=2021;volume=8;issue=4;spage=413;epage=418;aulast=Oğuzcancerpalliative carepalliative performance scalereliabilityturkishvalidity
spellingShingle Gonca Oğuz
Gülçin Şenel
Nesteren Koçak
Şerife Karaca
The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
cancer
palliative care
palliative performance scale
reliability
turkish
validity
title The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_full The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_fullStr The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_full_unstemmed The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_short The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_sort turkish validity and reliability study of palliative performance scale
topic cancer
palliative care
palliative performance scale
reliability
turkish
validity
url http://www.apjon.org/article.asp?issn=2347-5625;year=2021;volume=8;issue=4;spage=413;epage=418;aulast=Oğuz
work_keys_str_mv AT goncaoguz theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT gulcinsenel theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT nesterenkocak theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT serifekaraca theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT goncaoguz turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT gulcinsenel turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT nesterenkocak turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT serifekaraca turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale