Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation

Abstract While tissue engineering holds significant potential to address current limitations in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck, few constructs have made their way into routine clinical use. In this review, we aim to appraise the state of head and neck tissue engineering over the past fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weston L. Niermeyer, Cole Rodman, Michael M. Li, Tendy Chiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.416
_version_ 1818334994123194368
author Weston L. Niermeyer
Cole Rodman
Michael M. Li
Tendy Chiang
author_facet Weston L. Niermeyer
Cole Rodman
Michael M. Li
Tendy Chiang
author_sort Weston L. Niermeyer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract While tissue engineering holds significant potential to address current limitations in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck, few constructs have made their way into routine clinical use. In this review, we aim to appraise the state of head and neck tissue engineering over the past five years, with a specific focus on otologic, nasal, craniofacial bone, and laryngotracheal applications. A comprehensive scoping search of the PubMed database was performed and over 2000 article hits were returned with 290 articles included in the final review. These publications have addressed the hallmark characteristics of tissue engineering (cellular source, scaffold, and growth signaling) for head and neck anatomical sites. While there have been promising reports of effective tissue engineered interventions in small groups of human patients, the majority of research remains constrained to in vitro and in vivo studies aimed at furthering the understanding of the biological processes involved in tissue engineering. Further, differences in functional and cosmetic properties of the ear, nose, airway, and craniofacial bone affect the emphasis of investigation at each site. While otolaryngologists currently play a role in tissue engineering translational research, continued multidisciplinary efforts will likely be required to push the state of translation towards tissue‐engineered constructs available for routine clinical use. Level of Evidence NA.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:16:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc778a53942044fa855e3757c9eb0c9f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2378-8038
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:16:22Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-cc778a53942044fa855e3757c9eb0c9f2022-12-21T23:42:18ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382020-08-015463064810.1002/lio2.416Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translationWeston L. Niermeyer0Cole Rodman1Michael M. Li2Tendy Chiang3Department of Otolaryngology Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USAThe Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USADepartment of Otolaryngology Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USAAbstract While tissue engineering holds significant potential to address current limitations in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck, few constructs have made their way into routine clinical use. In this review, we aim to appraise the state of head and neck tissue engineering over the past five years, with a specific focus on otologic, nasal, craniofacial bone, and laryngotracheal applications. A comprehensive scoping search of the PubMed database was performed and over 2000 article hits were returned with 290 articles included in the final review. These publications have addressed the hallmark characteristics of tissue engineering (cellular source, scaffold, and growth signaling) for head and neck anatomical sites. While there have been promising reports of effective tissue engineered interventions in small groups of human patients, the majority of research remains constrained to in vitro and in vivo studies aimed at furthering the understanding of the biological processes involved in tissue engineering. Further, differences in functional and cosmetic properties of the ear, nose, airway, and craniofacial bone affect the emphasis of investigation at each site. While otolaryngologists currently play a role in tissue engineering translational research, continued multidisciplinary efforts will likely be required to push the state of translation towards tissue‐engineered constructs available for routine clinical use. Level of Evidence NA.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.416auricularcraniofacialnasalregenerative medicinetissue engineeringtracheal
spellingShingle Weston L. Niermeyer
Cole Rodman
Michael M. Li
Tendy Chiang
Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
auricular
craniofacial
nasal
regenerative medicine
tissue engineering
tracheal
title Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
title_full Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
title_fullStr Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
title_full_unstemmed Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
title_short Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology—The state of translation
title_sort tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology the state of translation
topic auricular
craniofacial
nasal
regenerative medicine
tissue engineering
tracheal
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.416
work_keys_str_mv AT westonlniermeyer tissueengineeringapplicationsinotolaryngologythestateoftranslation
AT colerodman tissueengineeringapplicationsinotolaryngologythestateoftranslation
AT michaelmli tissueengineeringapplicationsinotolaryngologythestateoftranslation
AT tendychiang tissueengineeringapplicationsinotolaryngologythestateoftranslation