Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance

IntroductionPlantar cutaneous augmentation is a promising approach in balance rehabilitation by enhancing motion-dependent sensory feedback. The effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance has been mainly investigated in its passive form (e.g., textured insole) or on lower-limb amputees. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. S. Raghav Hari Krishna, Jeonghee Kim, Shuo-Hsiu Chang, Yoonsuck Choe, Hangue Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1249783/full
_version_ 1827315502825865216
author V. S. Raghav Hari Krishna
Jeonghee Kim
Shuo-Hsiu Chang
Yoonsuck Choe
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
author_facet V. S. Raghav Hari Krishna
Jeonghee Kim
Shuo-Hsiu Chang
Yoonsuck Choe
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
author_sort V. S. Raghav Hari Krishna
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionPlantar cutaneous augmentation is a promising approach in balance rehabilitation by enhancing motion-dependent sensory feedback. The effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance has been mainly investigated in its passive form (e.g., textured insole) or on lower-limb amputees. In this study, we tested the effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance in its active form (i.e., electrical stimulation) for individuals with intact limbs.MethodsTen healthy subjects participated in the study and were instructed to maintain their balance as long as possible on the balance board, with or without electrotactile feedback evoked on the medial side of the heel, synched with the lateral board sway. Electrotactile feedback was given in two different modes: 1) Discrete-mode E-stim as the stimulation on/off by a predefined threshold of lateral board sway and 2) Proportional-mode E-stim as the stimulation frequency proportional to the amount of lateral board sway. All subjects were distracted from the balancing task by the n-back counting task, to test subjects’ balancing capability with minimal cognitive involvement.ResultsProportional-mode E-stim, along with the n-back counting task, increased the balance time from 1.86 ± 0.03 s to 1.98 ± 0.04 s (p = 0.010). However, discrete-mode E-stim did not change the balance time (p = 0.669). Proportional-mode E-stim also increased the time duration per each swayed state (p = 0.035) while discrete-mode E-stim did not (p = 0.053).DiscussionThese results suggest that proportional-mode E-stim is more effective than discrete-mode E-stim on improving standing balance. It is perhaps because the proportional electrotactile feedback better mimics the natural tactile sensation of foot pressure than its discrete counterpart.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:57:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc8768c8f6344264846117c5a148aa01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:57:25Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-cc8768c8f6344264846117c5a148aa012024-03-18T04:35:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2024-03-011810.3389/fnins.2024.12497831249783Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balanceV. S. Raghav Hari Krishna0Jeonghee Kim1Shuo-Hsiu Chang2Yoonsuck Choe3Hangue Park4Hangue Park5Hangue Park6Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesIntroductionPlantar cutaneous augmentation is a promising approach in balance rehabilitation by enhancing motion-dependent sensory feedback. The effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance has been mainly investigated in its passive form (e.g., textured insole) or on lower-limb amputees. In this study, we tested the effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance in its active form (i.e., electrical stimulation) for individuals with intact limbs.MethodsTen healthy subjects participated in the study and were instructed to maintain their balance as long as possible on the balance board, with or without electrotactile feedback evoked on the medial side of the heel, synched with the lateral board sway. Electrotactile feedback was given in two different modes: 1) Discrete-mode E-stim as the stimulation on/off by a predefined threshold of lateral board sway and 2) Proportional-mode E-stim as the stimulation frequency proportional to the amount of lateral board sway. All subjects were distracted from the balancing task by the n-back counting task, to test subjects’ balancing capability with minimal cognitive involvement.ResultsProportional-mode E-stim, along with the n-back counting task, increased the balance time from 1.86 ± 0.03 s to 1.98 ± 0.04 s (p = 0.010). However, discrete-mode E-stim did not change the balance time (p = 0.669). Proportional-mode E-stim also increased the time duration per each swayed state (p = 0.035) while discrete-mode E-stim did not (p = 0.053).DiscussionThese results suggest that proportional-mode E-stim is more effective than discrete-mode E-stim on improving standing balance. It is perhaps because the proportional electrotactile feedback better mimics the natural tactile sensation of foot pressure than its discrete counterpart.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1249783/fullstanding balanceneuromodulationelectrotactile feedbackelectrical stimulationcalcaneal nerve stimulation
spellingShingle V. S. Raghav Hari Krishna
Jeonghee Kim
Shuo-Hsiu Chang
Yoonsuck Choe
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
Hangue Park
Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
Frontiers in Neuroscience
standing balance
neuromodulation
electrotactile feedback
electrical stimulation
calcaneal nerve stimulation
title Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
title_full Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
title_fullStr Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
title_full_unstemmed Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
title_short Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
title_sort proportional sway based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance
topic standing balance
neuromodulation
electrotactile feedback
electrical stimulation
calcaneal nerve stimulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1249783/full
work_keys_str_mv AT vsraghavharikrishna proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT jeongheekim proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT shuohsiuchang proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT yoonsuckchoe proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT hanguepark proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT hanguepark proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance
AT hanguepark proportionalswaybasedelectrotactilefeedbackimproveslateralstandingbalance