Differences in ICSI utilization rates among states with insurance mandates for ART coverage
Abstract Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) insurance mandates promote more selective utilization of ART clinic resources including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Our objective was to examine whether ICSI utilization differs by state insurance mandates for ART coverage and a...
Main Authors: | Pavel Zagadailov, Kyung S. Cho, David B. Seifer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00856-4 |
Similar Items
-
Do state insurance mandates alter ICSI utilization?
by: Pavel Zagadailov, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Bilateral versus unilateral orchidopexy: IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes
by: Lijuan Fan, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment
by: Benjamin J. Peipert, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Magnetic-activated cell sorting of nonapoptotic spermatozoa with a high DNA fragmentation index improves the live birth rate and decreases transfer cycles of IVF/ICSI
by: Jie Mei, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
ICSI diagnostic: a way to prevent total fertilization failure after 4 unsuccessful IUI
by: Arnaud Larbuisson, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)