Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies

Abstract Background Pharmacy-based screening and brief interventions (SBI) offer opportunities to identify opioid misuse and opioid safety risks and provide brief interventions that do not overly burden pharmacists. Currently, such interventions are being developed without patient input and in-depth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepika Rao, James H. Ford, Olayinka O. Shiyanbola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00460-y
_version_ 1797209160857681920
author Deepika Rao
James H. Ford
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola
author_facet Deepika Rao
James H. Ford
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola
author_sort Deepika Rao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pharmacy-based screening and brief interventions (SBI) offer opportunities to identify opioid misuse and opioid safety risks and provide brief interventions that do not overly burden pharmacists. Currently, such interventions are being developed without patient input and in-depth contextual data and insufficient translation into practice. The purpose of this study is to qualitatively explore and compare patient and pharmacist perceptions and needs regarding a pharmacy-based opioid misuse SBI and to identify relevant SBI features and future implementation strategies. Methods Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 8 patients and 11 pharmacists, to explore needs and barriers to participating in a pharmacy-based SBI. We recruited a purposive sample of English-speaking patients prescribed opioids for chronic or acute pain and pharmacists practicing in varied pharmacies (small independent, large-chain, specialty retail) settings. We used an inductive content analysis approach to analyze patient interview data. Then through a template analysis approach involving comparison of pharmacist and patient themes, we developed strategies for SBI implementation. Results Most patient participants were white, older, described living in suburban areas, and were long-term opioid users. We identified template themes related to individual, interpersonal, intervention, and implementation factors and inferred applications for SBI design or potential SBI implementation strategies. We found that patients needed education on opioid safety and general opioid use, regardless of opioid use behaviors. Pharmacists described needing patient-centered training, protocols, and scripts to provide SBI. A short-self-reported screening and brief interventions including counseling, naloxone, and involving prescribers were discussed by both groups. Conclusions Through this implementation-focused qualitative study, we identified patient needs such as opioid safety education delivered in a private and convenient format and pharmacist needs including training, workflow integration, protocols, and a time-efficient intervention for effective pharmacy-based SBI. Alternate formats of SBI using digital health technologies may be needed for effective implementation. Our findings can be used to develop patient-centered pharmacy-based SBI that can be implemented within actual pharmacy practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:50:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc975b83a7fd4f718957b247aea16861
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1940-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:50:17Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
spelling doaj.art-cc975b83a7fd4f718957b247aea168612024-04-14T11:24:05ZengBMCAddiction Science & Clinical Practice1940-06402024-04-0119111510.1186/s13722-024-00460-yPatient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmaciesDeepika Rao0James H. Ford1Olayinka O. Shiyanbola2School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-MadisonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-MadisonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstract Background Pharmacy-based screening and brief interventions (SBI) offer opportunities to identify opioid misuse and opioid safety risks and provide brief interventions that do not overly burden pharmacists. Currently, such interventions are being developed without patient input and in-depth contextual data and insufficient translation into practice. The purpose of this study is to qualitatively explore and compare patient and pharmacist perceptions and needs regarding a pharmacy-based opioid misuse SBI and to identify relevant SBI features and future implementation strategies. Methods Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 8 patients and 11 pharmacists, to explore needs and barriers to participating in a pharmacy-based SBI. We recruited a purposive sample of English-speaking patients prescribed opioids for chronic or acute pain and pharmacists practicing in varied pharmacies (small independent, large-chain, specialty retail) settings. We used an inductive content analysis approach to analyze patient interview data. Then through a template analysis approach involving comparison of pharmacist and patient themes, we developed strategies for SBI implementation. Results Most patient participants were white, older, described living in suburban areas, and were long-term opioid users. We identified template themes related to individual, interpersonal, intervention, and implementation factors and inferred applications for SBI design or potential SBI implementation strategies. We found that patients needed education on opioid safety and general opioid use, regardless of opioid use behaviors. Pharmacists described needing patient-centered training, protocols, and scripts to provide SBI. A short-self-reported screening and brief interventions including counseling, naloxone, and involving prescribers were discussed by both groups. Conclusions Through this implementation-focused qualitative study, we identified patient needs such as opioid safety education delivered in a private and convenient format and pharmacist needs including training, workflow integration, protocols, and a time-efficient intervention for effective pharmacy-based SBI. Alternate formats of SBI using digital health technologies may be needed for effective implementation. Our findings can be used to develop patient-centered pharmacy-based SBI that can be implemented within actual pharmacy practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00460-yPharmacyOpioidPatient-centeredScreeningBrief interventionPrevention
spellingShingle Deepika Rao
James H. Ford
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola
Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Pharmacy
Opioid
Patient-centered
Screening
Brief intervention
Prevention
title Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
title_full Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
title_fullStr Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
title_full_unstemmed Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
title_short Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
title_sort patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies
topic Pharmacy
Opioid
Patient-centered
Screening
Brief intervention
Prevention
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00460-y
work_keys_str_mv AT deepikarao patientandpharmacistperspectivesonopioidmisusescreeningandbriefinterventionsincommunitypharmacies
AT jameshford patientandpharmacistperspectivesonopioidmisusescreeningandbriefinterventionsincommunitypharmacies
AT olayinkaoshiyanbola patientandpharmacistperspectivesonopioidmisusescreeningandbriefinterventionsincommunitypharmacies