A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
The paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questio...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Mykolas Romeris University
2022-12-01
|
Series: | International Comparative Jurisprudence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417 |
_version_ | 1797976261771919360 |
---|---|
author | Henryk Malewski Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka Snieguolė Matulienė Valery Shepitko Mykhaylo Shepitko Rafał Cieśla |
author_facet | Henryk Malewski Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka Snieguolė Matulienė Valery Shepitko Mykhaylo Shepitko Rafał Cieśla |
author_sort | Henryk Malewski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questionnaire study of 758 students from three Universities in Lithuania (Mykolas Romeris University), Ukraine (Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University) and Poland (University of Wroclaw). Modern pedagogics considers students to be not only future professionals, but likewise active participants in improving the didactic process. In recent decades, criminalistics has become increasingly important. This paper is a fragment of a broader study that is aimed not only at investigating the current situation in the criminalistic didactics of these countries in the run-up to the creation of a single European criminalistic space, but it is likewise aimed at future professionals, educators and managers of educational institutions, who are to implement this idea. The paper is not only a presentation of law students’ views on expediency and necessity of studying criminalistics and other disciplines of criminalistic orientation important for their future professional activities, but it should likewise become a kind of guide to action for teachers and administration of universities, i.e. to improve substantive and organizational as well as methodological aspects of criminalistic didactics. The given technique of research of students’ views can be successfully applied when addressing the problems of teaching other disciplines. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T04:48:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cc997f5fd73d4b32b9649bffd8483ab3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2351-6674 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T04:48:10Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Mykolas Romeris University |
record_format | Article |
series | International Comparative Jurisprudence |
spelling | doaj.art-cc997f5fd73d4b32b9649bffd8483ab32022-12-27T07:30:54ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityInternational Comparative Jurisprudence2351-66742022-12-018210.13165/j.icj.2022.12.006 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW Henryk MalewskiEgidijus Vidmantas KurapkaSnieguolė MatulienėValery ShepitkoMykhaylo ShepitkoRafał CieślaThe paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questionnaire study of 758 students from three Universities in Lithuania (Mykolas Romeris University), Ukraine (Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University) and Poland (University of Wroclaw). Modern pedagogics considers students to be not only future professionals, but likewise active participants in improving the didactic process. In recent decades, criminalistics has become increasingly important. This paper is a fragment of a broader study that is aimed not only at investigating the current situation in the criminalistic didactics of these countries in the run-up to the creation of a single European criminalistic space, but it is likewise aimed at future professionals, educators and managers of educational institutions, who are to implement this idea. The paper is not only a presentation of law students’ views on expediency and necessity of studying criminalistics and other disciplines of criminalistic orientation important for their future professional activities, but it should likewise become a kind of guide to action for teachers and administration of universities, i.e. to improve substantive and organizational as well as methodological aspects of criminalistic didactics. The given technique of research of students’ views can be successfully applied when addressing the problems of teaching other disciplines.https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417criminalisticslegal sciencescriminalistic didacticsstudents’ views |
spellingShingle | Henryk Malewski Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka Snieguolė Matulienė Valery Shepitko Mykhaylo Shepitko Rafał Cieśla A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW International Comparative Jurisprudence criminalistics legal sciences criminalistic didactics students’ views |
title | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW |
title_full | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW |
title_fullStr | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW |
title_full_unstemmed | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW |
title_short | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW |
title_sort | comparative analysis of informed consent legislation in ukrainian and latvian legislation and case law |
topic | criminalistics legal sciences criminalistic didactics students’ views |
url | https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henrykmalewski acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT egidijusvidmantaskurapka acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT snieguolematuliene acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT valeryshepitko acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT mykhayloshepitko acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT rafałciesla acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT henrykmalewski comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT egidijusvidmantaskurapka comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT snieguolematuliene comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT valeryshepitko comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT mykhayloshepitko comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw AT rafałciesla comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw |