A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW

The paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henryk Malewski, Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka, Snieguolė Matulienė, Valery Shepitko, Mykhaylo Shepitko, Rafał Cieśla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mykolas Romeris University 2022-12-01
Series:International Comparative Jurisprudence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417
_version_ 1797976261771919360
author Henryk Malewski
Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka
Snieguolė Matulienė
Valery Shepitko
Mykhaylo Shepitko
Rafał Cieśla
author_facet Henryk Malewski
Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka
Snieguolė Matulienė
Valery Shepitko
Mykhaylo Shepitko
Rafał Cieśla
author_sort Henryk Malewski
collection DOAJ
description The paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questionnaire study of 758 students from three Universities in Lithuania (Mykolas Romeris University), Ukraine (Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University) and Poland (University of Wroclaw). Modern pedagogics considers students to be not only future professionals, but likewise active participants in improving the didactic process. In recent decades, criminalistics has become increasingly important. This paper is a fragment of a broader study that is aimed not only at investigating the current situation in the criminalistic didactics of these countries in the run-up to the creation of a single European criminalistic space, but it is likewise aimed at future professionals, educators and managers of educational institutions, who are to implement this idea. The paper is not only a presentation of law students’ views on expediency and necessity of studying criminalistics and other disciplines of criminalistic orientation important for their future professional activities, but it should likewise become a kind of guide to action for teachers and administration of universities, i.e. to improve substantive and organizational as well as methodological aspects of criminalistic didactics. The given technique of research of students’ views can be successfully applied when addressing the problems of teaching other disciplines.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:48:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cc997f5fd73d4b32b9649bffd8483ab3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-6674
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:48:10Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Mykolas Romeris University
record_format Article
series International Comparative Jurisprudence
spelling doaj.art-cc997f5fd73d4b32b9649bffd8483ab32022-12-27T07:30:54ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityInternational Comparative Jurisprudence2351-66742022-12-018210.13165/j.icj.2022.12.006 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW Henryk MalewskiEgidijus Vidmantas KurapkaSnieguolė MatulienėValery ShepitkoMykhaylo ShepitkoRafał CieślaThe paper is dedicated to the comparative research of the views of the students representing the universities of three countries in terms of usefulness (necessity) of studying the criminalistic disciplines for future legal professionals. The core of this research is a coordinated and unified questionnaire study of 758 students from three Universities in Lithuania (Mykolas Romeris University), Ukraine (Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University) and Poland (University of Wroclaw). Modern pedagogics considers students to be not only future professionals, but likewise active participants in improving the didactic process. In recent decades, criminalistics has become increasingly important. This paper is a fragment of a broader study that is aimed not only at investigating the current situation in the criminalistic didactics of these countries in the run-up to the creation of a single European criminalistic space, but it is likewise aimed at future professionals, educators and managers of educational institutions, who are to implement this idea. The paper is not only a presentation of law students’ views on expediency and necessity of studying criminalistics and other disciplines of criminalistic orientation important for their future professional activities, but it should likewise become a kind of guide to action for teachers and administration of universities, i.e. to improve substantive and organizational as well as methodological aspects of criminalistic didactics. The given technique of research of students’ views can be successfully applied when addressing the problems of teaching other disciplines.https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417criminalisticslegal sciencescriminalistic didacticsstudents’ views
spellingShingle Henryk Malewski
Egidijus Vidmantas Kurapka
Snieguolė Matulienė
Valery Shepitko
Mykhaylo Shepitko
Rafał Cieśla
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
International Comparative Jurisprudence
criminalistics
legal sciences
criminalistic didactics
students’ views
title A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
title_full A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
title_fullStr A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
title_short A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT LEGISLATION IN UKRAINIAN AND LATVIAN LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW
title_sort comparative analysis of informed consent legislation in ukrainian and latvian legislation and case law
topic criminalistics
legal sciences
criminalistic didactics
students’ views
url https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/international-comparative-jurisprudence/article/view/7417
work_keys_str_mv AT henrykmalewski acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT egidijusvidmantaskurapka acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT snieguolematuliene acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT valeryshepitko acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT mykhayloshepitko acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT rafałciesla acomparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT henrykmalewski comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT egidijusvidmantaskurapka comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT snieguolematuliene comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT valeryshepitko comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT mykhayloshepitko comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw
AT rafałciesla comparativeanalysisofinformedconsentlegislationinukrainianandlatvianlegislationandcaselaw