Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened

Abstract Background The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starlin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Gavelli, Alexandra Beurton, Jean-Louis Teboul, Nello De Vita, Danila Azzolina, Rui Shi, Arthur Pavot, Xavier Monnet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-08-01
Series:Annals of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7
_version_ 1830515498581753856
author Francesco Gavelli
Alexandra Beurton
Jean-Louis Teboul
Nello De Vita
Danila Azzolina
Rui Shi
Arthur Pavot
Xavier Monnet
author_facet Francesco Gavelli
Alexandra Beurton
Jean-Louis Teboul
Nello De Vita
Danila Azzolina
Rui Shi
Arthur Pavot
Xavier Monnet
author_sort Francesco Gavelli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO. Methods In 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CIpulse, PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CIStarling-24.4 from the commercial version and CIStarling-8.1 derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CIpulse ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CIpulse was calculated. Results Twenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CIStarling-24.4 was significantly lower compared to ∆CIStarling-8.1 (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CIStarling-8.1 and ∆CIpulse (r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIpulse. During PLR, both ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 reliably detected preload responsiveness. Conclusions Shortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI. Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T03:23:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cca8828719ee4dc8b1f12d17fb62ad12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2110-5820
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T03:23:41Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Annals of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-cca8828719ee4dc8b1f12d17fb62ad122022-12-21T18:40:39ZengSpringerOpenAnnals of Intensive Care2110-58202021-08-0111111010.1186/s13613-021-00920-7Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortenedFrancesco Gavelli0Alexandra Beurton1Jean-Louis Teboul2Nello De Vita3Danila Azzolina4Rui Shi5Arthur Pavot6Xavier Monnet7Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASResearch Support Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte OrientaleService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMASAbstract Background The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO. Methods In 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CIpulse, PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CIStarling-24.4 from the commercial version and CIStarling-8.1 derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CIpulse ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CIpulse was calculated. Results Twenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CIStarling-24.4 was significantly lower compared to ∆CIStarling-8.1 (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CIStarling-8.1 and ∆CIpulse (r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIpulse. During PLR, both ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 reliably detected preload responsiveness. Conclusions Shortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI. Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7FluidCardiac indexMonitoringPassive leg raisingFluid challengeHeart lung interactions
spellingShingle Francesco Gavelli
Alexandra Beurton
Jean-Louis Teboul
Nello De Vita
Danila Azzolina
Rui Shi
Arthur Pavot
Xavier Monnet
Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
Annals of Intensive Care
Fluid
Cardiac index
Monitoring
Passive leg raising
Fluid challenge
Heart lung interactions
title Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_full Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_fullStr Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_full_unstemmed Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_short Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_sort bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
topic Fluid
Cardiac index
Monitoring
Passive leg raising
Fluid challenge
Heart lung interactions
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7
work_keys_str_mv AT francescogavelli bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT alexandrabeurton bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT jeanlouisteboul bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT nellodevita bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT danilaazzolina bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT ruishi bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT arthurpavot bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT xaviermonnet bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened