Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults

Resilience to stress has gained increasing interest by researchers from the field of mental health and illness and some recent studies have investigated resilience from a network perspective. General self-efficacy constitutes an important resilience factor. High levels of self-efficacy have shown to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katja Schueler, Jessica Fritz, Lena Dorfschmidt, Anne-Laura van Harmelen, Eike Stroemer, Michèle Wessa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.736147/full
_version_ 1828960233141043200
author Katja Schueler
Katja Schueler
Jessica Fritz
Lena Dorfschmidt
Anne-Laura van Harmelen
Eike Stroemer
Michèle Wessa
Michèle Wessa
author_facet Katja Schueler
Katja Schueler
Jessica Fritz
Lena Dorfschmidt
Anne-Laura van Harmelen
Eike Stroemer
Michèle Wessa
Michèle Wessa
author_sort Katja Schueler
collection DOAJ
description Resilience to stress has gained increasing interest by researchers from the field of mental health and illness and some recent studies have investigated resilience from a network perspective. General self-efficacy constitutes an important resilience factor. High levels of self-efficacy have shown to promote resilience by serving as a stress buffer. However, little is known about the role of network connectivity of self-efficacy in the context of stress resilience. The present study aims at filling this gap by using psychological network analysis to study self-efficacy and resilience. Based on individual resilient functioning scores, we divided a sample of 875 mentally healthy adults into a high and low resilient functioning group. To compute these scores, we applied a novel approach based on Partial Least Squares Regression on self-reported stress and mental health measures. Separately for both groups, we then estimated regularized partial correlation networks of a ten-item self-efficacy questionnaire. We compared three different global connectivity measures–strength, expected influence, and shortest path length–as well as absolute levels of self-efficacy between the groups. Our results supported our hypothesis that stronger network connectivity of self-efficacy would be present in the highly resilient functioning group compared to the low resilient functioning group. In addition, the former showed higher absolute levels of general self-efficacy. Future research could consider using partial least squares regression to quantify resilient functioning to stress and to study the association between network connectivity and resilient functioning in other resilience factors.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:23:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccac508888b045348335d8e043ddcc55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:23:29Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-ccac508888b045348335d8e043ddcc552022-12-21T23:08:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402021-11-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.736147736147Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy AdultsKatja Schueler0Katja Schueler1Jessica Fritz2Lena Dorfschmidt3Anne-Laura van Harmelen4Eike Stroemer5Michèle Wessa6Michèle Wessa7Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyMedical Informatics Group, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomInstitute of Education and Child Studies, University of Leiden, Leiden, NetherlandsLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research Mainz, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research Mainz, Mainz, GermanyResilience to stress has gained increasing interest by researchers from the field of mental health and illness and some recent studies have investigated resilience from a network perspective. General self-efficacy constitutes an important resilience factor. High levels of self-efficacy have shown to promote resilience by serving as a stress buffer. However, little is known about the role of network connectivity of self-efficacy in the context of stress resilience. The present study aims at filling this gap by using psychological network analysis to study self-efficacy and resilience. Based on individual resilient functioning scores, we divided a sample of 875 mentally healthy adults into a high and low resilient functioning group. To compute these scores, we applied a novel approach based on Partial Least Squares Regression on self-reported stress and mental health measures. Separately for both groups, we then estimated regularized partial correlation networks of a ten-item self-efficacy questionnaire. We compared three different global connectivity measures–strength, expected influence, and shortest path length–as well as absolute levels of self-efficacy between the groups. Our results supported our hypothesis that stronger network connectivity of self-efficacy would be present in the highly resilient functioning group compared to the low resilient functioning group. In addition, the former showed higher absolute levels of general self-efficacy. Future research could consider using partial least squares regression to quantify resilient functioning to stress and to study the association between network connectivity and resilient functioning in other resilience factors.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.736147/fullresiliencenetwork analysisself-efficacyconnectivitypartial least squares regression
spellingShingle Katja Schueler
Katja Schueler
Jessica Fritz
Lena Dorfschmidt
Anne-Laura van Harmelen
Eike Stroemer
Michèle Wessa
Michèle Wessa
Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
Frontiers in Psychiatry
resilience
network analysis
self-efficacy
connectivity
partial least squares regression
title Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
title_full Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
title_fullStr Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
title_short Psychological Network Analysis of General Self-Efficacy in High vs. Low Resilient Functioning Healthy Adults
title_sort psychological network analysis of general self efficacy in high vs low resilient functioning healthy adults
topic resilience
network analysis
self-efficacy
connectivity
partial least squares regression
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.736147/full
work_keys_str_mv AT katjaschueler psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT katjaschueler psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT jessicafritz psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT lenadorfschmidt psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT annelauravanharmelen psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT eikestroemer psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT michelewessa psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults
AT michelewessa psychologicalnetworkanalysisofgeneralselfefficacyinhighvslowresilientfunctioninghealthyadults