Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards

Ranaviral infections have been associated with mass mortality events in captive and wild amphibian, fish, and reptile populations globally. In Australia, two distinct types of ranaviruses have been isolated: epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus in fish and a Frog virus 3-like ranavirus in amphibi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Alicia Maclaine, Wytamma T. Wirth, Donald T. McKnight, Graham W. Burgess, Ellen Ariel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Canadian Science Publishing 2020-09-01
Schriftenreihe:FACETS
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/full/10.1139/facets-2020-0011
_version_ 1828141881177931776
author Alicia Maclaine
Wytamma T. Wirth
Donald T. McKnight
Graham W. Burgess
Ellen Ariel
author_facet Alicia Maclaine
Wytamma T. Wirth
Donald T. McKnight
Graham W. Burgess
Ellen Ariel
author_sort Alicia Maclaine
collection DOAJ
description Ranaviral infections have been associated with mass mortality events in captive and wild amphibian, fish, and reptile populations globally. In Australia, two distinct types of ranaviruses have been isolated: epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus in fish and a Frog virus 3-like ranavirus in amphibians. Experimental studies and serum surveys have demonstrated that several Australian native fish, amphibian, and reptile species are susceptible to infection and supported the theory that ranavirus is naturally circulating in Australian herpetofauna. However, ranaviral infections have not been detected in captive or wild lizards in Australia. Oral-cloacal swabs were collected from 42 wild lizards from northern Queensland and 83 captive lizards from private collections held across three states/territories. Samples were tested for ranaviral DNA using a quantitative PCR assay. This assay detected ranaviral DNA in 30/83 (36.1%) captive and 33/42 (78.6%) wild lizard samples. This is the first time molecular evidence of ranavirus has been reported in Australian lizards.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:32:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccacb5f8bdf44b37a91c57a4fea6b6c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-1671
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:32:14Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
record_format Article
series FACETS
spelling doaj.art-ccacb5f8bdf44b37a91c57a4fea6b6c02022-12-22T04:06:58ZengCanadian Science PublishingFACETS2371-16712020-09-015175876810.1139/facets-2020-0011Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizardsAlicia Maclaine0Wytamma T. Wirth1Donald T. McKnight2Graham W. Burgess3Ellen Ariel4College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaRanaviral infections have been associated with mass mortality events in captive and wild amphibian, fish, and reptile populations globally. In Australia, two distinct types of ranaviruses have been isolated: epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus in fish and a Frog virus 3-like ranavirus in amphibians. Experimental studies and serum surveys have demonstrated that several Australian native fish, amphibian, and reptile species are susceptible to infection and supported the theory that ranavirus is naturally circulating in Australian herpetofauna. However, ranaviral infections have not been detected in captive or wild lizards in Australia. Oral-cloacal swabs were collected from 42 wild lizards from northern Queensland and 83 captive lizards from private collections held across three states/territories. Samples were tested for ranaviral DNA using a quantitative PCR assay. This assay detected ranaviral DNA in 30/83 (36.1%) captive and 33/42 (78.6%) wild lizard samples. This is the first time molecular evidence of ranavirus has been reported in Australian lizards.https://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/full/10.1139/facets-2020-0011ranavirusaustraliareptileslizardsintellagama lesueurii lesueuriipogona vitticeps
spellingShingle Alicia Maclaine
Wytamma T. Wirth
Donald T. McKnight
Graham W. Burgess
Ellen Ariel
Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
FACETS
ranavirus
australia
reptiles
lizards
intellagama lesueurii lesueurii
pogona vitticeps
title Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
title_full Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
title_fullStr Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
title_full_unstemmed Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
title_short Ranaviruses in captive and wild Australian lizards
title_sort ranaviruses in captive and wild australian lizards
topic ranavirus
australia
reptiles
lizards
intellagama lesueurii lesueurii
pogona vitticeps
url https://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/full/10.1139/facets-2020-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT aliciamaclaine ranavirusesincaptiveandwildaustralianlizards
AT wytammatwirth ranavirusesincaptiveandwildaustralianlizards
AT donaldtmcknight ranavirusesincaptiveandwildaustralianlizards
AT grahamwburgess ranavirusesincaptiveandwildaustralianlizards
AT ellenariel ranavirusesincaptiveandwildaustralianlizards