Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy

BACKGROUND: Radioiodine ablation is an adjuvant procedure used to treat patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. For ablation to be successful, patients must have elevated levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). This can be achieved by withholding thyroid hormone therapy (endogenous stimula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gianluca De Danieli, Fabio Monari, Renzo Lazzarini, Filippo Cipriani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SEEd Medical Publishers 2016-10-01
Series:Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/1264
_version_ 1818286635405541376
author Gianluca De Danieli
Fabio Monari
Renzo Lazzarini
Filippo Cipriani
author_facet Gianluca De Danieli
Fabio Monari
Renzo Lazzarini
Filippo Cipriani
author_sort Gianluca De Danieli
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Radioiodine ablation is an adjuvant procedure used to treat patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. For ablation to be successful, patients must have elevated levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). This can be achieved by withholding thyroid hormone therapy (endogenous stimulation), or by administration of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH; Thyrogen®; exogenous stimulation) to patients in the euthyroid state. AIM: To compare the estimated health benefits, cost and cost-effectiveness of TSH stimulation with and without Thyrogen® in the Italian setting. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of exogenous vs. endogenous TSH stimulation before radioiodine remnant ablation of patients with newly diagnosed, well-differentiated papillary or follicular thyroid cancer who have undergone total or near-total thyroidectomy. A Markov model was developed to simulate treatment costs and health outcomes associated with exogenous and endogenous stimulation in four distinct health states: pre-ablation, ablation, post-ablation, and well/recovery. Treatment was stratified by patients who receive high- and low-activity (30-100 mCi, respectively) in the ablation state. The Italian National Health System perspective was adopted in the base case scenario while the impact of indirect costs was explored in a sensitivity analysis. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) specific to each health state were estimated, summarized and converted into a corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: We calculated a cost-effectiveness ratio of 18,357.18 €/QALY gained whereas the inclusion of indirect cost and accident cost produced reductions of the ICER to € 14,609.51 and € 15,515.26 per QALY, respectively. Finally, all results in the sensitivity analysis are below the lower bound of national and international cost- effective threshold. CONCLUSION: Thyrogen® represents a cost-effective option for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent total or near-total thyroidectomy in Italy. Our findings are consistent with other cost-utility analyses.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:27:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccb4191942b84f6cb01afd4daac29742
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2240-256X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:27:44Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher SEEd Medical Publishers
record_format Article
series Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
spelling doaj.art-ccb4191942b84f6cb01afd4daac297422022-12-22T00:04:05ZengSEEd Medical PublishersFarmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways2240-256X2016-10-0117310.7175/fe.v17i3.12641188Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in ItalyGianluca De Danieli0Fabio Monari1Renzo Lazzarini2Filippo Cipriani3Sanofi Genzyme, Modena, ItalyPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, ItalyCentro di Riferimento Oncologico, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico di Aviano (PN), ItalySanofi Genzyme, Modena, ItalyBACKGROUND: Radioiodine ablation is an adjuvant procedure used to treat patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. For ablation to be successful, patients must have elevated levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). This can be achieved by withholding thyroid hormone therapy (endogenous stimulation), or by administration of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH; Thyrogen®; exogenous stimulation) to patients in the euthyroid state. AIM: To compare the estimated health benefits, cost and cost-effectiveness of TSH stimulation with and without Thyrogen® in the Italian setting. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of exogenous vs. endogenous TSH stimulation before radioiodine remnant ablation of patients with newly diagnosed, well-differentiated papillary or follicular thyroid cancer who have undergone total or near-total thyroidectomy. A Markov model was developed to simulate treatment costs and health outcomes associated with exogenous and endogenous stimulation in four distinct health states: pre-ablation, ablation, post-ablation, and well/recovery. Treatment was stratified by patients who receive high- and low-activity (30-100 mCi, respectively) in the ablation state. The Italian National Health System perspective was adopted in the base case scenario while the impact of indirect costs was explored in a sensitivity analysis. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) specific to each health state were estimated, summarized and converted into a corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: We calculated a cost-effectiveness ratio of 18,357.18 €/QALY gained whereas the inclusion of indirect cost and accident cost produced reductions of the ICER to € 14,609.51 and € 15,515.26 per QALY, respectively. Finally, all results in the sensitivity analysis are below the lower bound of national and international cost- effective threshold. CONCLUSION: Thyrogen® represents a cost-effective option for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent total or near-total thyroidectomy in Italy. Our findings are consistent with other cost-utility analyses.https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/1264radioiodine ablationrecombinant human thyroid stimulating hormonethyroidectomy
spellingShingle Gianluca De Danieli
Fabio Monari
Renzo Lazzarini
Filippo Cipriani
Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
radioiodine ablation
recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone
thyroidectomy
title Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
title_full Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
title_short Cost-effectiveness profile, organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous TSH therapy (Thyrogen®) vs. THW in thyroid residue ablation in Italy
title_sort cost effectiveness profile organizational implications and patient preferences on the use of exogenous tsh therapy thyrogen r vs thw in thyroid residue ablation in italy
topic radioiodine ablation
recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone
thyroidectomy
url https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/1264
work_keys_str_mv AT gianlucadedanieli costeffectivenessprofileorganizationalimplicationsandpatientpreferencesontheuseofexogenoustshtherapythyrogenvsthwinthyroidresidueablationinitaly
AT fabiomonari costeffectivenessprofileorganizationalimplicationsandpatientpreferencesontheuseofexogenoustshtherapythyrogenvsthwinthyroidresidueablationinitaly
AT renzolazzarini costeffectivenessprofileorganizationalimplicationsandpatientpreferencesontheuseofexogenoustshtherapythyrogenvsthwinthyroidresidueablationinitaly
AT filippocipriani costeffectivenessprofileorganizationalimplicationsandpatientpreferencesontheuseofexogenoustshtherapythyrogenvsthwinthyroidresidueablationinitaly