Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?

Abstract Background Biodynamic agriculture is a management approach that aims to reduce the reliance on agrochemicals for production by emphasizing the use of specific natural preparations. A 2-year field trial spanning 2019–2020 was conducted in an established vineyard (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Cesan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefano Pettinelli, Laura Buzzi, Brunella Ceccantoni, Rosario Muleo, Alessandro Bianchi, Elena Brunori, Fabio Mencarelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-10-01
Series:Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00492-7
_version_ 1797577621118124032
author Stefano Pettinelli
Laura Buzzi
Brunella Ceccantoni
Rosario Muleo
Alessandro Bianchi
Elena Brunori
Fabio Mencarelli
author_facet Stefano Pettinelli
Laura Buzzi
Brunella Ceccantoni
Rosario Muleo
Alessandro Bianchi
Elena Brunori
Fabio Mencarelli
author_sort Stefano Pettinelli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Biodynamic agriculture is a management approach that aims to reduce the reliance on agrochemicals for production by emphasizing the use of specific natural preparations. A 2-year field trial spanning 2019–2020 was conducted in an established vineyard (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Cesanese d’Affile) to elucidate the impact of the cow horn silica biodynamic preparation (BD-501) on leaf vine physiology, potential resistance via chitinase activity, and analysis of secondary metabolites. The vineyard under biodynamic management was divided into two plots: one treated with BD-501 (BD-501) and the other untreated (BD). Throughout the vine growth season, measurements of carotenoid and chlorophyll levels, polyphenols, and chitinase activity were taken around key phenological phases (BBCH scale). During the ripening phase, a fluorometer was employed to assess chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves. Results Leaves treated with BD-501 exhibited elevated concentrations of polyphenols and increased chitinase activity during the later phenological phases. In contrast, the untreated BD samples demonstrated high values primarily in the central phase of the observation period but not consistently throughout. At the time of harvest, chlorophyll concentration and quantum yield exhibited no statistically significant differences. BD-501 triggered a distinct response in terms of potential defense mechanisms (elevated polyphenols and chitinase activity) during the veraison phase. However, conversely, lower levels of chlorophylls and carotenoids were observed. Conclusions Nevertheless, a further round of experimental work is required to thoroughly comprehend the regulatory mechanisms behind this adaptive response and to ascertain the efficacy of BD-501. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:11:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccbcc2f9a30f483bb908e465b26b578a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-5641
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:11:45Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-ccbcc2f9a30f483bb908e465b26b578a2023-11-19T12:36:14ZengSpringerOpenChemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture2196-56412023-10-0110111010.1186/s40538-023-00492-7Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?Stefano Pettinelli0Laura Buzzi1Brunella Ceccantoni2Rosario Muleo3Alessandro Bianchi4Elena Brunori5Fabio Mencarelli6Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), University of PisaDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of TusciaDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of TusciaDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of TusciaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), University of PisaDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of TusciaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), University of PisaAbstract Background Biodynamic agriculture is a management approach that aims to reduce the reliance on agrochemicals for production by emphasizing the use of specific natural preparations. A 2-year field trial spanning 2019–2020 was conducted in an established vineyard (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Cesanese d’Affile) to elucidate the impact of the cow horn silica biodynamic preparation (BD-501) on leaf vine physiology, potential resistance via chitinase activity, and analysis of secondary metabolites. The vineyard under biodynamic management was divided into two plots: one treated with BD-501 (BD-501) and the other untreated (BD). Throughout the vine growth season, measurements of carotenoid and chlorophyll levels, polyphenols, and chitinase activity were taken around key phenological phases (BBCH scale). During the ripening phase, a fluorometer was employed to assess chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves. Results Leaves treated with BD-501 exhibited elevated concentrations of polyphenols and increased chitinase activity during the later phenological phases. In contrast, the untreated BD samples demonstrated high values primarily in the central phase of the observation period but not consistently throughout. At the time of harvest, chlorophyll concentration and quantum yield exhibited no statistically significant differences. BD-501 triggered a distinct response in terms of potential defense mechanisms (elevated polyphenols and chitinase activity) during the veraison phase. However, conversely, lower levels of chlorophylls and carotenoids were observed. Conclusions Nevertheless, a further round of experimental work is required to thoroughly comprehend the regulatory mechanisms behind this adaptive response and to ascertain the efficacy of BD-501. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00492-7Biodynamic viticultureHorn silicaChitinaseChlorophyllsEnzymatic activity
spellingShingle Stefano Pettinelli
Laura Buzzi
Brunella Ceccantoni
Rosario Muleo
Alessandro Bianchi
Elena Brunori
Fabio Mencarelli
Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Biodynamic viticulture
Horn silica
Chitinase
Chlorophylls
Enzymatic activity
title Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
title_full Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
title_fullStr Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
title_full_unstemmed Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
title_short Is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv. Cesanese d’Affile?
title_sort is there any influence of biodynamic preparation 501 on the physiological activity of grape leaves cv cesanese d affile
topic Biodynamic viticulture
Horn silica
Chitinase
Chlorophylls
Enzymatic activity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00492-7
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanopettinelli isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT laurabuzzi isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT brunellaceccantoni isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT rosariomuleo isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT alessandrobianchi isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT elenabrunori isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile
AT fabiomencarelli isthereanyinfluenceofbiodynamicpreparation501onthephysiologicalactivityofgrapeleavescvcesanesedaffile