The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Clinicoeconomic studies require that the health utility index be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Choice of an adequate method for determining health utility for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) makes it necessary to compare various approaches to this assessment. Objectiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dmitriy Vladimirovich Goryachev, Sh F Erdes, Dmitry Vladimirovich Goryachev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: IMA PRESS LLC 2010-12-01
Series:Научно-практическая ревматология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rsp.mediar-press.net/rsp/article/view/962
_version_ 1797862877428711424
author Dmitriy Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
Dmitry Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
author_facet Dmitriy Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
Dmitry Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
author_sort Dmitriy Vladimirovich Goryachev
collection DOAJ
description Clinicoeconomic studies require that the health utility index be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Choice of an adequate method for determining health utility for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) makes it necessary to compare various approaches to this assessment. Objective. To compare health utility values obtained with a time to trade-off (TTO) method and those with the EQ-5D questionnaire. Subjects and methods. A single interview was made in 45 patients with RA (mean RA duration 11.7±6.6 years) with a mean HAQ of 1.22±0.52. Utility was assessed using the direct TTO method, EQ-5D index, and visual analogue scale of general health (VAS-GH); functional disease activity index was assessed according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Results. Five (11.2%) patients with RA could not answer a question to calculate TTO. The mean TTO, EQ-5D, and VAS-GH "thermometer" indices were 0.55±0.36, 0.30±0.32, and 0.47±0.23, respectively. Conversion from EQ-5D to utility index yielded the values similar to those with a mean TTO of 0.54±0.29. The values of the utility index calculated by TTO failed to correlate with those of HAQ and EQ-5D. The disease duration was unrelated to the values of the utility index calculated by any of the methods used. The association of TTO index was found only for VAS-GH "thermometer". Conclusion. EQ-5D index and VAS-GH are the methods of choice in determining health utility for a clinicoeconomic analysis in patients with RA.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:26:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccc4c346ad8a409889234843930c094d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1995-4484
1995-4492
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:26:37Z
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher IMA PRESS LLC
record_format Article
series Научно-практическая ревматология
spelling doaj.art-ccc4c346ad8a409889234843930c094d2023-03-22T13:45:46ZrusIMA PRESS LLCНаучно-практическая ревматология1995-44841995-44922010-12-01486868910.14412/1995-4484-2010-829902The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritisDmitriy Vladimirovich GoryachevSh F ErdesDmitry Vladimirovich GoryachevSh F ErdesClinicoeconomic studies require that the health utility index be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Choice of an adequate method for determining health utility for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) makes it necessary to compare various approaches to this assessment. Objective. To compare health utility values obtained with a time to trade-off (TTO) method and those with the EQ-5D questionnaire. Subjects and methods. A single interview was made in 45 patients with RA (mean RA duration 11.7±6.6 years) with a mean HAQ of 1.22±0.52. Utility was assessed using the direct TTO method, EQ-5D index, and visual analogue scale of general health (VAS-GH); functional disease activity index was assessed according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Results. Five (11.2%) patients with RA could not answer a question to calculate TTO. The mean TTO, EQ-5D, and VAS-GH "thermometer" indices were 0.55±0.36, 0.30±0.32, and 0.47±0.23, respectively. Conversion from EQ-5D to utility index yielded the values similar to those with a mean TTO of 0.54±0.29. The values of the utility index calculated by TTO failed to correlate with those of HAQ and EQ-5D. The disease duration was unrelated to the values of the utility index calculated by any of the methods used. The association of TTO index was found only for VAS-GH "thermometer". Conclusion. EQ-5D index and VAS-GH are the methods of choice in determining health utility for a clinicoeconomic analysis in patients with RA.https://rsp.mediar-press.net/rsp/article/view/962eq-5drheumatoid arthritisutility indexeq-5dtime to trade-off method (tto)
spellingShingle Dmitriy Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
Dmitry Vladimirovich Goryachev
Sh F Erdes
The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Научно-практическая ревматология
eq-5d
rheumatoid arthritis
utility index
eq-5d
time to trade-off method (tto)
title The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort time to trade off method versus the eq 5d index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic eq-5d
rheumatoid arthritis
utility index
eq-5d
time to trade-off method (tto)
url https://rsp.mediar-press.net/rsp/article/view/962
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitriyvladimirovichgoryachev thetimetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT shferdes thetimetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT dmitryvladimirovichgoryachev thetimetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT shferdes thetimetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT dmitriyvladimirovichgoryachev timetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT shferdes timetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT dmitryvladimirovichgoryachev timetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT shferdes timetotradeoffmethodversustheeq5dindextodeterminehealthutilityinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis