A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition
The appropriate selection of rootstock-scion combinations to improve yield and fully realize grafting benefits requires an in-depth understanding of rootstock-scion synergy. Toward this end, we grafted two determinate-type scions [grape tomato (‘BHN 1022') and beefsteak tomato (‘Skyway')]...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.948656/full |
_version_ | 1828091110283542528 |
---|---|
author | Tian Gong Jeffrey K. Brecht Karen E. Koch Samuel F. Hutton Xin Zhao |
author_facet | Tian Gong Jeffrey K. Brecht Karen E. Koch Samuel F. Hutton Xin Zhao |
author_sort | Tian Gong |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The appropriate selection of rootstock-scion combinations to improve yield and fully realize grafting benefits requires an in-depth understanding of rootstock-scion synergy. Toward this end, we grafted two determinate-type scions [grape tomato (‘BHN 1022') and beefsteak tomato (‘Skyway')] onto four rootstocks with different characteristics to examine plant growth, yield performance, biomass production, and fruit mineral nutrient composition. The study was conducted during two growing seasons (spring and fall plantings in Florida) under organic production in high tunnels with the non-grafted scions as controls. Rootstocks had previously been designated as either “generative” (‘Estamino') or “vegetative” (‘DR0141TX') by some commercial suppliers or had not been characterized [‘RST-04-106-T' and ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)']. Also, ‘Estamino', ‘DR0141TX', and ‘RST-04-106-T' had been described as more vigorous than ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)'. In both planting seasons (with low levels of soilborne disease pressure), the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks increased marketable and total fruit yields for both scions except for the beefsteak tomato grafted with the “vegetative” rootstock in fall planting. Positive effects of ‘RST-04-106-T' on fruit yield varied with scions and planting seasons, and were most manifested when grafted with the beefsteak tomato scion in fall planting. ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)' led to similar yields as the non-grafted controls except for grafting with the grape tomato scion in fall planting. For vegetative and fruit biomass, both the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks had positive impacts except for the beefsteak tomato in fall planting. For fruit mineral composition, the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks, both highly vigorous, consistently elevated fruit P, K, Ca, Zn, and Fe contents on a dry weight basis, whereas the other rootstocks did not. Overall, although the more vigorous rootstocks enhanced tomato plant productivity and fruit minerals, the evidence presented here does not support the suggestion that the so-called “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks have different impacts on tomato scion yield, biomass production, or fruit mineral contents. More studies with different production systems and environmental conditions as well as contrasting scion genotypes are needed to further categorize the impacts of rootstocks with different vigor and other characteristics on plant biomass production and their implications on fruit yield development. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T06:06:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ccd69cccd61b45b58aa1c0cb4fd12b3f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-462X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T06:06:51Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Plant Science |
spelling | doaj.art-ccd69cccd61b45b58aa1c0cb4fd12b3f2022-12-22T04:41:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2022-12-011310.3389/fpls.2022.948656948656A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral compositionTian Gong0Jeffrey K. Brecht1Karen E. Koch2Samuel F. Hutton3Xin Zhao4Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesGulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL, United StatesHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesThe appropriate selection of rootstock-scion combinations to improve yield and fully realize grafting benefits requires an in-depth understanding of rootstock-scion synergy. Toward this end, we grafted two determinate-type scions [grape tomato (‘BHN 1022') and beefsteak tomato (‘Skyway')] onto four rootstocks with different characteristics to examine plant growth, yield performance, biomass production, and fruit mineral nutrient composition. The study was conducted during two growing seasons (spring and fall plantings in Florida) under organic production in high tunnels with the non-grafted scions as controls. Rootstocks had previously been designated as either “generative” (‘Estamino') or “vegetative” (‘DR0141TX') by some commercial suppliers or had not been characterized [‘RST-04-106-T' and ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)']. Also, ‘Estamino', ‘DR0141TX', and ‘RST-04-106-T' had been described as more vigorous than ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)'. In both planting seasons (with low levels of soilborne disease pressure), the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks increased marketable and total fruit yields for both scions except for the beefsteak tomato grafted with the “vegetative” rootstock in fall planting. Positive effects of ‘RST-04-106-T' on fruit yield varied with scions and planting seasons, and were most manifested when grafted with the beefsteak tomato scion in fall planting. ‘SHIELD RZ F1 (61-802)' led to similar yields as the non-grafted controls except for grafting with the grape tomato scion in fall planting. For vegetative and fruit biomass, both the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks had positive impacts except for the beefsteak tomato in fall planting. For fruit mineral composition, the “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks, both highly vigorous, consistently elevated fruit P, K, Ca, Zn, and Fe contents on a dry weight basis, whereas the other rootstocks did not. Overall, although the more vigorous rootstocks enhanced tomato plant productivity and fruit minerals, the evidence presented here does not support the suggestion that the so-called “vegetative” and “generative” rootstocks have different impacts on tomato scion yield, biomass production, or fruit mineral contents. More studies with different production systems and environmental conditions as well as contrasting scion genotypes are needed to further categorize the impacts of rootstocks with different vigor and other characteristics on plant biomass production and their implications on fruit yield development.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.948656/fullrootstock-scion interactionrootstock-scion synergygenerative rootstockvegetative rootstockrootstock vigorbeefsteak tomato |
spellingShingle | Tian Gong Jeffrey K. Brecht Karen E. Koch Samuel F. Hutton Xin Zhao A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition Frontiers in Plant Science rootstock-scion interaction rootstock-scion synergy generative rootstock vegetative rootstock rootstock vigor beefsteak tomato |
title | A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition |
title_full | A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition |
title_fullStr | A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition |
title_short | A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition |
title_sort | systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass resource partitioning yield and fruit mineral composition |
topic | rootstock-scion interaction rootstock-scion synergy generative rootstock vegetative rootstock rootstock vigor beefsteak tomato |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.948656/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiangong asystematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT jeffreykbrecht asystematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT karenekoch asystematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT samuelfhutton asystematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT xinzhao asystematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT tiangong systematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT jeffreykbrecht systematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT karenekoch systematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT samuelfhutton systematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition AT xinzhao systematicassessmentofhowrootstockgrowthcharacteristicsimpactgraftedtomatoplantbiomassresourcepartitioningyieldandfruitmineralcomposition |