Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?

<span>This study questions the effectiveness of masking faces by means of pixelation on television or in newspapers. Previous studies have shown that masking just the face leads to unacceptably high recognition levels, making it likely that participants also use other cues for recognition, suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jelle Demanet, Kristof Dhont, Lies Notebaert, Sven Pattyn, André Vandierendonck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2007-10-01
Series:Psychologica Belgica
Online Access:http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/116
_version_ 1831773406235721728
author Jelle Demanet
Kristof Dhont
Lies Notebaert
Sven Pattyn
André Vandierendonck
author_facet Jelle Demanet
Kristof Dhont
Lies Notebaert
Sven Pattyn
André Vandierendonck
author_sort Jelle Demanet
collection DOAJ
description <span>This study questions the effectiveness of masking faces by means of pixelation on television or in newspapers. Previous studies have shown that masking just the face leads to unacceptably high recognition levels, making it likely that participants also use other cues for recognition, such as hairstyle or clothes. In the current study we investigate this possibility by means of an identification task in which participants had to identify (partially) masked images of familiar people. To demonstrate that non-facial cues become increasingly important for recognition as faces are masked more strongly, we manipulated the size of the masked area and the degree of pixelation. Confirming our expectations, increasing the size of masked area or its level of deterioration led to lower recognition rates. More importantly, also an interaction effect between the two variables emerged, showing that additional visual information partly compensates the downswing in recognition when masking becomes stronger. Although in some conditions low recognition rates were found, masking was never a hundred percent effective, making it clear that the media should approach this issue with care. Implications of our findings and future directions are considered.</span>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:35:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cce4e463cfb948d3a19f66e5cbca0ac4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0033-2879
2054-670X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:35:47Z
publishDate 2007-10-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Psychologica Belgica
spelling doaj.art-cce4e463cfb948d3a19f66e5cbca0ac42022-12-21T18:32:22ZengUbiquity PressPsychologica Belgica0033-28792054-670X2007-10-0147426127610.5334/pb-47-4-261116Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?Jelle Demanet0Kristof Dhont1Lies Notebaert2Sven Pattyn3André Vandierendonck4Ghent UniversityGhent UniversityGhent UniversityGhent UniversityGhent University<span>This study questions the effectiveness of masking faces by means of pixelation on television or in newspapers. Previous studies have shown that masking just the face leads to unacceptably high recognition levels, making it likely that participants also use other cues for recognition, such as hairstyle or clothes. In the current study we investigate this possibility by means of an identification task in which participants had to identify (partially) masked images of familiar people. To demonstrate that non-facial cues become increasingly important for recognition as faces are masked more strongly, we manipulated the size of the masked area and the degree of pixelation. Confirming our expectations, increasing the size of masked area or its level of deterioration led to lower recognition rates. More importantly, also an interaction effect between the two variables emerged, showing that additional visual information partly compensates the downswing in recognition when masking becomes stronger. Although in some conditions low recognition rates were found, masking was never a hundred percent effective, making it clear that the media should approach this issue with care. Implications of our findings and future directions are considered.</span>http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/116
spellingShingle Jelle Demanet
Kristof Dhont
Lies Notebaert
Sven Pattyn
André Vandierendonck
Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
Psychologica Belgica
title Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
title_full Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
title_fullStr Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
title_full_unstemmed Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
title_short Pixelating Familiar People in the Media: Should Masking Be Taken at Face Value?
title_sort pixelating familiar people in the media should masking be taken at face value
url http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/116
work_keys_str_mv AT jelledemanet pixelatingfamiliarpeopleinthemediashouldmaskingbetakenatfacevalue
AT kristofdhont pixelatingfamiliarpeopleinthemediashouldmaskingbetakenatfacevalue
AT liesnotebaert pixelatingfamiliarpeopleinthemediashouldmaskingbetakenatfacevalue
AT svenpattyn pixelatingfamiliarpeopleinthemediashouldmaskingbetakenatfacevalue
AT andrevandierendonck pixelatingfamiliarpeopleinthemediashouldmaskingbetakenatfacevalue