Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study

The interplay between different modalities can help to perceive stimuli more effectively. However, very few studies have focused on how multisensory distractors affect task performance. By adopting behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) techniques, the present study examined whether multisen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yichen Yuan, Xiang He, Zhenzhu Yue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnint.2023.1120668/full
_version_ 1797897258569564160
author Yichen Yuan
Xiang He
Zhenzhu Yue
author_facet Yichen Yuan
Xiang He
Zhenzhu Yue
author_sort Yichen Yuan
collection DOAJ
description The interplay between different modalities can help to perceive stimuli more effectively. However, very few studies have focused on how multisensory distractors affect task performance. By adopting behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) techniques, the present study examined whether multisensory audiovisual distractors could attract attention more effectively than unisensory distractors. Moreover, we explored whether such a process was modulated by working memory load. Across three experiments, n-back tasks (1-back and 2-back) were adopted with peripheral auditory, visual, or audiovisual distractors. Visual and auditory distractors were white discs and pure tones (Experiments 1 and 2), pictures and sounds of animals (Experiment 3), respectively. Behavioral results in Experiment 1 showed a significant interference effect under high working memory load but not under low load condition. The responses to central letters with audiovisual distractors were significantly slower than those to letters without distractors, while no significant difference was found between unisensory distractor and without distractor conditions. Similarly, ERP results in Experiments 2 and 3 showed that there existed an integration only under high load condition. That is, an early integration for simple audiovisual distractors (240–340 ms) and a late integration for complex audiovisual distractors (440–600 ms). These findings suggest that multisensory distractors can be integrated and effectively attract attention away from the main task, i.e., interference effect. Moreover, this effect is pronounced only under high working memory load condition.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:54:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccf330b164264e97bed633cd632cf2a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5145
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:54:39Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-ccf330b164264e97bed633cd632cf2a02023-02-23T05:48:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience1662-51452023-02-011710.3389/fnint.2023.11206681120668Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials studyYichen YuanXiang HeZhenzhu YueThe interplay between different modalities can help to perceive stimuli more effectively. However, very few studies have focused on how multisensory distractors affect task performance. By adopting behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) techniques, the present study examined whether multisensory audiovisual distractors could attract attention more effectively than unisensory distractors. Moreover, we explored whether such a process was modulated by working memory load. Across three experiments, n-back tasks (1-back and 2-back) were adopted with peripheral auditory, visual, or audiovisual distractors. Visual and auditory distractors were white discs and pure tones (Experiments 1 and 2), pictures and sounds of animals (Experiment 3), respectively. Behavioral results in Experiment 1 showed a significant interference effect under high working memory load but not under low load condition. The responses to central letters with audiovisual distractors were significantly slower than those to letters without distractors, while no significant difference was found between unisensory distractor and without distractor conditions. Similarly, ERP results in Experiments 2 and 3 showed that there existed an integration only under high load condition. That is, an early integration for simple audiovisual distractors (240–340 ms) and a late integration for complex audiovisual distractors (440–600 ms). These findings suggest that multisensory distractors can be integrated and effectively attract attention away from the main task, i.e., interference effect. Moreover, this effect is pronounced only under high working memory load condition.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnint.2023.1120668/fullmultisensory integrationaudiovisualdistractorworking memory loadn-back task
spellingShingle Yichen Yuan
Xiang He
Zhenzhu Yue
Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
multisensory integration
audiovisual
distractor
working memory load
n-back task
title Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
title_full Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
title_fullStr Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
title_full_unstemmed Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
title_short Working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors: A behavioral and event-related potentials study
title_sort working memory load modulates the processing of audiovisual distractors a behavioral and event related potentials study
topic multisensory integration
audiovisual
distractor
working memory load
n-back task
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnint.2023.1120668/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yichenyuan workingmemoryloadmodulatestheprocessingofaudiovisualdistractorsabehavioralandeventrelatedpotentialsstudy
AT xianghe workingmemoryloadmodulatestheprocessingofaudiovisualdistractorsabehavioralandeventrelatedpotentialsstudy
AT zhenzhuyue workingmemoryloadmodulatestheprocessingofaudiovisualdistractorsabehavioralandeventrelatedpotentialsstudy