Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

The oncologic outcomes of cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OmPCa) are still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the oncologic outcome of CRP in OmPCa. OVID-Medline, OVID-Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doo Yong Chung, Dong Hyuk Kang, Hae Do Jung, Joo Yong Lee, Do Kyung Kim, Jee Soo Ha, Jinhyung Jeon, Kang Su Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Urological Association 2023-05-01
Series:Investigative and Clinical Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230058
_version_ 1827950667627495424
author Doo Yong Chung
Dong Hyuk Kang
Hae Do Jung
Joo Yong Lee
Do Kyung Kim
Jee Soo Ha
Jinhyung Jeon
Kang Su Cho
author_facet Doo Yong Chung
Dong Hyuk Kang
Hae Do Jung
Joo Yong Lee
Do Kyung Kim
Jee Soo Ha
Jinhyung Jeon
Kang Su Cho
author_sort Doo Yong Chung
collection DOAJ
description The oncologic outcomes of cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OmPCa) are still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the oncologic outcome of CRP in OmPCa. OVID-Medline, OVID-Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible studies published before January 2023. A total of 11 studies (929 patients), 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 non-RCT studies, were included in the final analysis. RCT and non-RCT were further analyzed separately. End points were progression-free-survival (PFS), time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa), cancer-specific-survival (CSS) and overall-survival (OS). It was analyzed using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In PFS, in RCT, HR=0.43 (CIs=0.27–0.69) was shown statistically significant, but in non-RCTs, HR=0.50 (CIs=0.20–1.25), there was no statistical difference. And, in time to CRPCa was statistically significant in the CRP group in all analyses (RCT; HR=0.44; CIs=0.29–0.67) (non-RCTs; HR=0.64; CIs=0.47–0.88). Next, CSS was not statistically different between the two groups (HR=0.63; CIs=0.37–1.05). Finally, OS showed better results in the CRP group in all analyses (RCT; HR=0.44; CIs=0.26–0.76) (non-RCTs; HR=0.59; CIs=0.37–0.93). Patients who received CRP in OmPCa showed better oncologic outcomes compared to controls. Notably, time to CRPC and OS showed significantly improved compared with control. We recommend that experienced urologists who are capable of managing complications consider CRP as a strategy to achieve good oncological outcomes in OmPCa. However, since most of the included studies are non-RCT studies, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:29:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ccfa1b371eab4a7887fcb8e7ed065477
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2466-0493
2466-054X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:29:58Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Korean Urological Association
record_format Article
series Investigative and Clinical Urology
spelling doaj.art-ccfa1b371eab4a7887fcb8e7ed0654772023-05-10T04:52:22ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2023-05-0164324225410.4111/icu.20230058Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysisDoo Yong Chung0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-5742Dong Hyuk Kang 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0814-7336Hae Do Jung2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-585XJoo Yong Lee3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-1767Do Kyung Kim 4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3696-8756Jee Soo Ha5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-4619Jinhyung Jeon6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-1310Kang Su Cho 7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3500-8833Department of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.Department of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.Department of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.The oncologic outcomes of cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OmPCa) are still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the oncologic outcome of CRP in OmPCa. OVID-Medline, OVID-Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible studies published before January 2023. A total of 11 studies (929 patients), 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 non-RCT studies, were included in the final analysis. RCT and non-RCT were further analyzed separately. End points were progression-free-survival (PFS), time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa), cancer-specific-survival (CSS) and overall-survival (OS). It was analyzed using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In PFS, in RCT, HR=0.43 (CIs=0.27–0.69) was shown statistically significant, but in non-RCTs, HR=0.50 (CIs=0.20–1.25), there was no statistical difference. And, in time to CRPCa was statistically significant in the CRP group in all analyses (RCT; HR=0.44; CIs=0.29–0.67) (non-RCTs; HR=0.64; CIs=0.47–0.88). Next, CSS was not statistically different between the two groups (HR=0.63; CIs=0.37–1.05). Finally, OS showed better results in the CRP group in all analyses (RCT; HR=0.44; CIs=0.26–0.76) (non-RCTs; HR=0.59; CIs=0.37–0.93). Patients who received CRP in OmPCa showed better oncologic outcomes compared to controls. Notably, time to CRPC and OS showed significantly improved compared with control. We recommend that experienced urologists who are capable of managing complications consider CRP as a strategy to achieve good oncological outcomes in OmPCa. However, since most of the included studies are non-RCT studies, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results.https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230058cytoreduction surgical proceduresneoplasm metastasisprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsradiotherapy
spellingShingle Doo Yong Chung
Dong Hyuk Kang
Hae Do Jung
Joo Yong Lee
Do Kyung Kim
Jee Soo Ha
Jinhyung Jeon
Kang Su Cho
Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Investigative and Clinical Urology
cytoreduction surgical procedures
neoplasm metastasis
prostatectomy
prostatic neoplasms
radiotherapy
title Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort cytoreductive prostatectomy may improve oncological outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer an updated systematic review and meta analysis
topic cytoreduction surgical procedures
neoplasm metastasis
prostatectomy
prostatic neoplasms
radiotherapy
url https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230058
work_keys_str_mv AT dooyongchung cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT donghyukkang cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haedojung cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jooyonglee cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dokyungkim cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jeesooha cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinhyungjeon cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kangsucho cytoreductiveprostatectomymayimproveoncologicaloutcomesinpatientswitholigometastaticprostatecanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis