The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality

Purpose: This study investigates an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and its efficacy and complications in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, interventional study involving 30 eyes of 20 patients with DME. Patients' eyes with DME which w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shailender Kumar Chaudhary, Nabeel Firoz, Saloni Gupta, Omprakash Anand, Sahil Agrawal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Chaudhary
_version_ 1797231769108348928
author Shailender Kumar Chaudhary
Nabeel Firoz
Saloni Gupta
Omprakash Anand
Sahil Agrawal
author_facet Shailender Kumar Chaudhary
Nabeel Firoz
Saloni Gupta
Omprakash Anand
Sahil Agrawal
author_sort Shailender Kumar Chaudhary
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study investigates an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and its efficacy and complications in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, interventional study involving 30 eyes of 20 patients with DME. Patients' eyes with DME which were pseudophakic with a visual acuity of 6/12 or less and a central macular thickness (CMT) of 300 microns or more on optical coherence tomography were included. Primary efficacy variables were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CMT, and intraocular pressure (IOP), noted at baseline. The patients were followed up and parameters noted at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months following the implant into the vitreous cavity. Results: Eyes receiving the implant had a significant improvement (P < 0.001) in BCVA and gained a mean of 6.10 letters on the Snellen chart over the 3-month period. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in CMT in the eyes receiving the implant. The mean increase in IOP over the 3-month follow-up, although statistically significant, was well within the normal physiological range. Conclusion: The study concluded that intravitreal dexamethasone implant is an effective treatment for DME, and it has a statistically significant and clinically meaningful effect on BCVA and CMT.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:49:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd2312de7afe465a9076596f5efec336
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:49:38Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-cd2312de7afe465a9076596f5efec3362024-04-01T12:58:19ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsKerala Journal of Ophthalmology0976-66772023-01-0135329730010.4103/kjo.kjo_212_21The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modalityShailender Kumar ChaudharyNabeel FirozSaloni GuptaOmprakash AnandSahil AgrawalPurpose: This study investigates an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and its efficacy and complications in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, interventional study involving 30 eyes of 20 patients with DME. Patients' eyes with DME which were pseudophakic with a visual acuity of 6/12 or less and a central macular thickness (CMT) of 300 microns or more on optical coherence tomography were included. Primary efficacy variables were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CMT, and intraocular pressure (IOP), noted at baseline. The patients were followed up and parameters noted at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months following the implant into the vitreous cavity. Results: Eyes receiving the implant had a significant improvement (P < 0.001) in BCVA and gained a mean of 6.10 letters on the Snellen chart over the 3-month period. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in CMT in the eyes receiving the implant. The mean increase in IOP over the 3-month follow-up, although statistically significant, was well within the normal physiological range. Conclusion: The study concluded that intravitreal dexamethasone implant is an effective treatment for DME, and it has a statistically significant and clinically meaningful effect on BCVA and CMT.http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Chaudharydexamethasone implantdiabetic macular edemaintravitreal implantsteroid implant
spellingShingle Shailender Kumar Chaudhary
Nabeel Firoz
Saloni Gupta
Omprakash Anand
Sahil Agrawal
The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
dexamethasone implant
diabetic macular edema
intravitreal implant
steroid implant
title The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
title_full The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
title_fullStr The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
title_short The efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema – Novel use as a primary treatment modality
title_sort efficacy and complication of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema novel use as a primary treatment modality
topic dexamethasone implant
diabetic macular edema
intravitreal implant
steroid implant
url http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Chaudhary
work_keys_str_mv AT shailenderkumarchaudhary theefficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT nabeelfiroz theefficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT salonigupta theefficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT omprakashanand theefficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT sahilagrawal theefficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT shailenderkumarchaudhary efficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT nabeelfiroz efficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT salonigupta efficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT omprakashanand efficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality
AT sahilagrawal efficacyandcomplicationofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantindiabeticmacularedemanoveluseasaprimarytreatmentmodality