Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda?
In 1999, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) published an extensive account of genocide in Rwanda, Leave None to Tell the Story. Based on interviews and archival work conducted by a team of researchers and written primarily by Alison Des Forges, Leave No...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Manchester University Press
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Humanitarian Affairs |
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1828809630509170688 |
|---|---|
| author | Timothy Longman |
| author_facet | Timothy Longman |
| author_sort | Timothy Longman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In 1999, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) published an extensive account of genocide in Rwanda, Leave None to Tell the Story. Based on interviews and archival work conducted by a team of researchers and written primarily by Alison Des Forges, Leave None to Tell was quickly recognised as the definitive account of the 1994 genocide. In the ensuing two decades, however, much additional research has added to our understanding of the 1994 violence. In this paper, I assess Leave None to Tell the Story in light of the research conducted since its publication, focusing in particular on three major challenges to the analysis. First, research into the organisation of the genocide disputes the degree to which it was planned in advance. Second, micro-level research into the motivations of those who participated disputes the influence of ideology on the genocide. Third, research has provided increasing evidence and details of violence perpetrated by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). I contend that despite these correctives, much of the analysis continues to hold up, such as the role of national figures in promoting genocide at the local level, the impact of the dynamics of local power struggles on the violence, and the patterns of violence, including the effort after the initial massacres to implicate a wide portion of the population. Finally, as a member of the team that researched and helped write Leave None to Tell, I reflect on the value of this rare sort of research project that engages human rights organisations in an academic research project. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:59:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cd26ef6d44644785bc1e83b21ae85b4f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2515-6411 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:59:30Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Manchester University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Humanitarian Affairs |
| spelling | doaj.art-cd26ef6d44644785bc1e83b21ae85b4f2022-12-22T00:29:53ZengManchester University PressJournal of Humanitarian Affairs2515-64112020-12-0122404710.7227/JHA.042Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda?Timothy Longman0Boston UniversityIn 1999, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) published an extensive account of genocide in Rwanda, Leave None to Tell the Story. Based on interviews and archival work conducted by a team of researchers and written primarily by Alison Des Forges, Leave None to Tell was quickly recognised as the definitive account of the 1994 genocide. In the ensuing two decades, however, much additional research has added to our understanding of the 1994 violence. In this paper, I assess Leave None to Tell the Story in light of the research conducted since its publication, focusing in particular on three major challenges to the analysis. First, research into the organisation of the genocide disputes the degree to which it was planned in advance. Second, micro-level research into the motivations of those who participated disputes the influence of ideology on the genocide. Third, research has provided increasing evidence and details of violence perpetrated by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). I contend that despite these correctives, much of the analysis continues to hold up, such as the role of national figures in promoting genocide at the local level, the impact of the dynamics of local power struggles on the violence, and the patterns of violence, including the effort after the initial massacres to implicate a wide portion of the population. Finally, as a member of the team that researched and helped write Leave None to Tell, I reflect on the value of this rare sort of research project that engages human rights organisations in an academic research project.rwandagenocidehuman rights watchalison des forgeslocal-level research |
| spellingShingle | Timothy Longman Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? Journal of Humanitarian Affairs rwanda genocide human rights watch alison des forges local-level research |
| title | Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? |
| title_full | Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? |
| title_fullStr | Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? |
| title_short | Twenty Years after Leave None to Tell the Story, What Do We Now Know about the Genocide of the Tutsi In Rwanda? |
| title_sort | twenty years after leave none to tell the story what do we now know about the genocide of the tutsi in rwanda |
| topic | rwanda genocide human rights watch alison des forges local-level research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT timothylongman twentyyearsafterleavenonetotellthestorywhatdowenowknowaboutthegenocideofthetutsiinrwanda |