Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems
PurposeThe purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcrackscomparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc,and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.Subjects and MethodsThirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Istanbul University
2019-01-01
|
Series: | European Oral Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/43439/529665 |
_version_ | 1797918715429257216 |
---|---|
author | Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇ Ali Keleş Burak Sadık Elif Bahar Çakıcı Fatih Çakıcı |
author_facet | Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇ Ali Keleş Burak Sadık Elif Bahar Çakıcı Fatih Çakıcı |
author_sort | Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇ |
collection | DOAJ |
description | PurposeThe purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcrackscomparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc,and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.Subjects and MethodsThirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimentalgroups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system.Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of13.68 μm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newlyformed dentinal microcracks.ResultsThe Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrackformation than the ProTaper Next group (p < 0.001). There were also significantdifferences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-AdjustingFile groups (p < 0.001).ConclusionReciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formedmicrocraks compared to ProTaper Next system. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:34:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cd2fed715f584603b82ac1c8311c7f70 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2630-6158 2651-2823 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:34:54Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Istanbul University |
record_format | Article |
series | European Oral Research |
spelling | doaj.art-cd2fed715f584603b82ac1c8311c7f702023-02-15T16:11:27ZengIstanbul UniversityEuropean Oral Research2630-61582651-28232019-01-0153121244Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systemsFunda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇0Ali Keleş1Burak Sadık2Elif Bahar Çakıcı3Fatih Çakıcı4Private PracticeONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITYPrivate PracticeORDU UNIVERSITYORDU UNIVERSITYPurposeThe purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcrackscomparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc,and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.Subjects and MethodsThirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimentalgroups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system.Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of13.68 μm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newlyformed dentinal microcracks.ResultsThe Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrackformation than the ProTaper Next group (p < 0.001). There were also significantdifferences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-AdjustingFile groups (p < 0.001).ConclusionReciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formedmicrocraks compared to ProTaper Next system.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/43439/529665dentinal microcracksmicro–computed tomographyprotaper nextreciprocself-adjusting file |
spellingShingle | Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci̇ Ali Keleş Burak Sadık Elif Bahar Çakıcı Fatih Çakıcı Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems European Oral Research dentinal microcracks micro–computed tomography protaper next reciproc self-adjusting file |
title | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems |
title_full | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems |
title_short | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems |
title_sort | comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next reciproc and self adjusting file systems |
topic | dentinal microcracks micro–computed tomography protaper next reciproc self-adjusting file |
url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/43439/529665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fundafundaoglukucukekenci comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT alikeles comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT buraksadık comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT elifbaharcakıcı comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT fatihcakıcı comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems |