Simeons døde hund

Symeon of Emesa is a holy fool. When holy fools appear in public, they behave as if they were mad, but at night when they are alone with God, they act as "normal" ascetics: they pray and cry and prostate themselves. When Symeon came to Emesa, he tied a dead dog to his belt and dragged it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kasper Graarup
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift 1998-09-01
Series:Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2653
_version_ 1797360759290724352
author Kasper Graarup
author_facet Kasper Graarup
author_sort Kasper Graarup
collection DOAJ
description Symeon of Emesa is a holy fool. When holy fools appear in public, they behave as if they were mad, but at night when they are alone with God, they act as "normal" ascetics: they pray and cry and prostate themselves. When Symeon came to Emesa, he tied a dead dog to his belt and dragged it through the city gate. In my view, Symeon with his dead dog and idiotic and enigmatic behaviour is to be understood in relation to the passion of Christ. Holy foolishness is an ascetic practice, which is located and performed in the moral wilderness of the city. When anchoritic practices of asceticism take place in the physical wilderness of the desert or other remote (from civilisation) regions, the ascetic role model is Jesus in the desert. When the ascetic is a holy fool of the city, the model is Jesus in Jerusalem. When the anchoritic ascetics perform, their bodies, as well as their environment (the desert), are functioning as graphic and physical testimonies to the anchorites' virtuous souls. When the holy fools perform, their bodies are similarly a part of the fluid vanity of their environment: the city. But neither city nor body has any graphic equivalence to the holy fool's soul, which is the direct opposite of his body. The dog belonging to Simeon of Emesa is to be understood in the light of this relationship between soul and body, i.e.,  the dog is to be understood in relation to Christian virtues regarding asceticism, in particular holy foolishness. The significance of the dog does not necessarity depend on internal references to neither cynicism, as Derek Krueger would maintain, nor to Greek or Egyptian gods, as is the opinion of Ewald Kislinger. The dead dog is a symbol of Symeon's dead body.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:44:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd308be23c7f44868f8b644de70f2567
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1904-8181
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:44:17Z
publishDate 1998-09-01
publisher Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
record_format Article
series Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
spelling doaj.art-cd308be23c7f44868f8b644de70f25672024-01-09T13:39:54ZdanReligionsvidenskabeligt TidsskriftReligionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift1904-81811998-09-013310.7146/rt.v0i33.2653Simeons døde hundKasper Graarup Symeon of Emesa is a holy fool. When holy fools appear in public, they behave as if they were mad, but at night when they are alone with God, they act as "normal" ascetics: they pray and cry and prostate themselves. When Symeon came to Emesa, he tied a dead dog to his belt and dragged it through the city gate. In my view, Symeon with his dead dog and idiotic and enigmatic behaviour is to be understood in relation to the passion of Christ. Holy foolishness is an ascetic practice, which is located and performed in the moral wilderness of the city. When anchoritic practices of asceticism take place in the physical wilderness of the desert or other remote (from civilisation) regions, the ascetic role model is Jesus in the desert. When the ascetic is a holy fool of the city, the model is Jesus in Jerusalem. When the anchoritic ascetics perform, their bodies, as well as their environment (the desert), are functioning as graphic and physical testimonies to the anchorites' virtuous souls. When the holy fools perform, their bodies are similarly a part of the fluid vanity of their environment: the city. But neither city nor body has any graphic equivalence to the holy fool's soul, which is the direct opposite of his body. The dog belonging to Simeon of Emesa is to be understood in the light of this relationship between soul and body, i.e.,  the dog is to be understood in relation to Christian virtues regarding asceticism, in particular holy foolishness. The significance of the dog does not necessarity depend on internal references to neither cynicism, as Derek Krueger would maintain, nor to Greek or Egyptian gods, as is the opinion of Ewald Kislinger. The dead dog is a symbol of Symeon's dead body. https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2653Symeon af EmesaAskese
spellingShingle Kasper Graarup
Simeons døde hund
Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
Symeon af Emesa
Askese
title Simeons døde hund
title_full Simeons døde hund
title_fullStr Simeons døde hund
title_full_unstemmed Simeons døde hund
title_short Simeons døde hund
title_sort simeons dode hund
topic Symeon af Emesa
Askese
url https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2653
work_keys_str_mv AT kaspergraarup simeonsdødehund