Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma
Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma (UTUC) is still debated for its possible seeding risk and thus consequent oncological recurrences, especially for atypical ones. The aim of the study is to compare recurrence and survival after Laparoscopic vs. Open...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.769527/full |
_version_ | 1819096666142146560 |
---|---|
author | Simone Morselli Simone Morselli Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli Giorgio Verrini Arcangelo Sebastianelli Arcangelo Sebastianelli Riccardo Campi Riccardo Campi Andrea Liaci Pietro Spatafora Pietro Spatafora Paolo Barzaghi Giovanni Ferrari Mauro Gacci Mauro Gacci Sergio Serni Sergio Serni Maurizio Brausi Maurizio Brausi |
author_facet | Simone Morselli Simone Morselli Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli Giorgio Verrini Arcangelo Sebastianelli Arcangelo Sebastianelli Riccardo Campi Riccardo Campi Andrea Liaci Pietro Spatafora Pietro Spatafora Paolo Barzaghi Giovanni Ferrari Mauro Gacci Mauro Gacci Sergio Serni Sergio Serni Maurizio Brausi Maurizio Brausi |
author_sort | Simone Morselli |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma (UTUC) is still debated for its possible seeding risk and thus consequent oncological recurrences, especially for atypical ones. The aim of the study is to compare recurrence and survival after Laparoscopic vs. Open Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC).Method: A retrospective evaluation of UTUC consecutive surgeries from 2008 to 2019 was conducted, including pT ≥ 2, High Grade UTUC who underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision without concomitant lymphadenectomy in three urological tertiary centers. Statistical analyses compared recurrence and cancer specific survival, based on surgical approach, while logistic multivariate analyses and Kaplan Meyer survival curve analyzed possible risk factors for recurrence and survival.Results: One hundred seven cases of RNU, 47 (43.9%) laparoscopic and 60 (56.1%) open, were included in this report. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. However, tumor stage was higher in the Open arm [T3–T4 in 44 (73.3%) vs. 20 (43.4%) in Laparoscopic]. Mean follow-up was 91.6 months in laparoscopy RNU vs. 93.5 months in open RNU. Recurrence rate (RR) was comparable between groups (p = 0.594), and so was the site, although 3 (6.3%) peritoneal recurrences were found only in laparoscopic group (p = 0.057). At multivariate logistic regression, tumor stage and surgical approach were independent predictors of recurrence (p < 0.05), while only tumor stage was predictor of cancer specific death (p = 0.029).Conclusion: Surgical approach has no impact on recurrence site, overall survival, and RR. Still, according to our data peritoneal carcinomatosis was present only in laparoscopic arm, despite how it didn't reach statistical significance. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T00:02:49Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cd33e88b29ba4b50bdc8fe2f4eb67bac |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-875X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T00:02:49Z |
publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-cd33e88b29ba4b50bdc8fe2f4eb67bac2022-12-21T18:45:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-12-01810.3389/fsurg.2021.769527769527Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell CarcinomaSimone Morselli0Simone Morselli1Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli2Giorgio Verrini3Arcangelo Sebastianelli4Arcangelo Sebastianelli5Riccardo Campi6Riccardo Campi7Andrea Liaci8Pietro Spatafora9Pietro Spatafora10Paolo Barzaghi11Giovanni Ferrari12Mauro Gacci13Mauro Gacci14Sergio Serni15Sergio Serni16Maurizio Brausi17Maurizio Brausi18Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Urology, Cure Hesperia Hospital, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Urology, AUSL Modena, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Urology, Cure Hesperia Hospital, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyUnit of Urological Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Urology, Cure Hesperia Hospital, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Urology, AUSL Modena, Modena, ItalyIntroduction: Laparoscopic surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma (UTUC) is still debated for its possible seeding risk and thus consequent oncological recurrences, especially for atypical ones. The aim of the study is to compare recurrence and survival after Laparoscopic vs. Open Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC).Method: A retrospective evaluation of UTUC consecutive surgeries from 2008 to 2019 was conducted, including pT ≥ 2, High Grade UTUC who underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision without concomitant lymphadenectomy in three urological tertiary centers. Statistical analyses compared recurrence and cancer specific survival, based on surgical approach, while logistic multivariate analyses and Kaplan Meyer survival curve analyzed possible risk factors for recurrence and survival.Results: One hundred seven cases of RNU, 47 (43.9%) laparoscopic and 60 (56.1%) open, were included in this report. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. However, tumor stage was higher in the Open arm [T3–T4 in 44 (73.3%) vs. 20 (43.4%) in Laparoscopic]. Mean follow-up was 91.6 months in laparoscopy RNU vs. 93.5 months in open RNU. Recurrence rate (RR) was comparable between groups (p = 0.594), and so was the site, although 3 (6.3%) peritoneal recurrences were found only in laparoscopic group (p = 0.057). At multivariate logistic regression, tumor stage and surgical approach were independent predictors of recurrence (p < 0.05), while only tumor stage was predictor of cancer specific death (p = 0.029).Conclusion: Surgical approach has no impact on recurrence site, overall survival, and RR. Still, according to our data peritoneal carcinomatosis was present only in laparoscopic arm, despite how it didn't reach statistical significance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.769527/fullUTUCnephroureretectomyrecurrence rate (RR)seedinglaparoscopy |
spellingShingle | Simone Morselli Simone Morselli Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli Giorgio Verrini Arcangelo Sebastianelli Arcangelo Sebastianelli Riccardo Campi Riccardo Campi Andrea Liaci Pietro Spatafora Pietro Spatafora Paolo Barzaghi Giovanni Ferrari Mauro Gacci Mauro Gacci Sergio Serni Sergio Serni Maurizio Brausi Maurizio Brausi Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma Frontiers in Surgery UTUC nephroureretectomy recurrence rate (RR) seeding laparoscopy |
title | Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | Comparison of Tumor Seeding and Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic vs. Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparison of tumor seeding and recurrence rate after laparoscopic vs open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma |
topic | UTUC nephroureretectomy recurrence rate (RR) seeding laparoscopy |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.769527/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonemorselli comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT simonemorselli comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT ferdinandodanielevitelli comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT giorgioverrini comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT arcangelosebastianelli comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT arcangelosebastianelli comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT riccardocampi comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT riccardocampi comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT andrealiaci comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT pietrospatafora comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT pietrospatafora comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT paolobarzaghi comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT giovanniferrari comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT maurogacci comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT maurogacci comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT sergioserni comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT sergioserni comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT mauriziobrausi comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma AT mauriziobrausi comparisonoftumorseedingandrecurrencerateafterlaparoscopicvsopennephroureterectomyforupperurinarytracttransitionalcellcarcinoma |