Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols

The time evolution and the asymptotic outcome of a Landau–Zener–Stueckelberg–Majorana (LZ) process under continuous weak non-selective measurement is analyzed. We compare two measurement protocols in which the populations of either the adiabatic or the non-adiabatic levels are (continuously and weak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Novelli, Wolfgang Belzig, Abraham Nitzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:New Journal of Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013001
_version_ 1797751261851811840
author Anna Novelli
Wolfgang Belzig
Abraham Nitzan
author_facet Anna Novelli
Wolfgang Belzig
Abraham Nitzan
author_sort Anna Novelli
collection DOAJ
description The time evolution and the asymptotic outcome of a Landau–Zener–Stueckelberg–Majorana (LZ) process under continuous weak non-selective measurement is analyzed. We compare two measurement protocols in which the populations of either the adiabatic or the non-adiabatic levels are (continuously and weakly) monitored. The weak measurement formalism, described using a Gaussian Kraus operator, leads to a time evolution characterized by a Markovian dephasing process, which, in the non-adiabatic measurement protocol is similar to earlier studies of LZ dynamics in a dephasing environment. Casting the problem in the language of measurement theory makes it possible for us to compare diabatic and adiabatic measurement scenarios, to consider engineered dephasing as a control device and to examine the manifestation of the Zeno effect under the different measurement protocols. In particular, under measurement of the non-adiabatic populations, the Zeno effect is manifested not as a freezing of the measured system in its initial state, but rather as an approach to equal asymptotic populations of the two diabatic states. This behavior can be traced to the way by which the weak measurement formalism behaves in the strong measurement limit, with a built-in relationship between measurement time and strength.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:45:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd41580a768147e088b14e3fbaa131dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1367-2630
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:45:55Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series New Journal of Physics
spelling doaj.art-cd41580a768147e088b14e3fbaa131dc2023-08-08T14:15:27ZengIOP PublishingNew Journal of Physics1367-26302015-01-0117101300110.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013001Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocolsAnna Novelli0Wolfgang Belzig1Abraham Nitzan2Department of Physics, University of Konstanz , D-78457 Konstanz, Germany; School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelDepartment of Physics, University of Konstanz , D-78457 Konstanz, GermanySchool of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978, IsraelThe time evolution and the asymptotic outcome of a Landau–Zener–Stueckelberg–Majorana (LZ) process under continuous weak non-selective measurement is analyzed. We compare two measurement protocols in which the populations of either the adiabatic or the non-adiabatic levels are (continuously and weakly) monitored. The weak measurement formalism, described using a Gaussian Kraus operator, leads to a time evolution characterized by a Markovian dephasing process, which, in the non-adiabatic measurement protocol is similar to earlier studies of LZ dynamics in a dephasing environment. Casting the problem in the language of measurement theory makes it possible for us to compare diabatic and adiabatic measurement scenarios, to consider engineered dephasing as a control device and to examine the manifestation of the Zeno effect under the different measurement protocols. In particular, under measurement of the non-adiabatic populations, the Zeno effect is manifested not as a freezing of the measured system in its initial state, but rather as an approach to equal asymptotic populations of the two diabatic states. This behavior can be traced to the way by which the weak measurement formalism behaves in the strong measurement limit, with a built-in relationship between measurement time and strength.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013001quantum measurementZeno effectLandau–Zener problem
spellingShingle Anna Novelli
Wolfgang Belzig
Abraham Nitzan
Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
New Journal of Physics
quantum measurement
Zeno effect
Landau–Zener problem
title Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
title_full Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
title_fullStr Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
title_full_unstemmed Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
title_short Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
title_sort landau zener evolution under weak measurement manifestation of the zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
topic quantum measurement
Zeno effect
Landau–Zener problem
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013001
work_keys_str_mv AT annanovelli landauzenerevolutionunderweakmeasurementmanifestationofthezenoeffectunderdiabaticandadiabaticmeasurementprotocols
AT wolfgangbelzig landauzenerevolutionunderweakmeasurementmanifestationofthezenoeffectunderdiabaticandadiabaticmeasurementprotocols
AT abrahamnitzan landauzenerevolutionunderweakmeasurementmanifestationofthezenoeffectunderdiabaticandadiabaticmeasurementprotocols