How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony

The philosophies of Wolff and Baumgarten have been traditionally evaluated as mere systematizations of the doctrines of Leibniz, and, therefore, as lacking all originality. The paper revises that opinion, focusing on the specific problem of the interaction of natural substances, in order to show tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaston Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2014-04-01
Series:Ideas y Valores
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/30227/44519
_version_ 1818339962492289024
author Gaston Robert
author_facet Gaston Robert
author_sort Gaston Robert
collection DOAJ
description The philosophies of Wolff and Baumgarten have been traditionally evaluated as mere systematizations of the doctrines of Leibniz, and, therefore, as lacking all originality. The paper revises that opinion, focusing on the specific problem of the interaction of natural substances, in order to show that they do not follow Leibniz as closely with respect to some of the central principles of pre-established harmony. It also questions the use of “Leibnizianism” as a label to refer to a homogeneous and undifferentiated body of doctrines.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:35:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd453090acff4f77825ebc8d5101ecb4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0120-0062
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:35:20Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
record_format Article
series Ideas y Valores
spelling doaj.art-cd453090acff4f77825ebc8d5101ecb42022-12-21T23:40:03ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIdeas y Valores0120-00622014-04-0163154107135How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished HarmonyGaston Robert0King’s College London – InglaterraThe philosophies of Wolff and Baumgarten have been traditionally evaluated as mere systematizations of the doctrines of Leibniz, and, therefore, as lacking all originality. The paper revises that opinion, focusing on the specific problem of the interaction of natural substances, in order to show that they do not follow Leibniz as closely with respect to some of the central principles of pre-established harmony. It also questions the use of “Leibnizianism” as a label to refer to a homogeneous and undifferentiated body of doctrines.http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/30227/44519A. G. BaumgartenG. W. LeibnizCh. Wolffpreestablished harmony.
spellingShingle Gaston Robert
How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
Ideas y Valores
A. G. Baumgarten
G. W. Leibniz
Ch. Wolff
preestablished harmony.
title How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
title_full How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
title_fullStr How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
title_full_unstemmed How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
title_short How Leibnizian Were the “Leibnizians” Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the Theory of Preestablished Harmony
title_sort how leibnizian were the leibnizians ch wolff and a g baumgarten reflections on the theory of preestablished harmony
topic A. G. Baumgarten
G. W. Leibniz
Ch. Wolff
preestablished harmony.
url http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/30227/44519
work_keys_str_mv AT gastonrobert howleibnizianweretheleibnizianschwolffandagbaumgartenreflectionsonthetheoryofpreestablishedharmony