Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation
Abstract Background To date, there is no information on the safety and efficacy of the novel anti-sarbecoviruses monoclonal antibody sotrovimab administered, as a post-exposure prophylactic measure, during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods We describe the out...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Infectious Agents and Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00454-y |
_version_ | 1811315126917136384 |
---|---|
author | Gianpaolo Marcacci Nicola Coppola Emanuela Madonna Cristina Becchimanzi Stefania De Pascalis Silvia D’Ovidio Stefania Crisci Piera Maiolino Rosaria De Filippi Antonio Pinto |
author_facet | Gianpaolo Marcacci Nicola Coppola Emanuela Madonna Cristina Becchimanzi Stefania De Pascalis Silvia D’Ovidio Stefania Crisci Piera Maiolino Rosaria De Filippi Antonio Pinto |
author_sort | Gianpaolo Marcacci |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background To date, there is no information on the safety and efficacy of the novel anti-sarbecoviruses monoclonal antibody sotrovimab administered, as a post-exposure prophylactic measure, during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods We describe the outcomes of a Multiple Myeloma (MM) patient, who was threateningly exposed to the Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant, two days after having received a myeloablative regimen of high-dose melphalan. The patient fulfilled all CDC criteria for prolonged close contacts with an index patient who tested positive for a molecular nasopharyngeal swab (Omicron; B.1.1.529) soon after admission to the ward. Given the high risks of morbidity and mortality in the case of COVID-19 developing during the aplastic phase of transplantation, we adopted a post-exposure prophylaxis intervention based on intravenous (i.v.) sotrovimab. Results Sotrovimab (500 mg i.v.) was administered at day + 2 from stem cells reinfusion, i.e. 4 days after myeloablative chemotherapy, and at day + 5 from the last close contact with the Omicron-positive index case. The patient was fully protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout his clinical course and remained molecularly negative at the day + 30 from the transplant. We compared times to engraftment and transplant-related toxicities of the sotrovimab-treated patient with the last 15 MM patients transplanted at our Centre, evidencing no unexpected safety signals, infusion-related reactions, or alarming effects on engraftment kinetics. Conclusions We have shown here for the first time that administration of sotrovimab during the pre-engraftment phase of ASCT is effective, safe, and not associated with delays in hemopoietic recovery. As compared to MM patients who received the same myeloablative conditioning regimen, the patient given sotrovimab during the aplastic phase did not show any significant differences in engraftment kinetics and toxicity outcomes. Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab may represent a valuable approach in the stem cell transplantation setting for patients with high-risk exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case sustained by highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 variants escaping the vaccine-derived immunity due to antigenic shifts in the spike proteins. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T11:25:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cd5de9fa28e448ed9273f321154ab676 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1750-9378 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T11:25:52Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Infectious Agents and Cancer |
spelling | doaj.art-cd5de9fa28e448ed9273f321154ab6762022-12-22T02:48:43ZengBMCInfectious Agents and Cancer1750-93782022-08-011711710.1186/s13027-022-00454-yPost-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantationGianpaolo Marcacci0Nicola Coppola1Emanuela Madonna2Cristina Becchimanzi3Stefania De Pascalis4Silvia D’Ovidio5Stefania Crisci6Piera Maiolino7Rosaria De Filippi8Antonio Pinto9Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSDepartment of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliHematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSHematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSDepartment of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliHematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSHematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSPharmacy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi Federico IIHematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’, IRCCSAbstract Background To date, there is no information on the safety and efficacy of the novel anti-sarbecoviruses monoclonal antibody sotrovimab administered, as a post-exposure prophylactic measure, during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods We describe the outcomes of a Multiple Myeloma (MM) patient, who was threateningly exposed to the Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant, two days after having received a myeloablative regimen of high-dose melphalan. The patient fulfilled all CDC criteria for prolonged close contacts with an index patient who tested positive for a molecular nasopharyngeal swab (Omicron; B.1.1.529) soon after admission to the ward. Given the high risks of morbidity and mortality in the case of COVID-19 developing during the aplastic phase of transplantation, we adopted a post-exposure prophylaxis intervention based on intravenous (i.v.) sotrovimab. Results Sotrovimab (500 mg i.v.) was administered at day + 2 from stem cells reinfusion, i.e. 4 days after myeloablative chemotherapy, and at day + 5 from the last close contact with the Omicron-positive index case. The patient was fully protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout his clinical course and remained molecularly negative at the day + 30 from the transplant. We compared times to engraftment and transplant-related toxicities of the sotrovimab-treated patient with the last 15 MM patients transplanted at our Centre, evidencing no unexpected safety signals, infusion-related reactions, or alarming effects on engraftment kinetics. Conclusions We have shown here for the first time that administration of sotrovimab during the pre-engraftment phase of ASCT is effective, safe, and not associated with delays in hemopoietic recovery. As compared to MM patients who received the same myeloablative conditioning regimen, the patient given sotrovimab during the aplastic phase did not show any significant differences in engraftment kinetics and toxicity outcomes. Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab may represent a valuable approach in the stem cell transplantation setting for patients with high-risk exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case sustained by highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 variants escaping the vaccine-derived immunity due to antigenic shifts in the spike proteins.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00454-yMultiple myelomaAutologous stem cell transplantationSARS-CoV-2 Omicron variantSotrovimab |
spellingShingle | Gianpaolo Marcacci Nicola Coppola Emanuela Madonna Cristina Becchimanzi Stefania De Pascalis Silvia D’Ovidio Stefania Crisci Piera Maiolino Rosaria De Filippi Antonio Pinto Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation Infectious Agents and Cancer Multiple myeloma Autologous stem cell transplantation SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant Sotrovimab |
title | Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
title_full | Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
title_fullStr | Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
title_short | Post-exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
title_sort | post exposure prophylaxis with sotrovimab for omicron b 1 1 529 sars cov 2 variant during the aplastic phase of autologous stem cell transplantation |
topic | Multiple myeloma Autologous stem cell transplantation SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant Sotrovimab |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00454-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gianpaolomarcacci postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT nicolacoppola postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT emanuelamadonna postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT cristinabecchimanzi postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT stefaniadepascalis postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT silviadovidio postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT stefaniacrisci postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT pieramaiolino postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT rosariadefilippi postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation AT antoniopinto postexposureprophylaxiswithsotrovimabforomicronb11529sarscov2variantduringtheaplasticphaseofautologousstemcelltransplantation |