What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles?
The group model is a useful tool to understand broad-scale patterns of interaction in a network, but it has previously been limited in use to food webs, which contain only predator-prey interactions. Natural populations interact with each other in a variety of ways and, although most published ecolo...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-07-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4511233?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818201951861473280 |
|---|---|
| author | Elizabeth L Sander J Timothy Wootton Stefano Allesina |
| author_facet | Elizabeth L Sander J Timothy Wootton Stefano Allesina |
| author_sort | Elizabeth L Sander |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The group model is a useful tool to understand broad-scale patterns of interaction in a network, but it has previously been limited in use to food webs, which contain only predator-prey interactions. Natural populations interact with each other in a variety of ways and, although most published ecological networks only include information about a single interaction type (e.g., feeding, pollination), ecologists are beginning to consider networks which combine multiple interaction types. Here we extend the group model to signed directed networks such as ecological interaction webs. As a specific application of this method, we examine the effects of including or excluding specific interaction types on our understanding of species roles in ecological networks. We consider all three currently available interaction webs, two of which are extended plant-mutualist networks with herbivores and parasitoids added, and one of which is an extended intertidal food web with interactions of all possible sign structures (+/+, -/0, etc.). Species in the extended food web grouped similarly with all interactions, only trophic links, and only nontrophic links. However, removing mutualism or herbivory had a much larger effect in the extended plant-pollinator webs. Species removal even affected groups that were not directly connected to those that were removed, as we found by excluding a small number of parasitoids. These results suggest that including additional species in the network provides far more information than additional interactions for this aspect of network structure. Our methods provide a useful framework for simplifying networks to their essential structure, allowing us to identify generalities in network structure and better understand the roles species play in their communities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T03:01:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cd5f191ebd774185a8f63be16fbac215 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T03:01:43Z |
| publishDate | 2015-07-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Computational Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-cd5f191ebd774185a8f63be16fbac2152022-12-22T00:40:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582015-07-01117e100433010.1371/journal.pcbi.1004330What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles?Elizabeth L SanderJ Timothy WoottonStefano AllesinaThe group model is a useful tool to understand broad-scale patterns of interaction in a network, but it has previously been limited in use to food webs, which contain only predator-prey interactions. Natural populations interact with each other in a variety of ways and, although most published ecological networks only include information about a single interaction type (e.g., feeding, pollination), ecologists are beginning to consider networks which combine multiple interaction types. Here we extend the group model to signed directed networks such as ecological interaction webs. As a specific application of this method, we examine the effects of including or excluding specific interaction types on our understanding of species roles in ecological networks. We consider all three currently available interaction webs, two of which are extended plant-mutualist networks with herbivores and parasitoids added, and one of which is an extended intertidal food web with interactions of all possible sign structures (+/+, -/0, etc.). Species in the extended food web grouped similarly with all interactions, only trophic links, and only nontrophic links. However, removing mutualism or herbivory had a much larger effect in the extended plant-pollinator webs. Species removal even affected groups that were not directly connected to those that were removed, as we found by excluding a small number of parasitoids. These results suggest that including additional species in the network provides far more information than additional interactions for this aspect of network structure. Our methods provide a useful framework for simplifying networks to their essential structure, allowing us to identify generalities in network structure and better understand the roles species play in their communities.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4511233?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Elizabeth L Sander J Timothy Wootton Stefano Allesina What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? PLoS Computational Biology |
| title | What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? |
| title_full | What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? |
| title_fullStr | What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? |
| title_full_unstemmed | What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? |
| title_short | What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles? |
| title_sort | what can interaction webs tell us about species roles |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4511233?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elizabethlsander whatcaninteractionwebstellusaboutspeciesroles AT jtimothywootton whatcaninteractionwebstellusaboutspeciesroles AT stefanoallesina whatcaninteractionwebstellusaboutspeciesroles |