Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.

The genus Rattus is highly speciose, the taxonomy is complex, and individuals are often difficult to identify to the species level. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of phylogenetic approaches to identification in Rattus but some species, especially among the endemics of the New Guin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judith H Robins, Vernon Tintinger, Ken P Aplin, Melanie Hingston, Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith, David Penny, Shane D Lavery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4035291?pdf=render
_version_ 1811226917605474304
author Judith H Robins
Vernon Tintinger
Ken P Aplin
Melanie Hingston
Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith
David Penny
Shane D Lavery
author_facet Judith H Robins
Vernon Tintinger
Ken P Aplin
Melanie Hingston
Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith
David Penny
Shane D Lavery
author_sort Judith H Robins
collection DOAJ
description The genus Rattus is highly speciose, the taxonomy is complex, and individuals are often difficult to identify to the species level. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of phylogenetic approaches to identification in Rattus but some species, especially among the endemics of the New Guinean region, showed poor resolution. Possible reasons for this are simple misidentification, incomplete gene lineage sorting, hybridization, and phylogenetically distinct lineages that are unrecognised taxonomically. To assess these explanations we analysed 217 samples, representing nominally 25 Rattus species, collected in New Guinea, Asia, Australia and the Pacific. To reduce misidentification problems we sequenced museum specimens from earlier morphological studies and recently collected tissues from samples with associated voucher specimens. We also reassessed vouchers from previously sequenced specimens. We inferred combined and separate phylogenies from two mitochondrial DNA regions comprising 550 base pair D-loop sequences and both long (655 base pair) and short (150 base pair) cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Our phylogenetic species identification for 17 species was consistent with morphological designations and current taxonomy thus reinforcing the usefulness of this approach. We reduced misidentifications and consequently the number of polyphyletic species in our phylogenies but the New Guinean Rattus clades still exhibited considerable complexity. Only three of our eight New Guinean species were monophyletic. We found good evidence for either incomplete mitochondrial lineage sorting or hybridization between species within two pairs, R. leucopus/R. cf. verecundus and R. steini/R. praetor. Additionally, our results showed that R. praetor, R. niobe and R. verecundus each likely encompass more than one species. Our study clearly points to the need for a revised taxonomy of the rats of New Guinea, based on broader sampling and informed by both morphology and phylogenetics. The remaining taxonomic complexity highlights the recent and rapid radiation of Rattus in the Australo-Papuan region.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:32:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd77f9b4d5fe4acea8a425a312c78c05
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:32:53Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-cd77f9b4d5fe4acea8a425a312c78c052022-12-22T03:38:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9800210.1371/journal.pone.0098002Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.Judith H RobinsVernon TintingerKen P AplinMelanie HingstonElizabeth Matisoo-SmithDavid PennyShane D LaveryThe genus Rattus is highly speciose, the taxonomy is complex, and individuals are often difficult to identify to the species level. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of phylogenetic approaches to identification in Rattus but some species, especially among the endemics of the New Guinean region, showed poor resolution. Possible reasons for this are simple misidentification, incomplete gene lineage sorting, hybridization, and phylogenetically distinct lineages that are unrecognised taxonomically. To assess these explanations we analysed 217 samples, representing nominally 25 Rattus species, collected in New Guinea, Asia, Australia and the Pacific. To reduce misidentification problems we sequenced museum specimens from earlier morphological studies and recently collected tissues from samples with associated voucher specimens. We also reassessed vouchers from previously sequenced specimens. We inferred combined and separate phylogenies from two mitochondrial DNA regions comprising 550 base pair D-loop sequences and both long (655 base pair) and short (150 base pair) cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Our phylogenetic species identification for 17 species was consistent with morphological designations and current taxonomy thus reinforcing the usefulness of this approach. We reduced misidentifications and consequently the number of polyphyletic species in our phylogenies but the New Guinean Rattus clades still exhibited considerable complexity. Only three of our eight New Guinean species were monophyletic. We found good evidence for either incomplete mitochondrial lineage sorting or hybridization between species within two pairs, R. leucopus/R. cf. verecundus and R. steini/R. praetor. Additionally, our results showed that R. praetor, R. niobe and R. verecundus each likely encompass more than one species. Our study clearly points to the need for a revised taxonomy of the rats of New Guinea, based on broader sampling and informed by both morphology and phylogenetics. The remaining taxonomic complexity highlights the recent and rapid radiation of Rattus in the Australo-Papuan region.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4035291?pdf=render
spellingShingle Judith H Robins
Vernon Tintinger
Ken P Aplin
Melanie Hingston
Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith
David Penny
Shane D Lavery
Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
PLoS ONE
title Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
title_full Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
title_fullStr Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
title_short Phylogenetic species identification in Rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of New Guinean species.
title_sort phylogenetic species identification in rattus highlights rapid radiation and morphological similarity of new guinean species
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4035291?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT judithhrobins phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT vernontintinger phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT kenpaplin phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT melaniehingston phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT elizabethmatisoosmith phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT davidpenny phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies
AT shanedlavery phylogeneticspeciesidentificationinrattushighlightsrapidradiationandmorphologicalsimilarityofnewguineanspecies