Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench cv. Shinano No.1) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn. cv. Nepal) were grown in pots to examine their responses to soil flooding. Flooding treatment was carried out during the early growth stage by completely submerging the pots in a nutrient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroyuki Matsuura, Shinobu Inanaga, Takahisa Tetsuka, Kouhei Murata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2005-01-01
Series:Plant Production Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.525
_version_ 1817975793879351296
author Hiroyuki Matsuura
Shinobu Inanaga
Takahisa Tetsuka
Kouhei Murata
author_facet Hiroyuki Matsuura
Shinobu Inanaga
Takahisa Tetsuka
Kouhei Murata
author_sort Hiroyuki Matsuura
collection DOAJ
description Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench cv. Shinano No.1) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn. cv. Nepal) were grown in pots to examine their responses to soil flooding. Flooding treatment was carried out during the early growth stage by completely submerging the pots in a nutrient solution from 12 to 36 days after sowing. The plant growth rate, relative growth rate and mean leaf area under the flooding treatment were reduced to 72, 90 and 83% of the control, respectively, in Shinano No.1, and to 29, 71 and 45% of the control, respectively, in Nepal. The excess moisture stress had no effect on the net assimilation rate (NAR) in Shinano No.1, but lowered the NAR to 68% of that in the control in Nepal. Excess moisture stress decreased the total leaf area to 76 and 34% of the control in Shinano No.1 and Nepal, respectively. Leaf growth rate, number of leaves and leaf area per leaf, which influenced the total leaf area, were reduced by the excess soil moisture. The relative water content of leaves was unchanged in Shinano No.1, but was decreased in Nepal. Reduction in bleeding from the cut end of stem due to flooding was greater in Nepal than in Shinano No.1. Excess moisture stress reduced the K+ concentration of the stem and increased the Na+ concentration of leaves, stem and roots more strongly in Nepal than in Shinano No.1. Development of adventitious roots in the surface layer of the nutrient solution was better in Shinano No.1 than in Nepal. In conclusion, Shinano No.1 (common buckwheat) had a stronger tolerance to excess soil moisture than Nepal (Tartary buckwheat). In Shinano No. 1, leaf growth and photosynthetic rate were not markedly affected and the capacity of absorbing water and nutrients was retained by developing adventitious roots in the solution above the surface of the soil keeping proper physiological activity under excess moisture conditions.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:54:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd89f2f24ed84b49ab7cd9a2b69d0ed5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1343-943X
1349-1008
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:54:58Z
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Plant Production Science
spelling doaj.art-cd89f2f24ed84b49ab7cd9a2b69d0ed52022-12-22T02:28:18ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlant Production Science1343-943X1349-10082005-01-018552553210.1626/pps.8.52511644733Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary BuckwheatHiroyuki Matsuura0Shinobu Inanaga1Takahisa Tetsuka2Kouhei Murata3Department of Plant Science of Kyushu Tokai UniversityJapan International Research Center for Agricultural SciencesNational Agricultural Research Center for Kyushu Okinawa RegionDepartment of Plant Science of Kyushu Tokai UniversityCommon buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench cv. Shinano No.1) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn. cv. Nepal) were grown in pots to examine their responses to soil flooding. Flooding treatment was carried out during the early growth stage by completely submerging the pots in a nutrient solution from 12 to 36 days after sowing. The plant growth rate, relative growth rate and mean leaf area under the flooding treatment were reduced to 72, 90 and 83% of the control, respectively, in Shinano No.1, and to 29, 71 and 45% of the control, respectively, in Nepal. The excess moisture stress had no effect on the net assimilation rate (NAR) in Shinano No.1, but lowered the NAR to 68% of that in the control in Nepal. Excess moisture stress decreased the total leaf area to 76 and 34% of the control in Shinano No.1 and Nepal, respectively. Leaf growth rate, number of leaves and leaf area per leaf, which influenced the total leaf area, were reduced by the excess soil moisture. The relative water content of leaves was unchanged in Shinano No.1, but was decreased in Nepal. Reduction in bleeding from the cut end of stem due to flooding was greater in Nepal than in Shinano No.1. Excess moisture stress reduced the K+ concentration of the stem and increased the Na+ concentration of leaves, stem and roots more strongly in Nepal than in Shinano No.1. Development of adventitious roots in the surface layer of the nutrient solution was better in Shinano No.1 than in Nepal. In conclusion, Shinano No.1 (common buckwheat) had a stronger tolerance to excess soil moisture than Nepal (Tartary buckwheat). In Shinano No. 1, leaf growth and photosynthetic rate were not markedly affected and the capacity of absorbing water and nutrients was retained by developing adventitious roots in the solution above the surface of the soil keeping proper physiological activity under excess moisture conditions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.525Adventitious rootCommon buckwheatFloodingInterspecific differenceTartary buckwheatVegetative growth
spellingShingle Hiroyuki Matsuura
Shinobu Inanaga
Takahisa Tetsuka
Kouhei Murata
Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
Plant Production Science
Adventitious root
Common buckwheat
Flooding
Interspecific difference
Tartary buckwheat
Vegetative growth
title Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
title_full Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
title_fullStr Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
title_short Differences in Vegetative Growth Response to Soil Flooding between Common and Tartary Buckwheat
title_sort differences in vegetative growth response to soil flooding between common and tartary buckwheat
topic Adventitious root
Common buckwheat
Flooding
Interspecific difference
Tartary buckwheat
Vegetative growth
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.525
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroyukimatsuura differencesinvegetativegrowthresponsetosoilfloodingbetweencommonandtartarybuckwheat
AT shinobuinanaga differencesinvegetativegrowthresponsetosoilfloodingbetweencommonandtartarybuckwheat
AT takahisatetsuka differencesinvegetativegrowthresponsetosoilfloodingbetweencommonandtartarybuckwheat
AT kouheimurata differencesinvegetativegrowthresponsetosoilfloodingbetweencommonandtartarybuckwheat