Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb.
We investigated mediolateral dynamic stability at first foot off and first initial contact during gait initiation according to whether the paretic or non-paretic leg was used as the leading limb. Thirty-eight individuals with stroke initiated gait with the paretic and non-paretic legs as the leading...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267577 |
| _version_ | 1811292629152825344 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuji Osada Naoyuki Motojima Yousuke Kobayashi Sumiko Yamamoto |
| author_facet | Yuji Osada Naoyuki Motojima Yousuke Kobayashi Sumiko Yamamoto |
| author_sort | Yuji Osada |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We investigated mediolateral dynamic stability at first foot off and first initial contact during gait initiation according to whether the paretic or non-paretic leg was used as the leading limb. Thirty-eight individuals with stroke initiated gait with the paretic and non-paretic legs as the leading limb, and their movements were measured using a 3D motion analysis system. Margin of stability (i.e., the length between the extrapolated center of mass and lateral border of the stance foot) was used as an index of dynamic stability, with a large value indicating dynamic stability in the lateral direction. However, an excessively large margin of stability value (i.e., when the extrapolated center of mass is outside the medial border of the stance foot) indicates dynamic instability in the medial direction. Differences in the margin of stability between tasks were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The minimum margin of stability was observed just before first foot off. When the non-paretic leg was used as the leading limb, the margin of stability tended to be excessively large at first foot off compared with when the paretic leg was used (p < 0.001). In other words, the extrapolated center of mass was outside the medial border of the paretic stance foot. In conclusion, lateral stability was achieved when using the non-paretic leading limb because the extrapolated center of mass was located outside the medial border of the stance foot. However, medial dynamic stability was lower for the non-paretic leading limb compared with the paretic leading limb. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T04:49:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cdb5d19072064f04bee4f2f99d6d4231 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T04:49:10Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-cdb5d19072064f04bee4f2f99d6d42312022-12-22T03:01:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01174e026757710.1371/journal.pone.0267577Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb.Yuji OsadaNaoyuki MotojimaYousuke KobayashiSumiko YamamotoWe investigated mediolateral dynamic stability at first foot off and first initial contact during gait initiation according to whether the paretic or non-paretic leg was used as the leading limb. Thirty-eight individuals with stroke initiated gait with the paretic and non-paretic legs as the leading limb, and their movements were measured using a 3D motion analysis system. Margin of stability (i.e., the length between the extrapolated center of mass and lateral border of the stance foot) was used as an index of dynamic stability, with a large value indicating dynamic stability in the lateral direction. However, an excessively large margin of stability value (i.e., when the extrapolated center of mass is outside the medial border of the stance foot) indicates dynamic instability in the medial direction. Differences in the margin of stability between tasks were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The minimum margin of stability was observed just before first foot off. When the non-paretic leg was used as the leading limb, the margin of stability tended to be excessively large at first foot off compared with when the paretic leg was used (p < 0.001). In other words, the extrapolated center of mass was outside the medial border of the paretic stance foot. In conclusion, lateral stability was achieved when using the non-paretic leading limb because the extrapolated center of mass was located outside the medial border of the stance foot. However, medial dynamic stability was lower for the non-paretic leading limb compared with the paretic leading limb.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267577 |
| spellingShingle | Yuji Osada Naoyuki Motojima Yousuke Kobayashi Sumiko Yamamoto Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. PLoS ONE |
| title | Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. |
| title_full | Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. |
| title_fullStr | Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. |
| title_short | Differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non-paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb. |
| title_sort | differences in mediolateral dynamic stability during gait initiation according to whether the non paretic or paretic leg is used as the leading limb |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267577 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yujiosada differencesinmediolateraldynamicstabilityduringgaitinitiationaccordingtowhetherthenonpareticorpareticlegisusedastheleadinglimb AT naoyukimotojima differencesinmediolateraldynamicstabilityduringgaitinitiationaccordingtowhetherthenonpareticorpareticlegisusedastheleadinglimb AT yousukekobayashi differencesinmediolateraldynamicstabilityduringgaitinitiationaccordingtowhetherthenonpareticorpareticlegisusedastheleadinglimb AT sumikoyamamoto differencesinmediolateraldynamicstabilityduringgaitinitiationaccordingtowhetherthenonpareticorpareticlegisusedastheleadinglimb |