A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia

Abstract Background Gynecomastia is a common condition in clinical practice. The present study aimed to review the clinical data of ER-positive gynecomastia patients treated by tamoxifen (TAM) versus surgery and discussed the clinical effects of the two treatment strategies. Method We retrospectivel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weili He, Weidong Wei, Qing Zhang, Rongzhao Lv, Shaohua Qu, Xin Huang, Juan Ma, Ping Zhang, Hening Zhai, Ningxia Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Endocrine Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01310-9
_version_ 1797864450977431552
author Weili He
Weidong Wei
Qing Zhang
Rongzhao Lv
Shaohua Qu
Xin Huang
Juan Ma
Ping Zhang
Hening Zhai
Ningxia Wang
author_facet Weili He
Weidong Wei
Qing Zhang
Rongzhao Lv
Shaohua Qu
Xin Huang
Juan Ma
Ping Zhang
Hening Zhai
Ningxia Wang
author_sort Weili He
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Gynecomastia is a common condition in clinical practice. The present study aimed to review the clinical data of ER-positive gynecomastia patients treated by tamoxifen (TAM) versus surgery and discussed the clinical effects of the two treatment strategies. Method We retrospectively collected the clinical indicators of patients with unilateral or bilateral gynecomastia who received treatment at our hospital between April 2018 and December 2021. Depending on the treatment received, the patients were divided into TAM and surgery groups. Result A total of 170 patients were recruited, including 91 patients in TAM group and 79 patients in surgery group. The age of the patients differed significantly between the TAM and surgery groups (P < 0.01). The estrogen level was closer in patients with stable and progressive disease, but significantly different in patients of glandular shrinkage in TAM group (P < 0.01). The proportion of patients achieving stable disease was higher among those with clinical grade 1–2. Among patients classified as clinical grade 3, the proportion of patients achieving glandular shrinkage of the breast was higher after TAM treatment (P < 0.05). The age and length of hospital stay were significantly different in patients undergoing open surgery than minimally invasive rotary cutting surgery and mammoscopic-assisted glandular resection (P < 0.01). Patients had significantly different complications including mild postoperative pain, hematoma, nipple necrosis, nipple paresthesias and effusions among the surgery subgroups (all P < 0.05). The estrogen level and the type of surgery were significantly different between the surgical recurrence and non-recurrence subgroups (P < 0.05). The difference in the thickness of glandular tissues upon the color Doppler ultrasound also reached a statistical significance between the two groups (P = 0.050). An elevated estrogen level was a factor leading to TAM failure. Among surgical patients, the thickness of glandular tissues, estrogen level, and type of surgery performed were risk factors for postoperative recurrence (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Both treatment strategies can effectively treat gynecomastia, but different treatment methods can benefit different patients. TAM treatment is more beneficial than surgery for patients who cannot tolerate surgery, have a low estrogen level, and are clinical grade 1–2. Surgery treatment is better than TAM for patients of clinical grade 3. Different surgery options may lead to different complications. Patients with a greater glandular tissue thickness and a higher estrogen level were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cdbec30a9c7a4a769aad0f93c56e4300
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6823
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:17Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Endocrine Disorders
spelling doaj.art-cdbec30a9c7a4a769aad0f93c56e43002023-03-22T11:33:51ZengBMCBMC Endocrine Disorders1472-68232023-03-012311910.1186/s12902-023-01310-9A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastiaWeili He0Weidong Wei1Qing Zhang2Rongzhao Lv3Shaohua Qu4Xin Huang5Juan Ma6Ping Zhang7Hening Zhai8Ningxia Wang9Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer CenterDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy c Center, the First/Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityAbstract Background Gynecomastia is a common condition in clinical practice. The present study aimed to review the clinical data of ER-positive gynecomastia patients treated by tamoxifen (TAM) versus surgery and discussed the clinical effects of the two treatment strategies. Method We retrospectively collected the clinical indicators of patients with unilateral or bilateral gynecomastia who received treatment at our hospital between April 2018 and December 2021. Depending on the treatment received, the patients were divided into TAM and surgery groups. Result A total of 170 patients were recruited, including 91 patients in TAM group and 79 patients in surgery group. The age of the patients differed significantly between the TAM and surgery groups (P < 0.01). The estrogen level was closer in patients with stable and progressive disease, but significantly different in patients of glandular shrinkage in TAM group (P < 0.01). The proportion of patients achieving stable disease was higher among those with clinical grade 1–2. Among patients classified as clinical grade 3, the proportion of patients achieving glandular shrinkage of the breast was higher after TAM treatment (P < 0.05). The age and length of hospital stay were significantly different in patients undergoing open surgery than minimally invasive rotary cutting surgery and mammoscopic-assisted glandular resection (P < 0.01). Patients had significantly different complications including mild postoperative pain, hematoma, nipple necrosis, nipple paresthesias and effusions among the surgery subgroups (all P < 0.05). The estrogen level and the type of surgery were significantly different between the surgical recurrence and non-recurrence subgroups (P < 0.05). The difference in the thickness of glandular tissues upon the color Doppler ultrasound also reached a statistical significance between the two groups (P = 0.050). An elevated estrogen level was a factor leading to TAM failure. Among surgical patients, the thickness of glandular tissues, estrogen level, and type of surgery performed were risk factors for postoperative recurrence (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Both treatment strategies can effectively treat gynecomastia, but different treatment methods can benefit different patients. TAM treatment is more beneficial than surgery for patients who cannot tolerate surgery, have a low estrogen level, and are clinical grade 1–2. Surgery treatment is better than TAM for patients of clinical grade 3. Different surgery options may lead to different complications. Patients with a greater glandular tissue thickness and a higher estrogen level were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01310-9GynecomastiaTamoxifenSurgeryRecurrenceComplications
spellingShingle Weili He
Weidong Wei
Qing Zhang
Rongzhao Lv
Shaohua Qu
Xin Huang
Juan Ma
Ping Zhang
Hening Zhai
Ningxia Wang
A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Gynecomastia
Tamoxifen
Surgery
Recurrence
Complications
title A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
title_full A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
title_fullStr A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
title_short A retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for ER-positive gynecomastia
title_sort retrospective cohort study of tamoxifen versus surgical treatment for er positive gynecomastia
topic Gynecomastia
Tamoxifen
Surgery
Recurrence
Complications
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01310-9
work_keys_str_mv AT weilihe aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT weidongwei aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT qingzhang aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT rongzhaolv aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT shaohuaqu aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT xinhuang aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT juanma aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT pingzhang aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT heningzhai aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT ningxiawang aretrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT weilihe retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT weidongwei retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT qingzhang retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT rongzhaolv retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT shaohuaqu retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT xinhuang retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT juanma retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT pingzhang retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT heningzhai retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia
AT ningxiawang retrospectivecohortstudyoftamoxifenversussurgicaltreatmentforerpositivegynecomastia