Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators

The never-ending quest to improve the security of digital information combined with recent improvements in hardware technology has caused the field of random number generation to undergo a fundamental shift from relying solely on pseudo-random algorithms to employing optical entropy sources. Despite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph D. Hart, Yuta Terashima, Atsushi Uchida, Gerald B. Baumgartner, Thomas E. Murphy, Rajarshi Roy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2017-09-01
Series:APL Photonics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5000056
_version_ 1818066181110628352
author Joseph D. Hart
Yuta Terashima
Atsushi Uchida
Gerald B. Baumgartner
Thomas E. Murphy
Rajarshi Roy
author_facet Joseph D. Hart
Yuta Terashima
Atsushi Uchida
Gerald B. Baumgartner
Thomas E. Murphy
Rajarshi Roy
author_sort Joseph D. Hart
collection DOAJ
description The never-ending quest to improve the security of digital information combined with recent improvements in hardware technology has caused the field of random number generation to undergo a fundamental shift from relying solely on pseudo-random algorithms to employing optical entropy sources. Despite these significant advances on the hardware side, commonly used statistical measures and evaluation practices remain ill-suited to understand or quantify the optical entropy that underlies physical random number generation. We review the state of the art in the evaluation of optical random number generation and recommend a new paradigm: quantifying entropy generation and understanding the physical limits of the optical sources of randomness. In order to do this, we advocate for the separation of the physical entropy source from deterministic post-processing in the evaluation of random number generators and for the explicit consideration of the impact of the measurement and digitization process on the rate of entropy production. We present the Cohen-Procaccia estimate of the entropy rate h(𝜖,τ) as one way to do this. In order to provide an illustration of our recommendations, we apply the Cohen-Procaccia estimate as well as the entropy estimates from the new NIST draft standards for physical random number generators to evaluate and compare three common optical entropy sources: single photon time-of-arrival detection, chaotic lasers, and amplified spontaneous emission.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:03:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cdc2adfee70b4c82b89f28b99776df3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2378-0967
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:03:42Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format Article
series APL Photonics
spelling doaj.art-cdc2adfee70b4c82b89f28b99776df3c2022-12-22T01:44:06ZengAIP Publishing LLCAPL Photonics2378-09672017-09-0129090901090901-2210.1063/1.5000056001709APPRecommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generatorsJoseph D. Hart0Yuta Terashima1Atsushi Uchida2Gerald B. Baumgartner3Thomas E. Murphy4Rajarshi Roy5Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USADepartment of Information and Computer Sciences, Saitama University, Saitama, JapanDepartment of Information and Computer Sciences, Saitama University, Saitama, JapanLaboratory for Telecommunication Sciences, College Park, Maryland 20740, USAInstitute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USAInstitute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USAThe never-ending quest to improve the security of digital information combined with recent improvements in hardware technology has caused the field of random number generation to undergo a fundamental shift from relying solely on pseudo-random algorithms to employing optical entropy sources. Despite these significant advances on the hardware side, commonly used statistical measures and evaluation practices remain ill-suited to understand or quantify the optical entropy that underlies physical random number generation. We review the state of the art in the evaluation of optical random number generation and recommend a new paradigm: quantifying entropy generation and understanding the physical limits of the optical sources of randomness. In order to do this, we advocate for the separation of the physical entropy source from deterministic post-processing in the evaluation of random number generators and for the explicit consideration of the impact of the measurement and digitization process on the rate of entropy production. We present the Cohen-Procaccia estimate of the entropy rate h(𝜖,τ) as one way to do this. In order to provide an illustration of our recommendations, we apply the Cohen-Procaccia estimate as well as the entropy estimates from the new NIST draft standards for physical random number generators to evaluate and compare three common optical entropy sources: single photon time-of-arrival detection, chaotic lasers, and amplified spontaneous emission.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5000056
spellingShingle Joseph D. Hart
Yuta Terashima
Atsushi Uchida
Gerald B. Baumgartner
Thomas E. Murphy
Rajarshi Roy
Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
APL Photonics
title Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
title_full Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
title_fullStr Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
title_short Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
title_sort recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5000056
work_keys_str_mv AT josephdhart recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators
AT yutaterashima recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators
AT atsushiuchida recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators
AT geraldbbaumgartner recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators
AT thomasemurphy recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators
AT rajarshiroy recommendationsandillustrationsfortheevaluationofphotonicrandomnumbergenerators