Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect

There is graving concern over the intrusion of managerialism into academe. The debate often centres on the concept of quality management and involves problematic assumptions about the notions of workload,  performance and development. This article problematises these assumptions, with reference to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Damian Ruth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2001-02-01
Series:Acta Academica
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/637
_version_ 1797270936286658560
author Damian Ruth
author_facet Damian Ruth
author_sort Damian Ruth
collection DOAJ
description There is graving concern over the intrusion of managerialism into academe. The debate often centres on the concept of quality management and involves problematic assumptions about the notions of workload,  performance and development. This article problematises these assumptions, with reference to the role of perception and affect in the quantification of workload, the production of performance criteria, and the construction of development programmes. It argues that these activities need to be part of an organic process arising out of specific circumstances. There are real conceptual difficulties involved and any failure to attend to the role of perception and affect will seriously undermine education.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:43:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cdc9bad390834539bd1f456e29a930fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0587-2405
2415-0479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T02:12:11Z
publishDate 2001-02-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Academica
spelling doaj.art-cdc9bad390834539bd1f456e29a930fa2024-03-07T11:14:28ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Academica0587-24052415-04792001-02-01331Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affectDamian Ruth0University of the North There is graving concern over the intrusion of managerialism into academe. The debate often centres on the concept of quality management and involves problematic assumptions about the notions of workload,  performance and development. This article problematises these assumptions, with reference to the role of perception and affect in the quantification of workload, the production of performance criteria, and the construction of development programmes. It argues that these activities need to be part of an organic process arising out of specific circumstances. There are real conceptual difficulties involved and any failure to attend to the role of perception and affect will seriously undermine education. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/637
spellingShingle Damian Ruth
Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
Acta Academica
title Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
title_full Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
title_fullStr Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
title_full_unstemmed Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
title_short Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect
title_sort academic workload performance appraisal and staff development issues of quantification criteria perception and affect
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/637
work_keys_str_mv AT damianruth academicworkloadperformanceappraisalandstaffdevelopmentissuesofquantificationcriteriaperceptionandaffect